1/66
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
ADME
Absorption
cross gut membrane; not too polar, not too big
ADME
Distribution
enter bloodstream; not stuck in fat or urine
ADME
Metabolism
interaction with body; cannot be destroyed by digestive enzymes (immediately), not reactive/unstable
ADME
Excretion
not too fast, tiny & polar
Lipinsk’s Rule of 5
<= 5 H-bond donors (more donors => more polar => poor absorption)
<= 10 H-bond acceptors (more acceptors => more polar => poor absorption)
MW <= 500 Da (too large => poor absorption)
log(P_ict/water)=log([solute]_oct/[solute]_un-ionized water) <= 5 (increase hydrophobicity => sticks in fat)
Methods of Data Collection for Small Molecule Variants
Assay/HTS - Brute Force
testing a large number of biochemical screens showing small-molecule target interaction; pros: reproducible, controlled, practical, low cost; cons: need large amount of target & test compounds, false-positives
Methods of Data Collection for Small Molecule Variants
Fragment-based Design
connecting known fragments that bind to the target; slightly more targeted than Assays, but still sort of brute-forced
Methods of Data Collection for Small Molecule Variants
Structure Activity Relationships (SARs)
take variations of molecules and run through the assay; learn which molecules increase/decrease activity; step to improve compound designs
Methods of Data Collection for Small Molecule Variants
Pharmacore
identify chemical motifs of reference molecule and match to candidates
Methods of Data Collection for Small Molecule Variants
Docking - More Targeted
modeling to determine interactions of small-molecule variants and target; shape-complementary, but computationally expensive; uses fast Fourier transforms
Challenges of Engineering Small-Molecule Drug Candidates
Scoring
degree in which a small molecule will effectively interact with the target; approximations of energy (sum of 1 and 2 body effects), neglects the role of solvent/water, doesn’t account for entropy, desolvation, polarization, surface area
Challenges of Engineering Small-Molecule Drug Candidates
Sampling
ensuring all forms are accounted for; positions of small molecule, rotamers, backbone flexibility (assumed rigid)
Engineering Therapeutic Biomolecules
Experimental Screen - Brute Force
quantify performance of (many) isolated variants; assay; pros: datasets, focus/control; cons: low capacity (hundreds to thousands)
Engineering Therapeutic Biomolecules
Experimental Selection
link variant performance to natural selection, apply condition to library of variants —> recover and sequence survivors; pros: high capacity (millions to trillions); cons: no data, complex setup
Engineering Therapeutic Biomolecules
Antibody Development
choose target —> inject purified target into animal model —> isolate b-cells which produce unique antibody —> screen and test —> humanization —> manufacturing (scaffold, injection)
Engineering Therapeutic Biomolecules
Antibody Development - Pros & Cons
pros: mouse does work for you => no computational model, clinical success; cons: less control over epitope, large molecules, expensive, low patient response
Engineering Therapeutic Biomolecules
Computational Protein Design - Most Targeted
generates protein shapes, then fits amino acids to stabilize; given sequence —> predict structure, given structure —> predict sequence; invent new shapes => create perfect binding protein for almost any target instead of searching for one
Engineering Therapeutic Biomolecules
Computational Protein Design - Pros & Cons
pros: targeted, smaller => easier to manufacture and administer, no animal model; cons: energy function accuracy, slow validation, reliability, large design/search space
Macromolecular Therapeutic Molecules
Most Commonly used
proteins/peptides, monoclonal antibodies (-mab, cell receptors), enzymes, pathogen ribosomes (for antibiotics, cannot make proteins)
Macromolecular Therapeutic Molecules
Immunogenicity
solve via humanization: replace bits of mouse antibody with human equivalent, keep parts that recognizes target
Challenges of Large Macromolecules as Drugs
Production
growing mammalian cells are harder and more time-consuming, proper glycosylation, purification
Challenges of Large Macromolecules as Drugs
Formulation
many shapes and rotations; stabilize native protein shape for long periods of time, at high concentrations, and varying temperatures
Challenges of Large Macromolecules as Drugs
Delivery
difficult to deliver sufficient doses of large molecules => long injection times or large needles
Drug Development Process
Discovery
target identification (selecting known or hypothesizing) —> target validation (critical to disease, modulation of target have effects, in vitro/vivo) —> assay development —> hits to leads (solubility, specificity, stability, toxicity) —> IND filling
Drug Development Process
Development - Clinical Trials
Phase I: toxicity, single ascending dose (SAD, one dose each of increasing doses), MAD (repeated doses); Phase II: measurable effect and correct dosing
Drug Development Process
