1/92
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
berger defining religion
acts as a ‘sacred canopy’ giving meaning and prevents anxiety
three types of sociological definitions for religion
substantive, functional, polytheistic
substantive definition of religion
focuses on substance of religious beliefs, belief in a supernatural power or God, exclusive (clear line between religious and non religious belief). accused of western bias
tylor- ‘belief in spiritual beings’
bruce- ‘beliefs action and institutions which assume existence of supernatural entities and powers of action’
berger- ‘scared canopy’ - supernatural protection
criticisms of substantive definitions
ignored religious practices and non beliefs in god
provides a very broad understanding- western bias
but it widely accepted
functional definitions of religion
focuses on social or psychological functions for an individual or society, inclusive, benefits society, assumes religion is a product of society, it contributed to society through binding though shared values, inclusive
could suggest that a football chant is religious
yinger- ‘a system of beliefs and practices by mean of which a group of people snuggle with the ultimate problems of human life’, such as answering about the meanings of life
durkheim- defines religion in terms of contribution it makes to social integration rather than any specific belief in god or supernatural
criticisms of functional definitions
broad and doesn’t involve anti-religious systems that contribute to society
assumes religion is useful and functional
however no bias to western traditions
polythetic definitions of religion
how members of society define religion, cannot produce a universal definiton, it has a deeper meaning
overlapping factors that most religions share: salvation, ethical code, sacred texts, moral community, participation
Southwold- 10 factors: concern with godlike beings, concern with the sacred, salvation, rituals and practices, faith, ethics, supernatural, mythology, sacred texts/ oral tradition, moral community
critcisms of polytheistic definition
not clear how many factors need to be shared
what to include in the list itself
constructionist definitions
take an interpretivist approach that focuses on how members of society themselves define religion, argue its not possible to produce a single universal definition
aldridge- interested in how defintion of religion are constructed, challenged and fought over, shows hor for its followers scientology is a religion, whereas several governments have denied it legal status as a religion and sought to ban it
this shows that definitions of religion can be contested and are influenced by who has power to define the situation
dont assume religion always involved belief in god or the supernatural, or that it performs similar functions for everyone in all societies, allows them to get close to the meanings people themselves give to religion
accepted features of religion
beliefs
theology
practices
institutions
consequences
giddens definition of religion
‘set of symbols involving feelings of reverence and are linked to rituals or ceremonies engaged in by a community of beliefs
postmodernists approaches to religion
rapidly changing society, manned by class and uncertainty
meta-narrative are no longer adequate in the interests of the world
traditional factors have lost significance in understanding a globalised postmodern society (class, gender)
postmodern society characterised but individualism: choice, diversity and consumer culture
Global spiritual supermarket
vacuum of meaning
disneyification of religion - dilution of religion
postmodernism and science
no longer claim a suernaqty of its scientific methods and claims to enable an understanding of the work and has become discredited (Global warming, antibiotic resistance etc)
scientists selling the interest of the wealth rather than pursuing value free research
therefore lost its authority
postmodernism and lyotard - ideology
religion and science are meta-narratives. religious teachings are no longer accepted as ‘truth’ in modern society due to the growth of scientific facts
marxism- ideology
marx- revolution cannot occur until the working class develop a class consciousness
gramsci- ideological domination prevents class conciseness
abercrombie- a fear of unemployment may prevent rebelling
feminism- ideology
oakley- bowlbys maternal deprivation is an example of science acting as an ideology, justifying gender inequality as children are damaged by working mothers
Karl popper- science as an open belief system
hypothesis formation
falsification- disapproving hypothesis
predictions- deductive
theory formation
scrutiny
science is open to criticism, scrutiny and testing by others
criticisms- some sociologists see science as any belief system shaped by society
focuses on falsification for social facts
khun- science as a closed belief system
science is based on a single paradigm which is ridiculed if challenged, unless undermined by evidence
herberg- religion as an open belief system
able to adapt to social change
may dilute beliefs to stay relevant - known as internal secularisation
horton- religion as a closed belief system
it contains ‘clauses’ that prevent it from being disproved in the eyes of believers
polanyi and belief systems
beliefs are self-sustained as they have three devices to undermine any contradicting evidence:
circularity- explaining religious ideas by using other religious components
