developmental : bandura

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/14

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

15 Terms

1
New cards

aim

  • to see whether children would imitate the aggressive behaviour of an adult

  • to look at gender differences in learning of aggression

2
New cards

method and design

  • lab experiment

  • controlled observation

  • matched pairs design

3
New cards

sample

  • 72 children (36 boys and 36 girls)

  • aged 3-5 years

4
New cards

variables

IV’s :

  • 3 model conditions

  • aggressive, non aggressive and control

  • male / female model and male / female child

DV :

  • aggressive acts observed

  • physical, verbal, partial, non

  • covert observation

5
New cards

procedure

stage 1 :

  • child taken to room to set out for play

  • adult taken to opposite corner of room with small table, chair, tinker toy, mallet and bobo doll

  • non aggressive - ignored bobo doll and quietly played with other toys

  • aggressive - after 1 minute playing peacefully, acted aggressively towards bobo doll

stage 2 :

  • child subjected to ‘mild aggression arousal’

  • after being left to play with toys, experimenter comes in and tells them to stop as those toys are for other children

stage 3 :

  • child taken to room with lots of toys (aggressive and non aggressive)

  • child left for 20 mins

  • observations made at 5 second intervals

6
New cards

results

  • after watching an aggressive female model, girls showed violent behaviour 52 times and boys did 70 times

  • after watching a male aggressive model, girls were violent 45 times and boys were violent 119 times

  • in the non aggressive female condition, girls were aggressive 19 times and boys were aggressive 69 times

  • in the non aggressive male condition, girls were aggressive 9 times and boys were aggressive 62 times

  • in the control experiment with no model, girls showed violent behaviour 36 times and boys were violent 70 times

  • overall higher aggression is shown after watching an aggressive act

7
New cards

conclusions

  • children exposed to the aggressive models showed significantly more imitation of physical and verbal aggressive behaviour then children in the non aggressive or control conditions

  • gender of the model did influence the children’s behaviour, they were more likely to cope the behaviour of a same sex model

  • overall biys showed more aggressive behaviour than girls

8
New cards

sampling bias

  • all children from Stanford uni nursery

  • similar backgrounds so possibly can’t generalise to wider population

  • slightly small sample

9
New cards

validity

  • validity lowered due to previous mild aggressive arousal

  • high ecological as room set up with toys for children and playing is normal task for them

  • high internal as genuine behaviour shown

10
New cards

ethics

  • children can’t give their own consent, parents did for them

  • these children may be more aggressive as a result as they may learn the behaviour (socially sensitive)

11
New cards

research method

  • controlled observation

  • high level of control e.g. matching all ppts at the same base level of aggression

12
New cards

type of data

  • quantitative data - number of children that imitated behaviour, genders recorded

  • easy to analyse and compare

  • but no quantitative so lacks insight

13
New cards

reliability

  • high reliability

  • all had mild aggressive arousal before observed

  • used standardise procedures

14
New cards

practical applications

  • shows the importance of early environment on shaping behaviour

  • teaching practices (who is a child most likely to imitate)
    age ratings, films, video games

  • parenting

  • 9pm watershed in the uk

15
New cards

ethnocentrism

  • is ethnocentric

  • as research from America

  • similar socioeconomic background

  • but not really an issue as not trying to generalise any cultural influences to anywhere else