1/18
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
lewis theory
a cov bond is formed when two neighbouring atoms share an electron pair
octet rule : atoms share electron pairs until they have acquired an octet of valence electrons - except doublet in H
only valence electrons are important in making cov bonds
assumes localised bonding electrons - electrons stay assigned to a given atom in a cov bond
limitations of Lewis theory
lewis diagrams don’t directly allow the prediction of molecular geometry
exceptions to octet rule: electron difficient molecules eg. BeH2, BF3 ad hypervalent molecules w expanded octet eg. SF6 and PCl5
What is VSEPR theory?
valence shell electron pair repulsion theory
used to predict molecular geometry and deviations from ideal geometry eg. in bond lengths and angles
works with both electron deficient and hypervalent molecules
primary assumption:
regions of enhanced electron density stay as far away from each other as possible
regions= bonding pairs, lone pairs, single unpaired electrons (radicals)
what are the 5 rules of VSEPR theory?
stereochemsitry is determined by valence shell electron pairs arranging themselves to minimise repulsions
relative strength of main interactions- lp-lp > lp-bp > bp-bp
geometry in determined only from the number of sigma pairs and lone pairs (pi bonds are not counted)
bonding pair sizes: A(triple)B > A=B > A-B
the size of a bonding pair decreases with increasing electronegativity of the ligand
simplified steps to using VSEPR (1-6)
central- least electroneg where possible
no. of electrons- all in outer s+p orbitals
add donated- e- donated to bonding by ligands
charge- add for negative, subtract for positive
pairs- divide total e- by two
distribute ligands- consider pair repulsions + minimise
predicted geometry of electron pair distribution based on 7 valence electron pairs
pentagonal bipypamidal
sp3d3 hybridisation of central atom
predicting distortions from ideal geometry- PCl5 - not all the P-Cl bonds are the same length, why?
shape - trigonal bipyramidal
P-Clax > P-Cleq
extra repulsion from having 3 atoms at 90 degrees rather than 2 from the equatorial chlorines therefore equatorial bond length is slightly shorter
what are the relative sizes of bonding and lone pairs?
a bonding pair is attracted to two nuclei
a lone pair is attracted to only one
hence the lone pair is effectively more repulsive as it has a greater density closer to the nucleus
more effective at pushing other atoms away
implications of rule 2: example of SF4
electron pair distribution shape - trigonal bi pyramidal - has one lone pair so actually sawhorse
most repulsive interactions occur between pairs at 90 degrees
so having the lone pair equatorial is more favourable than axial
all bonds are pushed away from long pair and closer to each other
by default lone pairs should be placed on the equatorial sites to reduce repulsion
sawhorse shape
5 total electron pairs
1 lone pair in an equatorial site
T-shaped molecular shape
5 total electron pairs
2 lone pairs in equatorial sites
linear? (5 pairs)
5 total electron pairs
3 lone pairs in equatorial sites
square planar (6 pairs)
6 total electron pairs
2 lone pairs (in axial positions)
how to determine how many electrons ligands donate
consider how many ligand electrons are involved in bonding to central atom
lone pairs in single atoms are not counted eg. N and P are 3 e- donors and O, S and Se are 2 electron donors
do not break bond on multiple atoms ligands eg. CH2 donates 2 electrons form the Cp orbitals
implications of rule three: example NOCl
1st bond = sigma
2nd bond = pi
4 electron pairs : 2 sigma, 1 pi and one lone pair
electron pair distribution shape = trigonal planar
molecular shape = bent/non-linear
distortions likely due to presence of lone pair
pi bonds are slightly more repulsive than sigma bonds but not more than lone pairs bc electron density isn’t as close as in lone pairs - above + below internuclear axis
O-N-Cl = <120 degrees
implications of rule 4 : example POCl3
electron density increases with increasingly multiple bonds
4 sigma bonds, 1 pi bond, no lps
shape of electron pair distribution + molecular shape = tetrahedral
deviations from ideal geometry likely due to presence of pi bond
Cl-P-Cl <109.5 degrees
O-P-Cl > 109.5 degrees
(not relevant here but lp have less effect on pi bonds than sigma bonds)
do long pairs have a greater effect on sigma or pi bonds?
sigma
implications of rule 5
the greater the electronegativity the lower the repulsive nature
electron density in O-F is closer to F due to high electroneg so F are more able to be pushed together - bonds are less repulsive
result H-O-H (H2O)= 104.5 vs F-O-F (F2O) = 103.2
also NH3 vs NFs
F-N-F bond angle is smaller as N-F bonds can be pushed closer together as there is weak electron density in the bond the closer to N you get
effect of radical species
a radical species are those w a single unpaired valence electron - very reactive
in VSEPR a radical e- is treated as a small lone pair - a very weak species
lp > A(triple)B > A=B > A-B > e-
larger angle in NO2 compared NO2 - shows weak repulsive nature of radical - pi bonds are pushing back against it increasing the angle past 120 degrees
radicals still contribute to shape so NO2 has a trigonal planar shape