subsidiary explanations- religious leaders redirect focus when they are being challenged with some sort of explanation that does not contradict the religion
denial of legitimacy to rivals- reject rival beliefs to show followers they are the only possible answer
how do science and religion differ
positivism
objectivity
value freedom
research methodology
empirical evidence
scientific method
Comte- science as a belief system- different from other types of belief and relies upon evidence not faith
e.g. evolution
enlightenment and religious thinking
scientific idea create problems for religion
God cant be proved: relies upon belief rather than evidence
Frazer- believed the growth of scientific explanations of the world would cause religion to disappear
Bruce- scientific method has provided the suggested challenge to religion as a belief system . In modernity religion explanations are replaced by science as many religions are shown to be false
ideology as a belief system
‘set of ideas and value shared by a social group:provide a vision to interpret the world, political/incomplete or false view for reality’
pluralists ideology; set of views that reflect what no one ideology can
dominant ideology- justifies social advantages of wealthy power and influential (Marx)
patriarchal ideology; supports and justifies power of men (Feminists)
political ideology- analysis and interpretation of how society should work
scientism: science and methods can provide the knowledge to understand the world
religion as a conservative force: functionalism
value consensus- social solidarity
religions as meeting the functional prerequisites of society (basic needs). maintaining cultural traditions and basic needs of social life
bruce- cultural defence, defends community identity
suffering as Gods will or a challenge of faith, propel are less likely to challenge their circumstances
acts as a defence of traditional values and forms of behaviour → creates a collective consciousness; attitudes, sacred symbols,
conservtaive definition
aims to maintain (seeks to restore) traditional beliefs and customs and the status quo
durkheim religion as a conservative force
Gods were used as an expression of this influence over the individual. God is recognition that society is more important than the individual
the sacred and profane: key feature of religion was’t a belief in gods but a fundamental difference between sacred and profane found in all religions
sacred are things set apart and forbidden and inspire feelings of awe, fear and wonder and are surrounded by taboo and prohibition, invoke powerful feelings in believers indicates this is because they are symbols representing something of great power and worshipping it is like society and uniting believers into a single moral community
profane are things that have no special significance- ordinary and mundane
totems- sacred as its symbolically representative of the group itself, worshipping their society, social glue
studied the arunta aboriginal australian tribe with a clan of bands of kin who come together periodically to perform rituals involving worship of sacred totems, totem is the clans emblem, like something that represents the clans origins and identity
religion is important as it provides a set of beliefs and practices to invite people
civil religion will eventually take over: non religious rituals perform a similar function to religion: football, royalist.
religion is not only for social solidarity but also of our intellectual or cognitive capacities
collective conscience
durkheim’s view is that the sacred symbols represent societies collective conscience means both conscience and consciousness
collective conscience is the shared norms, values, beliefs and knowledge that male social life and cooperation between individuals possible- without these society would disintegrate
regular shred religious rituals reinforce the collective science and maintain social integration
shared rituals binds individuals together, reminding them they are part of a single moral community which they owe their loyalty
religion therefore performs a crucial role for the individual, making us feel part of something greater than ourselves, reinvigorates and strengthen us to face life’s trials and motivates us to overcome obstacles that would otherwise defeat us
criticisms of durkheim
evidence on totenism is unsound
worsley- there is no sharp division between the sacred and the profane and that different clans share the same totems, and even is durkheim is right about totenism, this doesn’t prove that he has discovered the essence of all other religions
may apply to small scale societies with a single religion but harder to apply to large scale where religion may be in conflict
postmodernists mestrovic- durkheims idea cannot be applied to contemporary society because increasing diversity has fragmented the collective conscience, so no longer a single shared value system for religion to reinforce
Malinowski (functionalism) religion
reinforces social norms and values→ social solidarity
answers to the ‘unanswerable’, gives security in the face of uncertainty'
identifies two types of situation in which religion perofmrs social solidairty:
where the outcome is important but is uncontrollable and this uncertain in his study of the trobriand islanders of western pacific, malinowski contrasts fishing in the lagoon and fishing in the ocean (lagoon is safe and predictable and successful method of posing when islanders fish in the lagoon, there is no ritual, ocean is dangerous and uncertain and rituals ensure safe and successful expedition, giving people some control)
