Social psych exam 3

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall with Kai
GameKnowt Play
New
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/141

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

142 Terms

1
New cards

What personality characteristics make people persuasive?

self-confidence, credibility and likability

2
New cards

What characteristics make verbal messages persuasive?

clarity, evidence, emotional appeal, repetition and call to action

3
New cards

When is a two-sided message the most persuasive?

by providing both sides and addressing the points that are inconsistent with your argument

4
New cards

How can someone resist persuasion?

being aware, generating counterarguments, attitude inoculation and critical thinking

5
New cards

The Sleeper Effect.

when persuasion isn’t effective at first but sinks in over time

6
New cards

Are emotional appeals typically long-lasting or not? Why?

no because once the emotion fades over time, people will forget the message or question their decision because it wasn’t based on fact or logic

7
New cards

When are fear messages successfully used in persuasion?

smoking campaigns

8
New cards

What is the outcome of a persuasive appeal from an admired person?

increased influence and greater attitude change

9
New cards

norm of reciprocity

gives the target a gift or does them a favor, then follows up with a request which will make the person motivated to reciprocate

10
New cards

Provide an example of how norm of reciprocity could be used to manipulate someone.

a friend helps you with studying for a test, so you should help them with homework or buy them food to say thank you

11
New cards

“Door in the Face” Technique

someone makes an unreasonable request but follows up with a reasonable request, this person is likely to accept the more reasonable request

12
New cards

Provide an example of how door in the face technique could be used to manipulate someone:

Friend “Can you lend me $100?” You: “Whoa, I can’t do that!” Friend: “Okay, no problem — could you at least lend me $10?”

13
New cards

“That’s Not All!” Technique

offering a price on a product, following up with something extra included to make it seem like the person is getting a deal

14
New cards

Provide an example of how the that’s not all technique could be used to manipulate someone

buying a new phone for $1000 but getting a free case and screen protector

15
New cards

“Foot in the Door” Technique

getting a small commitment then following up with a bigger commitment, which is likely to make a larger commitment after making the small one

16
New cards

Provide an example of how the foot in the door technique could be used to manipulate someone

someone selling a vacuum may ask the person to listen for a few mistunes, then after ask if they’re interested in purchasing the vacuum

17
New cards

“Throwing a Low-Ball” Technique

deciding on an exchange, follow up with something ‘unexpected’ and people are more likely to back out

18
New cards

Provide an example of how throwing a low ball technique could be used to manipulate someone.

low-balling the price of a used car, but adding fees that make the car more expensive than the original stated price

19
New cards

“Bait and Switch” Technique

make an attractive offer, following up with a less appealing alternative and people are unlikely to back out

20
New cards

Provide an example of how the bait and switch technique could be used to manipulate someone.

landlord post a beautiful apartment for cheap rent but when a person is interested suddenly the apartment is unavailable but a smaller apartment which is more expensive is available

21
New cards

Milgram’s shock experiment

showed how powerful authority is in getting people to

obey

22
New cards

when were teachers most likely to deliver maximum shock?

when the authority figure was in the same room in a lab coat and giving direct orders with a firm voice

23
New cards

who took full responsibility for consequences in the Milgrim shock experiment

the authority figure

24
New cards

why is it important who took full responsibility for consequences in the Milgrim shock experiment

shows that obedience increased when people feel less personally responsible for their actions - people are more likely to follow orders even if they hurt someone

25
New cards

Psychological reactance define

happens when people feel like their freedom to choose is being taken away so they do the opposite of what their being told to do

26
New cards

Forbidden toys experiment (Aronson and Carlsmith 1963):

children were shown toys and were told not to play with their second favorite

some children received a mild threat if they disobeyed “Please don't play with your second favorite toy while I'm gone"

some children received a severe threat if they disobeyed“ you better not play with your second favorite toy while I'm gone or else!”