Full Development - Clinical Trials
Phase III: compare to the best alternative or placebo, some may be marketed; Phase IV: post-market surveillance and unique populations
Mass Transport
Flux/Diffusion
dependent on the diffusion coefficient and concentration gradient, moves down the concentration gradient
Mass Transport
Non-Biological (in Vitro)
lower chemical concentrations and fewer chemical species; defined reaction pathways; uniform flux
Mass Transport
Biological (In Vivo)
many chemical species; nonuniform concentrations, sizes, and properties; many reaction pathways that change over time and different in different locations;
Momentum Transport
Non-Biological
uniform flow rates; uniform and rigid pipes; external control systems (valves, sensors)
Momentum Transport
Biological
pulsatile flow; microscale interactions; flexible and inconsistant vessels; complex control systems
Fluid Dynamics
Non-Biological
simple, Newtonian fluids
Fluid Dynamics
Biological
complex aqueous fluids (cells, proteins) => non-Newtonian
Transport Modes
Diffusion
movement of molecules down a concentration gradient
Transport Modes
Convection
bulk fluid motion
Transport Modes
Active Transport
requires energy/ATP; against concentration gradient; through proteins and/or pumps
Transport Modes
Passive Transport
membrane mediated; down gradient
Transport Modes
Vesicular Transport
endo and exocytosis; large molecules
Transport Modes
Filtration
pressure-driven across membranes
Transport Modes
Energy Transport
heat conduction/dissipation
Pharmacokinetics
what the body does to the drug; study of the uptake of drugs, their biotransformation, distribution, metabolism, and elimination
Pharmacodynamics
what the drug does to the body; study of the biochemical and physiological effects of the drug, mechanisms of drug action, and the relationship between drug concentration and effect
Pharmacokinetics
Key Physiological Processes
ADME
Pharmacokinetics
Central Volume of Distribution (Vc)
hypothetical volume into which a drug initially distributes upon administration
Pharmacokinetics
Peripheral Volume (Vt)
sum of all tissue spaces outside the central compartment
Pharmacokinetics
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vd)
volume of fluid that would be required to account for all the drug in the body
Pharmacokinetics
Simple Compartment Models
if a drug rapidly equilibriates; only uses Vd, half-life
Pharmacokinetics
Two-Compartment Models
if a drug exhibits a slow equilibration with peripheral tissues; distribution phase: drug is moving from the central volume to the tissue; the elimination phase: predominant process, looks straight on log plot because it is a first-order (exponential) process
Pharmacokinetics
Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Models
compartments represent tissues connected by flows (Q); generate material balance equations for species of interest, accounting for effects like metabolism, diffusion, etc.; example: BBB
Cardio Transport
Components Relative to Conservation of Mass Transport
mass transport = diffusion + convection + reaction
Cardio Transport
Fick’s Law
flux of molecules move down the concentration gradient, and relies on the diffusion coefficient
Cardio Transport
What Influences the Diffusion Coefficient
concentration, size, medium, temperature
Cardio Transport
Measuring Diffusivity
track molecule and measure mean square displacement (disregards left or right movement, <x>²=2Dt); measure distance traveled and time
Cardio Transport
Reaction Rates - 1st Order
A —k1—> B + C; exponential decay (log(C) vs t)
Cardio Transport
Reaction Rates - 2nd Order
A + A/B —k2—> C + D; hyperbolic decay for two of the same components (1/C vs t)
Cardio Transport
Oxygen Transport in Insects
large surface area of air ducts compared to volume; 1 or 2-way ventilation; mostly diffusion with some pumping => low metabolic demands
Cardio Transport
Oxygen Transport in Salamanders/Small Organisms
large surfcace area to body volume => breath through skin => diffusion => dries out -=> release mucous; cold blooded => less O2 => less metabolic demand
Cardio Transport
Oxygen Transport in Fish
1-way gas exchange; diffusion and convection
Cardio Transport
Cilia
carry mucous up airways
Cardio Transport
Mucous
keeps cells moist and captures particles; gel and sol layers
Cardio Transport
Surfactant
lowers surface tension => equilibriates air flow and stabilizes alveoli => reduces effort to inflate
Cardio Transport
Partial Pressure
mole fraction*total pressure; essentially gives concentration
Cardio Transport
Partial Pressure through the Body in mmHg
air: Po2=40, Pco2=46 —> alveoli: Po2=105, Pco2=40 —> Po2=100, Pco2=40 —> Po2<40, Pco2>46 —> Po2=40, Pco2=46
Cardio Transport
Filtration Pressures
dominated by BHP; BHP = 35 mmHg, IFOP = 1 mmHg
Cardio Transport
Absorption Pressures
dominated by BCOP; BCOP = 26 mmHg. IFHP = 0 mmHg
Cardio Transport
Net Transport
NFP = BHP+IFOP-BCOP-IFHP (filtration-absorption)
Cardio Transport
Purpose of Lymphatic System
maintain tissue fluid balance; immune cell trafficking (B and T cells); lipid transport