1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
aim
to see whether children would imitate the aggressive behaviour of an adult
to look at gender differences in learning of aggression
method and design
lab experiment
controlled observation
matched pairs design
sample
72 children (36 boys and 36 girls)
aged 3-5 years
variables
IV’s :
3 model conditions
aggressive, non aggressive and control
male / female model and male / female child
DV :
aggressive acts observed
physical, verbal, partial, non
covert observation
procedure
stage 1 :
child taken to room to set out for play
adult taken to opposite corner of room with small table, chair, tinker toy, mallet and bobo doll
non aggressive - ignored bobo doll and quietly played with other toys
aggressive - after 1 minute playing peacefully, acted aggressively towards bobo doll
stage 2 :
child subjected to ‘mild aggression arousal’
after being left to play with toys, experimenter comes in and tells them to stop as those toys are for other children
stage 3 :
child taken to room with lots of toys (aggressive and non aggressive)
child left for 20 mins
observations made at 5 second intervals
results
after watching an aggressive female model, girls showed violent behaviour 52 times and boys did 70 times
after watching a male aggressive model, girls were violent 45 times and boys were violent 119 times
in the non aggressive female condition, girls were aggressive 19 times and boys were aggressive 69 times
in the non aggressive male condition, girls were aggressive 9 times and boys were aggressive 62 times
in the control experiment with no model, girls showed violent behaviour 36 times and boys were violent 70 times
overall higher aggression is shown after watching an aggressive act
conclusions
children exposed to the aggressive models showed significantly more imitation of physical and verbal aggressive behaviour then children in the non aggressive or control conditions
gender of the model did influence the children’s behaviour, they were more likely to cope the behaviour of a same sex model
overall biys showed more aggressive behaviour than girls
sampling bias
all children from Stanford uni nursery
similar backgrounds so possibly can’t generalise to wider population
slightly small sample
validity
validity lowered due to previous mild aggressive arousal
high ecological as room set up with toys for children and playing is normal task for them
high internal as genuine behaviour shown
ethics
children can’t give their own consent, parents did for them
these children may be more aggressive as a result as they may learn the behaviour (socially sensitive)
research method
controlled observation
high level of control e.g. matching all ppts at the same base level of aggression
type of data
quantitative data - number of children that imitated behaviour, genders recorded
easy to analyse and compare
but no quantitative so lacks insight
reliability
high reliability
all had mild aggressive arousal before observed
used standardise procedures
practical applications
shows the importance of early environment on shaping behaviour
teaching practices (who is a child most likely to imitate)
age ratings, films, video games
parenting
9pm watershed in the uk
ethnocentrism
is ethnocentric
as research from America
similar socioeconomic background
but not really an issue as not trying to generalise any cultural influences to anywhere else