Mild threat group: convinced them selves the toy wasn't so great

Severe threat group: desire remained high for the toy

27
New cards

how effective is the “enhanced interrogation techniques” and why:

it is largely ineffective because the limited effectiveness for gaining accurate information, psychological harm, moral and ethical issues. people understand intense pressure might provide false or incomplete information

28
New cards

how can negative moods make people vulnerable to influence?

desire for relief, reduced critical thinking and increased compliance

29
New cards

whats the most powerful mood?

fear

30
New cards

negative state relief hypothesis:

people are more likely to agree to a request with someone when they are in a negative mood if doing so will relieve their negative

feelings

31
New cards

aggression define:

any behavior intended to harm or cause injury to someone, physical or psychologically

32
New cards

4 types of aggressive behavior:

emotional direct, emotional indirect, instrumental

direct and instrumental indirect

33
New cards

emotional direct

a man punches a peer who insults him

34
New cards

emotional indirect

a man pours a soft drink on an enemy’s keyboard

35
New cards

instrumental direct

a man shoots a clerk while committing a robbery

36
New cards

instrumental indirect

a man posts intimate photos of his girlfriend on Facebook

to impress his friends

37
New cards

relationship between aggression and testosterone:

higher levels of testosterone can be found in aggressive boys and violent criminals

38
New cards

How does socioeconomic status impact the relationship between aggression and testosterone?

Low SES often increases the likelihood that high testosterone will lead to aggression, while high SES can buffer or redirect those tendencies into non- aggressive forms of competition.

39
New cards

How do females primarily demonstrate aggressive tendencies?

more covert and socially directed ‘relational aggression’

40
New cards

How do males primarily demonstrate aggressive tendencies?

physically

41
New cards

Robber’s Cave Study:

how competition creates intergroup hostility but cooperation toward shares goals can help overcome and foster positive relationships violence

42
New cards

relationship between aggression and the culture of honor:

aggression can be used as a tool to defend one’s reputation or social standing

43
New cards

are rural or urban areas more likely to respond with greater aggression to minor insults?

rural

44
New cards

how to violent video games impact violent behaviors and perception of violence?

normalizing violence and modeling aggression. can be associated with hitting other students, aggressive thoughts and feelings etc

45
New cards

correlation between a nation’s gun ownership rates and homicide rates:

the more people that have guns the more homicides there have been

46
New cards

kitty genovese - the case:

a young woman living in Queens, New York, was attacked and murdered outside her apartment building. Reports at the time claimed that dozens of 4 bystanders (later found to be exaggerated) saw or heard parts of the attack but failed to help or call the police.

47
New cards

whats the explanation for the inaction of bystanders during this case?

everyone assumed someone else would call the police, pluralistic ignorance, fear of judgement/ social influence

48
New cards

altruism

selfless concern for the weak-being of others - individual who helps someone else without expecting a reward or benefit

49
New cards

evolutionary basis for altruism:

increased the chances of passing on shared genes or

promoting mutual cooperation.

50
New cards

are individuals in urban or rural communities more or less likely to assist someone in need of assistance?

rural

51
New cards

why are individuals in rural communities more likely to assist someone in need of assistance?

tighter social networks, social norms and culture and fewer distractions.

52
New cards

evolutionary basis for group living:

survival in ancestral environment, collective action ,shared reality,

53
New cards

in computer simulations, how do group dynamics play out over time?

interactions between individuals can lead to changes in behaviors, cooperation and leadership overtime

54
New cards

minority groups are able to influence majority groups by

consistency, social validation, confidence & commitment, gradual change and social networks.

55
New cards

groupthink:

psychological phenomenon that occurs when a group of people makes faulty or irrational decisions because the desire for harmony or conformity within the group leads to an irrational consensus.

56
New cards

example of groupthink

the bay of pigs invasion 1961

57
New cards

characteristics that promote groupthink/group mind:

high group cohesion, insulation of the group, lack of impartial leadership etc

58
New cards

strategies that exist to reduce/prevent groupthink:

open debate and dissent, open communication, encourage independent thinking, subgroups etc

59
New cards

social facilitation:

people tend to perform better on tasks when they are in the

presence of others, especially if the task is simple or well-practiced.