at times of life crises: events such as birth, puberty, marriages and especially death mark major and disruptive changes in social groups, religion helps to minimise disruption
e.g. death- comfort and explanation, church attendances soars when at war
parsons (functionalism) religion
provide the core values of society to regulate peoples behaviour and restrict deviance and social change. moral belief→ socialisation
religion helps individuals cope with unforeseen events and uncontrollable outcomes:
creates and legimates societies central values
its the primary source of meaning
religion creates and legimtises societies basic norms and values by sacarlising them, in the usa protestantism has sacralised teh core american values of individualism, meritocracy and self discipline → promotes value consensus and social stability
allowing people to make sense of vents which threaten social stability
‘mechanism of judgement’- emotional adjustment at times of crisis
civil religion
bellah interested in how religion unites society, especially a multi faith society like america
what unifies american society is an overarching civil religion - a belief system that attaches sacred qualities to society itself, in america civil religion is a faith of americanism or the american way of life
civil religion integrates society in a way that americas many different churches cannot: pledges to allegiance of the flag, singing the national anthem, ‘one nation under god’
involves loyalty to the nation state and a belief in god
criticisms of functionalist definitions of religion
causing social change
secularisation: less than ½ believe in god
religion can have a negative effect- oppression
multi-faith and multi cultural society
religion can tear communities apart (NI, Islamic fundamentalism)
assumption that worship is a collective act: can be expressed individually
conservative Marxism as a religious force
‘sign of the oppressed creature the sentiment of a heartless world.. the soul of soulless condition. it is the opium of the people’
conservative force
not beneficial to society
ideological apparatus
ruling class legitimises their power
a feature of only a class divided socity
divine right of kings; justified power of kings as its gods will
Marxism: religions acting as an opium of the people
eases pain and oppression:
eventual escape: life after death, gods will, reward of afterlife, wont change their circumstances, test of faith
hope of supernatural intervention to some problems
justification and explanation of inequality: Indian caste system
marxism: religion as ideology
marx ideology is a belief system that distorts people’s perception of reality in ways that serve ruling class interest, class that controls economic production also controlled the production and distribution of ideas in society. through institutions such as the church, education and the media
religion operates as an ideological weapon used by the ruling class to legitimise the suffering of the poor as something inevitable and god-given - misleads the poor into believing their suffering is virtuous and that they will be favoured i n the afterlife
e.g. the rich man and lazarus and the idea that it’s easier for a camel to fit through the head of a needle than a rich man to get into heaven
lenin- describes religion as ‘spiritual gin’ which doled out the masses by the ruling class to keep them in their place, RC use religion cynically to manipulate the masses and keep them from attempting to overthrow the ruling class by creating a mystical fog that obscures reality
e.g. the divine right of kings
marxism: religion and alienation
alienation involves becoming separated from or losing control over something that one has produced or created
alienation exists in all class societies, but more extreme under capitalism as worker have no freedom to express their true nature and creative beings, emphasises under repeated mind numbing tasks and in dehumanizing conditions the explouates turn to religion as a form of consolation ‘opium of the people, its the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of the heartless world, the soul of soulless conditions, the spirit of a spiritless situation;
therefore religion arises out of suffering and acts as a consolation for it, but fails to deal with its causes, namely class exploitation
marxist view haley
Methodist religion played a key role in preventing a WC revolution in 29th century. most European countries during that time dealt with social change but not Britain. WC dissatisfaction was expressed by changing the church of England for Methodists
distracted from class grievances and encouraged to see enlightenment in spirituality
therefore inhibiting social chance
evidence supporting Marxist view of religion
leach- critical of C of E as it recruits from upper class- 80% of bishops privately educated, maintain unequal power
hook- Vatican’s stance on contraception causing problems in less developed countries
criticisms of Marxists role of religion
fails to consider secularisation: less than 10% of people attend church
failed to explain the existence of religion where it doesn’t appear to contribute to the oppression of a particular class
some religions have brought about radical movements: MLK
Neo Marxists have failed to recognise religions way in opposing the ruling class: churches as safe houses
interactionist and feminists religion as a conservative forces (Berger)
provides a universal meaning: set of belief and values to make sense of the world
