1/47
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
tu quoque
You avoided having to engage with criticism by turning it back on the accuser - you answered criticism with criticism .
the texas sharpshooter
You cherry - picked a data cluster to suit your argument , or found a pattern to fit a presumption .
strawman
You misrepresented someone's argument to make it easier to attack
loaded question
You asked a question that had a presumption built into it so that it couldn't be answered without appearing guilty .
no true scotsman
You made what could be called an appeal to purity as a way to dismiss relevant criticisms or flaws of your argument .
personal incredulity
Because you found something difficult to understand , or are unaware of how it works , you made out like it's probably not true .
slippery slope
You said that if we allow A to happen , then Z will eventually happen too , therefore A should not happen .
middle ground
You claimed that a compromise , or middle point , between two extremes must be the truth
the gambler's fallacy
You said that ' runs ' occur to statistically independent phenomena such as roulette wheel spins .
genetic
You judged something as either good or bad on the basis of where it comes from , or from whom it came
false cause
You presumed that a real or perceived relationship between things means that one is the cause of the other .
special pleading
You moved the goalposts or made up an exception when your was shown to be false .
the fallacy fallacy
You presumed that because a claim has been poorly argued , or a fallacy has been made , that the claim itself must be wrong .
composition/division
You assumed that one part of something has to be applied to all or other , parts of it ; or that the whole must apply to its parts .
begging the question
You presented a circular argument in which the conclusion was included in the premise .
burden of proof
You said that the burden of proof lies not with the person making the claim , but with someone else to disprove
bandwagon
You appealed to popularity or the fact that many people do something as an attempted form of validation .
black - or - white
You presented two alternative states as the only possibilities , when in fact more possibilities exist
appeal to nature
You argued that because something is ' natural ' it is therefore valid , justified , inevitable good or ideal .
appeal to authority
You said that because an authority thinks something , it must therefore be true .
ad hominem
You attacked your opponent's character or personal traits in an attempt to undermine their argument
appeal to emotion
You attempted to manipulate an emotional response in place of a valid or compelling argument
ambiguity
You used a double meaning or ambiguity of language to mislead or misrepresent the truth .
anecdotal
You used a personal experience or an isolated example instead of a sound argument or compelling evidence .
Appeal to Ignorance
Claiming that a statement must be true because there's no evidence against it .
Red Herring
A misleading argument or question is presented to distract from the main issue or argument at hand
Hasty Generalization
Drawing expansive conclusions based on inadequate or insufficient evidence .
Non sequitur
A statement or conclusion that does not follow logically from what preceded it .
Gish Gallop
Overwhelming an interlocutor with as many arguments as possible , without regard for accuracy or Strength of the arguments
Appeal to Intuition
Evaluating an argument based on "intuition" or "gut feeling" that is unable to be articulated , rather than evaluating the argument using reason
Hypnotic Bait and Switch
Stating several uncontroversially true statements in succession , followed by a claim that the arguer wants the audience to accept true .
Magical Thinking
Making causal connections or correlations between two events not based on logic or evidence , but primarily based on superstition
Deceptive Sharing
Sharing an article post , or meme on social media with the intent to influence public perception to perceive a statistically rare event as a common event .
Argument from Silence
Drawing a conclusion based on the silence of the opponent , when the opponent is refusing to give evidence for any reason .
Appeal to Coincidence
Concluding that a result is due to chance when the evidence strongly suggests otherwise
Fantasy Projection
Confusing subjective experiences , usually very emotionally charged , with objective reality , then suggesting or demanding that others accept the subjective experience as objective reality
Retrospective Determinism
Arguing that because something happened , it was inevitable .
Inflation of Conflict
Assumes that the instances wher scholars and scientists have differing opinions on something calls the credibility of the antire field into question
Appeal to Tradition
Arguing that a thesis must be correct because it has traditionally been so .
Argument from Repetition
Repeating a statement often in the hopes that the listener will begin to accept it as truth instead of providing evidence
Argument from Age
The misconception that previous generations had superior wisdom to modern people - so conclusions that rely on this wisdom are more true than they actually are .
Appeal to Closure
Accepting evidence on the basis of wanting closure or to be done with the issue .
Appeal to Desperation
Arguing that your conclusion solution ar proposition is right based on the fact that something must be done , and your solution is " something "
Appeal to Faith
An abandonment of reason in an argument and a call to faith , usually when reason clearly leads to disproving the conclusion of an argument .
Self - Righteousness Fallacy
Assuming that just because your intentions are good you have the truth or facts on your side
Wishful Thinking
When the desire for something to be true is used in place offer as evidence for the truthfulness of the claim
False Equivalence
Claiming two completely opposing arguments appear to be logically equivalent when in fact they are not
Psychogenetic Fallacy
Inferring some psychological reason why an argument is made then assuming it is invalid . as a result .