60
New cards

example of social facilitation

example: basketball player practicing by himself vs with a crowd watching

61
New cards

deindividuation:

self-awareness resulting in decreased self-regulation and greater

conformity to surrounding group norms

62
New cards

examples of deindividualization

sporting events, concerts, war

63
New cards

why do highly competent groups make poor decisions?

overconfidence bias, groupthink, cognitive dissonance etc

64
New cards

Conformity - define:

act of changing one's behavior, beliefs, or attitudes to match those of a group, in response to real or perceived social pressure.

65
New cards

compliance

change in behavior or attitude due to a direct request from another person, usually without any form of authority.

66
New cards

obedience

form of social influence where an individual follows a direct order or command from an authority figure

67
New cards

difference between conformity and compliance

compliance doesn’t use authority to change a behavior or attitude while obedience does

68
New cards

Asch’s study on judging line lengths, and its surprising results:

showed how people tend to conform to the group even when the group's opinion is clearly wrong. This has major implications for understanding social behavior, peer pressure, and the dynamics of group influence.

69
New cards

individuals within a social network

nodes/vertices

70
New cards

social ties within a social network

connections/ relations

71
New cards

clique within a social network

cluster of densely interconnected individuals

72
New cards

bridge within a social network

individual who connects two parts of a network

73
New cards

number of connections within a social network

related to satisfaction from group membership

74
New cards

prejudice:

negative attitude or feeling toward a person or group based solely on their membership in a particular group (such as race, gender, religion, or age).

75
New cards

example of prejudice

manager at a store assumes older employees aren’t good with

technology

76
New cards

stereotypes

:beliefs about group members’ characteristics

77
New cards

example of stereotypes

all florida girls are blonde

78
New cards

discrimination

action or behavior that treats people unfairly depending on group

membership

79
New cards

example of discrimination

landlord refusing to rent an apartment to someone because of race even though they meet all the requirements

80
New cards

which personality traits are most commonly associated with prejudiced attitudes?

authoritarian personality, social dominance orientation, high conformity

81
New cards

level of action description (Maass et al 1996)

explains how people describe behaviors differently depending on their biases — especially toward in-groups (their own group) vs. out-groups (other groups).

82
New cards

how might a prejudiced person describe positive behavior by an out-group member?

use specific or temporary descriptions to downplay

83
New cards

example of how a prejudiced person would describe positive behavior by an out-group member?

Instead of saying “She is kind,” they might say “She helped that one person today.”

84
New cards

What about negative behavior by an out-group member?

use broad and permanent descriptions

85
New cards

Negative behavior by an out-group member example

Instead of saying “He got mad this time,” they might say “He is

violent.”

86
New cards

stereotype threat:

fear that you may confirm a stereotype about your own group

87
New cards

example of stereotype threat

A female student takes a math test after being told “girls usually don’t do as well in math.”

88
New cards

behavior confirmation:

prejudice being a self-fulfilling prophecy

89
New cards

behavior confirmation example

joe expects his co worker nancy to be more emotional so he talks to her in a soft condescending tone

90
New cards

sub typing:

people create a special "exception" category for someone who doesn’t fit their stereotype — instead of changing the stereotype itself.

91
New cards

example of sub typing

Oprah and Obama

92
New cards

out-group homogeneity:

the tendency to see members of other groups (out-groups) as all the same — while seeing members of your own group (in-group) as diverse and unique.

93
New cards

out-group homogeneity example

all kids in the rival school are rude and stuck-up

94
New cards

in-group heterogeneity:

the tendency to see people in your own group as very

different and unique — even if outsiders see you as all the same.

95
New cards

in-group heterogeneity example

we’re not the same, some of us like action games, some like puzzles and some are casual players

96
New cards

out-group derogation:

when people put down, dislike, or discriminate against people

from a different group (the out-group), often to boost their own group’s status.

97
New cards

factors that may contribute to increased out-group derogation:

competition for resources, threat to in-group identity, social comparison and stereotypes and prejudice

98
New cards

superordinate goals:

presenting a group with a task / challenge that can only be achieved if everyone works together

99
New cards

how superordinate goals operate to reduce bias:

encourages teamwork and positive contact

100
New cards

role of superordinate goals in the Robber’s Cave Study:

turned hostile groups into cooperative allies by creating a situation where working together was the only way to succeed, helping to reduce bias and hostility.