gives individuals a sense of meaning in a chaotic world
provides a theodicy: sense of seemingly inexplicable things
‘sacred canopy’
interpretative: religion contributes to the maintenance of social stability in a conservative force
religion as a compensator interactionist
stark and barbridge: meets the needs of individuals when their sense of social order is disrupted
if individuals act a certain way the will be rewarded: life after death, future rewards,
it will therefore never dissapear as its crucial to teh stability of social life and is a conservtaive force
feminist view of religion
religious institutions are patriarchal and serve the interests of that
reflect patriarchal ideology, which in turn legitimises and reproduces male dominance
this is achieved by:
subordinate roles of women in scriptures
marginalisation of women
patriarchal doctrines with traditional gender roles
religious laws and customs
religious forms of feminism
woodhead criticises feminist explanations that simple equate religion with patriarchy and oppression of women, and patriarchy is not prominent in all religions arguing there are ‘religious forms of feminism’
gillat-ray: some young british muslim women choose to wear the hijab in order to gain parental approval to enter further education and especially employment. the hijab is also a symbol of liberation that allows them to enter the public sphere without being condemned for being immodest
women use religion to gain this and respect for their roles within the private sphere
brusco- in columbia, belonging to a pentecostal group can be empowering for some women, despite the strong belief traditional gender roles that such groups hold, women are able to use religion to increase their power e.g. a strong belief in pentecostals is men should respect women
piety movements (rinaldo) sees this pattern as typical of piety movements, conservative movements that support traditional teachings about womens role, modest dress, prayer and bible study including pentecostal and evangelical groups, arguing even with conservative religions women may find ways to further their own interests
liberal protestant organisations such as quakers and the unitarians are often committed to gender equality and women in leading roles, e.g c of e has had female priests since 1992 and female bishops since 2015- over 1/5 of priests are female
evidence of patriarchy in religion
religious organisations are male dominated, orthodox judaism and catholicism forbid women priests (armstrong sees women’s exclusion from priesthood as women’s marginalisation)
places of worship often segregate the sexes and marginalised women e.g. not allowed to preach or read sacred texts, menstruating women as taboo. holm describes this as devaluation of women in religion
sacred texts largely feature the doings of male gods, prophets etc and anti female stereotypes such as eve
religious laws and customs may give women fewer rights, divorce, spouse, decision making
religion as a conservative force
often seen as conservative in the sense of being traditional, defending traditional customs, institutions, moral views, roles etc. in other words it upholds traditional beliefs about how society should be organised
it is conservative because it functions to conserve or preserve things as they are, it stabilises society and maintains the status quo
religious beliefs:
conservative beliefs about moral issues and many oppose changes that promote individual freedom e.g. catholic church forbids divorce, abortion, contraception
similarly, most religions uphold family values and favour patriarchal domestic division of labour e.g. man as the head of the family was embedded in traditional marriage
religious functions:
religious and consensus: functionalists see religion as a conservative force preventing society from disintegrating, marxists and feminists see religion as an ideology that supports existing structures and prevent the less powerful from changing things
religion and capitalism: marx sees religion as a conservative ideology that prevents social change by legitimising or disguising exploitation and inequality
religion and patriarchy: feminists see religion as a conservative force because it acts an an ideology that legitimises patriarchal power
religion and social change: weber
the protestant work ethic and the spirit of capitalism where weber argues that the religious beliefs of calvinism helped to bring amount major social change
weber notes that many past societies had capitalism in the sense of greed for wealth
calvinist beliefs:
predestination: god has predetermined which souls would be saved- individuals could not do nothing whatever to change this
divine transcendence: god was so far above and beyond this world and so incomparably greater than any mortal, this included the church and its priests - leaving the calvinists ti feel ‘an unprecedented inner loneliness’
asceticism: this refers to abstinence, self-discipline and self-denial e.g. monks lead an ascetic existence, refraining from luxury
hinduism and confucim nmanism
religion as a force for social change: Weber and Neo Marxists
providing a moral foundation for religion: scriptures, social justice movements, liberation theology
organising and mobilising force: financial resources and communication channels, sustaining social movements, communal unity, leadership development
inspiring alternative social models: challenging prevailing norms, leads to wider social shifts, international communities, paganism, gender equality.
