1/39
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
what are some strategies to maintain field relations?
adjust + adapt
use charm + nurture trust
perform small favors
avoid conflicts
appear interested
be the acceptable incompetent
argot
specialized language/terminology used by members of a subculture/group who interact regularly
types of field research
ethnography
ethnomethodology
phenomenological studies
grounded theory studies
ethnography
building an understanding of a culture in a setting where ppl share common culture
*utilizes: partici obsv, interviews, examine docs + cultural artifacts
THICK DESCRIPTION »» capture all details
ethnomethodology
examines way ppl construct a common sense view of the world
*unspoken rules »» cultural knowledge
example: invading personal space
grounded theory studies
uses data to create new theories
phenomenological studies
focuses on lived experiences from perspective of the individual
*describe the nature of particular phenomenon
example: studying the experience of bullying
examples of ethnographic research
studying community of isolated village/tribe
observing social dynamics of preschoolers in play school
studying online interactions on social media platform
examining cultural practices of motorcycle riders
characteristics of field research interview
unstructured
nondirective
in-depth
asking ?
listening
expressing interest
recording what was said
survey interviews (SI) vs. field research interviews (FR)
beginning + ending
SI = clear beginning + ending
FR = no clear beginning + ending
questions + question sequence
SI = same questions. same question sequence
FR = questions + question sequence differ
interviewer emotional expression
SI = interviewer always neutral
FR = interviewer shows interest
conversation structure
SI = interviewer asks questions, respondent answers
FR = friendly conversational exchange
Setting
SI = generally w/ respondent alone
FR = area varies »» can occur w/ group
formal or informal
SI = professional tone + business-like focus (ignores diversions)
FR = recorded jokes, stories, anecdotes (encourages explanation)
close or open-ended questions
SI = close-ended questions common
FR = open-ended questions common
interview pace + direction
SI = interviewer controls pace + interview direction
FR = interviewer + member control pace/direction
importance of social context
SI = social context ignored/insignificant
FR = social context important
flexibility w/ participant’s communication pattern
SI = interviewer molds comm pattern to standard framework
FR = interviewer adjusts to member’s norms + language usage
breaching experiment
purposefully violating social norms to discover implicit social rules
breaching experiment steps
break rules
elicit powerful response
rule emerged + was demonstrated
types of field notes (JDIA PIMM)
jotted notes (jog mem later)
direct observation notes (attempt include all details/specifics)
inference notes (direct observation notes that separate observations from inferences)
analytic memos (develop abstract ideas, themes, hypotheses from examining data details)
personal notes (personal diary)
interview notes (face sheet at beginning interview w/ info on date, place of observation, context, etc)
maps, diagrams, artifacts
machine-recorded data
spatial map
locates ppl + equipment in terms of physical space
social map
number/variety of ppl + interpersonal dynamics (power, influence, friendship, etc)
temporal map
ebb + flow of: ppl, goods, services, communications, schedules
key characteristics of field notes
narrative accounts of everyday lives of subjects
practices (you observe)
verbal exchanges
connections you see
important features of historical-comparative research
investigates social processes at other times and places, answers big questions
time (one time in past, across time, present)
comparison (one country, a few sets of countries, many countries)
example: comparing the development of psychological theories, comparing the psychological impact of the Great Depression in US with similar economic crises in other countries
types of comparative research
case-study comparative research (compares 1-2 cultures)
cultural-context research (compares small societies to make generalizations abt similar societies)
cross-national research (gathers several variables data for multiple nations)
transnational research (compares multinational units)
cross-national research
data for several variables across many nations + analyzes data
examples: gender earning gap in 17 nations, study of imprisonment in 14 nations
cultural-context research
compares small # societies/cultures representing theoretical types to create generalizations to other societies of same type
example: race relations in US, South Africa, Brazil; how different cultures demonstrate/view emotional expression
case-study comparative research
compare 1-2 particular cultures (or cultural regions) in depth
examples: how do US + Canada differ?, how are US + Russia education systems alike + diff?, comparative studies of teaching methods
transnational research
examines + compares multinational units
examples: Third World countries, studying disinformation in Asian countries, studying effects COVID-19 Pandemic on European countries
primary sources
data from past events created + used in past time period
examples: newspapers, letters, magazines, journals, meeting minutes, public docs, photos
secondary sources
someone else’s description/interpretation of an event (they didn’t participate in)
examples: books + documentaries abt Civil War, textbooks
combinational explanation
A, B, C appeared together in time + place Z that had conditions G, then D resulted
*several factors w/ specific conditions
primary focus of action research
actions (change)
research (understanding)
actions phase in action research DA
develop an action plan using data
assemble + document data during action phase
Data Action
plagarism
theft of another person’s ideas by using his/her exact words + the ideas w/o properly documenting the original source
examples: paraphrasing w/o citation, direct copying, misrepresenting common knowledge
in-text citation format
Direct Quote: (Author, Year, p. #)
Parenthetical: (Author, Year)
qualitative research report
intro
general aspects situation
how materials collected
setting details
report organization
the situation
analytic categories
contrast situation w/ other situations
development of situation over time
strategies
summary + implications
*field research
quantitative research report (structure)
abstract/executive summary
presentation of problem
description of methods
results + tables
discussion
conclusions
*historical-comparative study
guiding theory/framework in literature review
provides a roadmap for your research, ensuring that is focused, rigorous, and contributes meaningfully to existing body of knowledge
frame (or helps us understand) facts in the literature
establish expectations (or hypotheses) +/or research
justify speculation when no evidence to justify an idea exists in the literature
steps in field research
prepare to enter the field
choose field site + gain access to it
enter field + establish social relations w/ members (apply strategies)
maintain relations in the field
gather + record data
exit field site
action research data collecting techniques
experiencing
by observation
active
passive
enquiring
by asking
informal interview
structured formal interview
questionnaires
attitude scales
standardized tests
examining
by using records
archival docs
journals
maps
audio/video tapes
artifacts
field notes
what is the key characteristic of field research notes?
descriptive
what is recommended for the action phase in action research?
implement planned changes/interventions based on findings from previous stages
implement: carefully execute planned strategies/interventions
monitoring: continuously observe and implement the effects of the interventions
data collection: collect data to assess the impact of the changes
what are some differences between a quantitative research report and a qualitative research report such as field research or historical-comparative study?
qualitative = more flexible and narrative-driven, often including thematic analysis
focus = in-depth exploration of concepts, themes
data presentation = use direct quotations, field notes, and transcripts to illustrate findings
language = descriptive and interpretative (personal reflections and insights)
interpretation = relies on careful analysis of textual data to develop theoretical insights
what is the structure of a quantitative research report?
quantitative: follows standardized format
focus: numerical data, statistical analysis, + hypothesis testing
data presentation: uses tables, charts, + graphs
language: formal and objective, avoiding personal opinions and biases
interpretation relies on statistical analysis to draw conclusions and make generalizations
what is a distinct characteristic of historical-comparative research?
sees causality as contingent and uses combinational explanation