topic 5 - VSEPR theory

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/18

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

19 Terms

1
New cards

lewis theory

  • a cov bond is formed when two neighbouring atoms share an electron pair

  • octet rule : atoms share electron pairs until they have acquired an octet of valence electrons - except doublet in H

  • only valence electrons are important in making cov bonds

  • assumes localised bonding electrons - electrons stay assigned to a given atom in a cov bond

2
New cards

limitations of Lewis theory

  • lewis diagrams don’t directly allow the prediction of molecular geometry

  • exceptions to octet rule: electron difficient molecules eg. BeH2, BF3 ad hypervalent molecules w expanded octet eg. SF6 and PCl5

3
New cards

What is VSEPR theory?

  • valence shell electron pair repulsion theory

  • used to predict molecular geometry and deviations from ideal geometry eg. in bond lengths and angles

  • works with both electron deficient and hypervalent molecules

primary assumption:

  • regions of enhanced electron density stay as far away from each other as possible

  • regions= bonding pairs, lone pairs, single unpaired electrons (radicals)

4
New cards

what are the 5 rules of VSEPR theory?

  1. stereochemsitry is determined by valence shell electron pairs arranging themselves to minimise repulsions

  2. relative strength of main interactions- lp-lp > lp-bp > bp-bp

  3. geometry in determined only from the number of sigma pairs and lone pairs (pi bonds are not counted)

  4. bonding pair sizes: A(triple)B > A=B > A-B

  5. the size of a bonding pair decreases with increasing electronegativity of the ligand

5
New cards

simplified steps to using VSEPR (1-6)

  1. central- least electroneg where possible

  2. no. of electrons- all in outer s+p orbitals

  3. add donated- e- donated to bonding by ligands

  4. charge- add for negative, subtract for positive

  5. pairs- divide total e- by two

  6. distribute ligands- consider pair repulsions + minimise

6
New cards

predicted geometry of electron pair distribution based on 7 valence electron pairs

  • pentagonal bipypamidal

  • sp3d3 hybridisation of central atom

7
New cards

predicting distortions from ideal geometry- PCl5 - not all the P-Cl bonds are the same length, why?

  • shape - trigonal bipyramidal

  • P-Clax > P-Cleq

  • extra repulsion from having 3 atoms at 90 degrees rather than 2 from the equatorial chlorines therefore equatorial bond length is slightly shorter

8
New cards

what are the relative sizes of bonding and lone pairs?

  • a bonding pair is attracted to two nuclei

  • a lone pair is attracted to only one

  • hence the lone pair is effectively more repulsive as it has a greater density closer to the nucleus

  • more effective at pushing other atoms away

9
New cards

implications of rule 2: example of SF4

  • electron pair distribution shape - trigonal bi pyramidal - has one lone pair so actually sawhorse

  • most repulsive interactions occur between pairs at 90 degrees

  • so having the lone pair equatorial is more favourable than axial

  • all bonds are pushed away from long pair and closer to each other

  • by default lone pairs should be placed on the equatorial sites to reduce repulsion

10
New cards

sawhorse shape

  • 5 total electron pairs

  • 1 lone pair in an equatorial site

11
New cards

T-shaped molecular shape

  • 5 total electron pairs

  • 2 lone pairs in equatorial sites

12
New cards

linear? (5 pairs)

  • 5 total electron pairs

  • 3 lone pairs in equatorial sites

13
New cards

square planar (6 pairs)

  • 6 total electron pairs

  • 2 lone pairs (in axial positions)

14
New cards

how to determine how many electrons ligands donate

  • consider how many ligand electrons are involved in bonding to central atom

  • lone pairs in single atoms are not counted eg. N and P are 3 e- donors and O, S and Se are 2 electron donors

  • do not break bond on multiple atoms ligands eg. CH2 donates 2 electrons form the Cp orbitals

15
New cards

implications of rule three: example NOCl

  • 1st bond = sigma

  • 2nd bond = pi

  • 4 electron pairs : 2 sigma, 1 pi and one lone pair

  • electron pair distribution shape = trigonal planar

  • molecular shape = bent/non-linear

  • distortions likely due to presence of lone pair

  • pi bonds are slightly more repulsive than sigma bonds but not more than lone pairs bc electron density isn’t as close as in lone pairs - above + below internuclear axis

  • O-N-Cl = <120 degrees

16
New cards

implications of rule 4 : example POCl3

  • electron density increases with increasingly multiple bonds

  • 4 sigma bonds, 1 pi bond, no lps

  • shape of electron pair distribution + molecular shape = tetrahedral

  • deviations from ideal geometry likely due to presence of pi bond

  • Cl-P-Cl <109.5 degrees

  • O-P-Cl > 109.5 degrees

  • (not relevant here but lp have less effect on pi bonds than sigma bonds)

17
New cards

do long pairs have a greater effect on sigma or pi bonds?

  • sigma

18
New cards

implications of rule 5

  • the greater the electronegativity the lower the repulsive nature

  • electron density in O-F is closer to F due to high electroneg so F are more able to be pushed together - bonds are less repulsive

  • result H-O-H (H2O)= 104.5 vs F-O-F (F2O) = 103.2

  • also NH3 vs NFs

  • F-N-F bond angle is smaller as N-F bonds can be pushed closer together as there is weak electron density in the bond the closer to N you get

19
New cards

effect of radical species

  • a radical species are those w a single unpaired valence electron - very reactive

  • in VSEPR a radical e- is treated as a small lone pair - a very weak species

  • lp > A(triple)B > A=B > A-B > e-

  • larger angle in NO2 compared NO2 - shows weak repulsive nature of radical - pi bonds are pushing back against it increasing the angle past 120 degrees

  • radicals still contribute to shape so NO2 has a trigonal planar shape