shaping cultural and economic values : Weber thesis on capitalism ‘the protestant ethic’ hard work, self discipline, ascetism,
force for change and for conservation: complex role, can act as a conservative force, resisting change, conflict and tension,
examples of social change
Civil Rights Movement, feminist movements (suffragettes gaining the vote), LGBT+ rights (same-sex marriage), and shifts to rise of recycling or attitudes towards smoking
MLK "revolution of values"
Weber and theodicies
Theodicy attempts to construct and deal with how belief systems work.This will outline the theological reasons for the existence of God and evil within society.
All of these theodicies have social consequences; Weber identified one particular theodicy that may have helped to facilitate dramatic social change. Weber was a social action theorist 🡪 evolution of new religious ideas can stimulate social & economic change
Calvinism is a form of Ascetic (self denying) Protestantism, with strong discipline, increase of Calvinism in Western Europe allowed for social change to happen, in the form of capitalism, through normative conditions (values)
Calvinism & Protestant Work Ethic
predestination, solution was to become involved in ‘intense worldly activity’ 🡪 hard work and material success were seen as religious virtues and a possible sign of being ‘chosen’
Emphasis on values: hard work, trade,profit,punctuality.avoidance of laziness→Led to capitalism 🡪 pursuit of wealth and making money BUT also focused on reinvestment in business = good capitalist behaviour and also excellent religious morality
weber and religion: leadership leading to social change
influential religious leaders who challenged legal rational authority – charismatic leaders in particular.
Charisma – people obey a religious leader due to qualities: Cults and sects, Jesus
Traditional – tradition and support: responsible for change in the face of modernising regimes (Afghanistan & Islamic Leaders)
Legal-rational – laws and regulations. Orders are only to be obeyed if they are relevant to the situation. Influence from leaders in the law system/government.
criticisms of weber
countries with alarge Calvinist population didn’t industrialise, like Norway.
Marshall pointed out that Weber did not claim that Calvinism caused capitalism, he only suggested that it was a major contributor.
slavery,colonialism and piracy were more important than Calvinist beliefs in accumulating the capital required for industrialisation.
Kautsky,capitalism,predates Calvinism. capitalists attracted to Calvinism it made their interests appear legitimate.
Neo Marxism and fundamentalism
in order to control society you will need to persuade the masses that the existing system is good and fair for everyone.
GRAMSCI HEGEMONY: ideological control that the ruling class elite have over the masses.
BUT 🡪 dual character
Counter Hegemony 🡪 some clergy may act as intellectuals who support WC organisations such as trade unions
Liberation Theory & Maduro
some Neo-Marxists question the view that religion is always a conservative force…..
Maduro believes that religion can be a revolutionary force that brings about change: clergy could provide guidance for the oppressed in their struggle with dominant groups, religiosity inspired social change
evaluation of Neo Marxists religion as social change
depends on how social change is defined
Overlooks the power of the ruling class to use religion to keep their status in society and use religion and other institutions as ISAs
World-affirming groups
accept society as it is and offer individuals the opportunity for self improvement within it.
World-accommodating groups
accept the dominant norms and values of society, and members will live similar lifestyle to others members of society.
World-rejecting groups
opposition to the world and reject many of the dominant norms and values of society and replace them with alternative beliefs and practices.
Religious Organisations
Sociologists have based the categorisation on the following:
Structure
Relationship with the state
Attitudes to wider society
Size
Membership
Commitment from members
sects and cults
Are seen as more deviant – involve beliefs or behaviour that is seen as odd, weird or bizarre or they are a threat to existing society.
Sect and cult are often used interchangeably in the media. Barker 1989 – terms have a stigmatised and negative meaning (extremists, brainwashed, harmful, robots), they should be abandoned.
sects
wilson- exist in a state of tension or conflict with wider society, tests of merit on their members, exercises stern discipline regulating the beliefs, total commitment, charismatic leader
monopoly of truth, aim to transform society, less organised than a church, more exclusive, usually break away from a major church
cults
wallis and bruce:
loose knit groupings open to all
Highly individualistic – Giddens 2006
Little discipline or commitment
Aldridge 2007 – cults offer one route of realisation among many.
