1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Marbury v Madison (1803)
PD 4 (Marshall Court)- established judicial review (court declares laws const)
McCulloch v Maryland (1819)
PD 4 (Marshall Court)- congress can create a national bank through the elastic clause, and is supreme law of the land
Gibbons v Ogden (1824)
PD 4 (Marshall Court + Market Revolution) - established federal control over interstate commerce
Worcester v Georgia (1832)
PD 4 (Marshall Court) - only federal govt can regulate native relations (Jackson ignores)
Commonwealth v Hunt (1842)
PD 4 (Market Rev) - labor unions are legal
Dred Scott v Sanford (1857)
PD 5 (Civil War tensions) - slaves are property, not citizens, Congress can’t prohibit slavery (Missouri Comp is unconstitutional)
Civil Rights Cases (1883)
PD 6 (post reconstruction) - segregation is constitutional
Wabash, St. Louis, & Pacific Railway Company v Illinois (1886)
PD 6 (the Grange + RR co.) - states cannot regulate interstate commerce, only Congress can
US v EC Knight Co (1895)
PD 6 (industrialization) - fed govt can’t act against trusts, only interstate commerce
Plessy v Ferguson (1896)
PD 6 (civil rights) - segregation is equal (separate but equal)
“Insular Cases” (1901)
PD 7 (imperialism from SpanAm and FiloAm War) - fed govt can tax imports from imperial colonies
Northern Securities Co. v US
PD 7 (progressive era) - govt CAN bust monopolies under Sherman Antitrust Act
Lochner v New York (1905)
PD 7 (industrialization/progressive era) - state can’t regulate working hours
Schenck v US (1919)
PD 7 (WWI) - civil liberties (free speech) are limited in times of war
Schechter Poultry Corp v US (1936)
PD 7 (New Deal) - NRA is unconstitutional, New Deal exceeds powers of fed govt
Korematsu v US (1944)
PD 7 (WWII) - Japanese internment camps is constitutional to protect national security
Brown v BOE (1954)
PD 8 (Warren Court) - segregation is not constitutional in schools
Gideon v Wainwright (1963)
PD 8 (Warren Court) - if you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed to you
Escobedo v Illinois (1964)
PD 8 (Warren Court) - the accused has the right to counsel during police interrogations
Miranda v Arizona (1966)
PD 8 (Warren Court) - caused Miranda rights
Tinker v Des Moines (1969)
PD 8 (vietnam protests) - students have the right to free speech in schools as long as it does not disrupt educational activities
Roe v Wade (1973)
PD 8 (Burger court (cons but lib)) - legal right to an abortion
US v Nixon (1974)
PD 8 (executive privilege / watergate) - limited presidential power regarding the right to withhold information
Regents of the University of California v Bakke (1978)
PD 8 (affirmative action) - affirmative action is constitutional but racial quotas are not
Bush v Gore (2000)
PD 9 (voting processes) - standardized the voting process