Followers as clients or customers
embrace a wide range of beliefs some of which may be non religious
highly critical of societal values, opposition to mainstream church, charismatic, tolerant of other belief systems, focus on individual needs, loosely organised, individualistic, new and independent
church and denominations
church: accepting/ conservative, strict hierarchy and highly organised, very large, monopoly of truth, minimal commitment, often closely liked to the state/government, refers to major world religions, closest to the state traditional religion end
denominations: generally accepting, organised but less so than a church, smaller than a church, tolerant of other belief system, more commitment than a church, no formal link to the state, often formed from a sect, sits between a church and a sect
types of cults
stark and barbridge:
Audience Cults – provide little beyond services for an individual, consumed individually and spread by the media
Client Cults – more organisation and offer services such as therapy
Cult Movements – more organised, wider range of activities, support, involvement and commitment (Scientology)
new age movements
diverse spiritual subcultures emphasising self-spirituality, individuality, personal growth, late modernity as alternatives to traditional, hierarchical religions. Key sociological themes include detraditionalisation, individualism (pick-and-mix spirituality, "spiritual shopping"), and a focus on self-help
gender and belief
women are generally more religious than men, but it still expresses an element of male dominance. davie; images of god men see god as more powerful and as a god of power and control whereas women see god as of love, comfort and forgiveness
sexuality and religion
women’s sexuality is felt to be dangerous by many religions, women’s periods and births leads to them having greater capacity to ‘pollute’, presence distracts men
turner- a disciplinary role with respect to sexuality is central, degree of policy the body in religion, importance of asceticism in religion.
AO2: catholic priests abstinence, nuns married to god
patriarchy in religion
religious scriptures/organisations: written and interpreted by men, anti female, male domination in organisations
patriarchal doctrines
places of worshipping: segregated sexes
veiling of women
women as pollution/ temptresses
religious laws and customs: regulate norms and traditions, domestic and reproductive role
Armstrong- exclusion of women from priesthood as evidence for marginalisation
however, may religions place women at the centre, Kali (Hindu goddess), Egyptian goddesses, feminist cults
ethnicity and religion
family pressures
examples of ethnic minority groups in societies that have higher levels of religiosity
belonging in ethnic groups means that religion can become an important sense of community and solidarity
maintains cultural identities
socialisation can maintain strong pressure on cultures to maintain religious commitments
deals with oppression
case study examples of ethnicity and religion: john bird
Pentecostalism has played a duel role for Afro Caribbean people in British society: enabled them to cope with racism in society
opium for the people
beaford suggests it gives them a sense of hope and independence
pyrce argues it encourages hard work, sexual morality, prudent management of finances, support of the family
Islamophobia
twin towers, war on terror
52% of USA dont respect Muslims
38% of uk dont respect Muslims
1 in 4 muslims in us, France, UK arent treated fairly
murza et al; increase in religiosity and identification with islam
greater identification with 2nd and 3rd generation shown by:
greater wearing of the hijab
greater identification with worldwide Muslim communities
growing membership of political Muslim groups
demands for education, financial and legal arrangements with sharia law: British foreign law, decline of other sources of identity, multicultural policies: invasion of Iraq, trade unions, important to recognise, respect cultural differences, more faith schools
English church census: 18,750 churches
83% of churchgoers are white, 10% black, 7% other
non white church attendance has increased by 19% since 1998, white churchgoing has decreased by 19%
black church attendance is 3X the proportion of the population
3500 churches closed from 2014-24
Pentecostal involvement has increased 30%
social class and religion
not much reliable info
traditional Marxists- biggest among deprived social classes
Weber theodicy of disprivelledge- highest to the disadvantaged and marginalised
established churches are mc dominated- leaders tend to be privileged
youstov- 60% churchgoers mc, 38% wc
sects attract more from marginalised groups, cults attract a cross section
age and religion + AO3
religiosity among young people has diminished
71% 18-24 say they have no religion
young Muslims: Islamic identify in young people, Muslim identity strong across all ages, 72% have a strong identity
Mayo: despite decline in religiosity increase in spirituality stays continuing among young people
buther- cultural hybridity, greater freedom from the patriarchal attitudes expressed by many white girls
defining secularisation- wilson
the processes whereby religious beliefs, practices, institutions lose social significance
statistics for secularisation in the uk
46.2% religious, 37.2% non religious
5% go to church regularly
average age of a churchgoer in the uk is 65
1650 churches closed between 1970-2002
islam is the fastest growing religion in the uk
75% claimed to never have been influenced by a religious leader
substantative definition of religion = belief in a supernatural force (secualrisation)
wilson- secularisation because people accept more rational explanations of the world
good- conforms to a widespread view of religion as a belief in god
bad- no room for religious practices that perform similar functions, western bias
functional definition of religion= defines in terms of its societal effect (secularisation)
wilson- rejects secularisation because religion still exists, perhaps in different forms to different traditional religions
good- aligns to a wide range of beliefs and practices that perform functions such as integration, no non-western bias
bad- just because of integration doesnt make it a religion e.g. charity or football
secularisation
hauman- age of faith; increases religious communal, focus on the religious behaviour of the elites (more documentation), less information on majority of population, The past has no more or less religious than the present
restriction on non religious behaviour on a Sunday: freedom has increased within a multicultural society
religion in america
wilson-45% got to church on sundays, however argues its still secularised as religion has become superficial
burce- america is becoming more secular society: declining church attendance, secularisation from within, religious diversify
religious market theory
stark and bainbridge; golden age of religion has been suggested, but propose a religious market theory based;
People are naturally religious and religion meets humans needs
human nature to seek rewards and avoids costs
cycle of renewable: stark and bainbridge
secularisation: religious organisations move to fit in with the new secular views → innovation: people turn to different organisation such as NRMs → revival: revolutionised are renewed as organisations rebuild religious influence in society → new religious or beliefs becomes more organised and bureaucratic: secularisation begins again
therefore religion never dies or disappears: fundamental need, religious compensators
berger - scared canopy
yinger- inanswerable questions
global secularisation
religion is as overwhelming and dominant as ever (84% of the world population affiliated with a religion)
too much focus on westernised industrial churches
predictions that by 2050 fewer people will be unaffiliated with a religion: 2010- 16% 2050- 13%
religious revival: evangelical, Muslims
evidence for secularisation
decline of religious beliefs and thinking: rationalisation
bruce: scientific explanations, more rational thinking, in organised and religion as a last resort
weber: growing disenchantment, desacralisation of consciousness- too rational to experience a sense of sacredness and mystery in life
decline of religious practices: less attachment, declining christian membership and attendance, decline of Sunday school
voas an crockett- belief and belonging is falling at a similar rate
decline of religious institutions:
bruce- church in middle ages was a dominating social institution, christian festivals have little meaning, decline in churches, decline in religion in schools
herberg- secularisation from within religious institutions
bryman- disneyfication of religion: diluted form of religion
other evidence:
fragmentation of beliefs: wide diveristt of beliefs
growth in indiviual spirituality : lyotard (metanarrative of religion has lost its power, pick n mix of beliefs), bruce (most involvementis shallow and not an alterntaive to traditional religion)
decline in religious knowledge
against secularisation
resacralisation: greely ‘renewal or continuity of religious beliefs’
traditional thinking decreased but other thinking has increased: biery sects 2.4% in 2000, 3.1% in 2010
people are believing in ‘hybrids’ (post-modernity) to suit needs
individuation: davie ‘believing without belonging’
traditonal religion remains strong: values from religion staying string in the uk: growing Pentecostalism, evangelical is the fastest growing denomination. fundamental beliefs and religion cant be argued as being ‘watered down’
cultural defence and transition: high religiosity among ethic minorities, cultural defence, cultural transition
fundamentalism
characteristics: authoritative sacred text, aggressive reaction, use of modern tech, patriarchy, prophecy, conspiracy
modernity; davie- trad beliefs threatened, giddens- reaction to globalisation, bauman- response in post modernity- freedom of choice
secular fundamentalism- davie; optimism of enlightenment since 1970s under attack, concerns about environment led to a loss in faith, france- bans on hijabs, yugoslavia- ethnic cleansing
clash of civilisations
globalisation in India- economic growth, Hindu consumerism
Pentecostalism in Latin america
globalisation of religion