Trusts 4 Fiduciary Duties and Accessory Liability

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/30

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Law

Graduate

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

31 Terms

1
New cards
Trustee Duties
Comply with the terms of the trusts and exercise functions in accordance with the prescribed standards of care and skill
2
New cards
Fiduciary Duties
Not to create conflicts between personal interests and duties to beneficiaries and not to make an unauthorised profit from their role as a trustee
3
New cards
No Conflict
A fiduciary must not put themselves in a position where their personal interests conflict with their duties to their principal
4
New cards
No Profit
Fiduciary must not obtain unauthorised benefit as a result of their position as a fiduciary, either for themselves or for a third party
5
New cards
Self-Dealing (Tito v Wadell)
Involves a trustee purchasing from/ selling to the trust
6
New cards
Using a company for self-dealing
Where the trustee is the controlling mind of the company, this is still self-dealing however where the trustee is merely a shareholder it is more nuanced and depends on the control of the shareholding
7
New cards
Fair Dealing
Invovles transacting directly with a beneficiary to buy their beneficial interest under the trust
8
New cards
Consequences of Fair-Dealing
Transactions is voidable unless the trustee can show they made full disclosure to he beneficiary, acted honestly and fairly and did not take advantage of the beneficiary
9
New cards
Conflict between Principals
Fiduciaries can proceed only if they have the fully informed consent of their principals or the transaction will be voidable
10
New cards
Remedy for a Transaction where there is a conflict between principals
Will depend on whether there is a profit or loss to the principal, this may required compensation or simply ending the fiduciary relationship
11
New cards
Direct Profit
Income which has been made directly out of the principal’s property belongs to the principal
12
New cards
Brown v IRC
A solicitor who used interest gained from the principal’s bank account had to compensate the principal
13
New cards
Indirect Profit (Re Macadam)
Where a trustee is appointed as a director of a company as part of a trustee and receives remuneration, this must be paid to the trust fund
14
New cards
Re Llewellin’s Will Trusts
A trustee may retain indirect profit where stated in the trust instrument
15
New cards
Keech v Sandford
A fiduciary may not exploit any opportunities that arise from the course of their appointment, in this case leasing a property for themselves as the landlord was unwilling to lease to the minor beneficiary
16
New cards
Boardman v Phipps

1. A beneficiary can develop a fiduciary relationship by taking on the burden of the trust
2. Trustees cannot provide consent, it must be the beneficiaries
3. Failure to provide total information to the beneficiaries will void the defence of consent
17
New cards
Attorney General for Hong Kong v Reid
A fiduciary cannot accept bribes and will be stripped of them
18
New cards
FHR European Ventures v Ceder Capital Partners
Remedies for breach of no-profit rule are: account of profits and constructive trust
19
New cards
Account of Profits
A personal claim which requires the trustee to pay the principal an amount equivalent to the profit they have made
20
New cards
A Constructive Trust
Provides protection against insolvency of the fiduciary and allows the principal to trace any subsequent profits made by the fiduciary
21
New cards
Accessory Liability
A personal claim against the person who dishonestly assisted or procured the trust
22
New cards
Group Seven Ltd v Nasir
Requirements for a Dishonest Assistance Claim: Trust in existence at the material time; Trustee committed a breach of that trust; Defendant assisted the trustee to commit the breach of trust; and Defendant’s assistant was dishonest
23
New cards
Assistance
Defendant must assist the trustee/ fiduciary in connection with the breach: it is sufficient if they help to plan, commit or cover up the breach
24
New cards
Ultrafam Ltd v Fielding
Assistance must be more than minimal, it must make the commission of the breach or its concealment easier than it would otherwise have been
25
New cards
Eaves v Hickson
Assistance is sufficient if the defendant procures or instigates the breach of duty
26
New cards
Dishonesty
A person who assists a trustee or fiduciary to commit a breach of duty is only liable if they act dishonestly
27
New cards
Royal Brunei Airlines v Tan
“Acting dishonestly or the lack of probity, which is synonymous, means simply not acting as an honest person would in the circumstances”
28
New cards
Ivery v Genting Casinos
“When dishonesty is in question, the fact-finding tribunal must ascertain subjectively the actual state of the individual’s knowledge or belief as to the fact”
29
New cards
Starglade Properties Ltd v Nash
The dishonest misapplication of trust property will amount to dishonest assistance even if the defendant does not know that there is a trust in place
30
New cards
Proof for Dishonest Assistance
Claimant must show that the assistance was the real or effective cause of the profits, not just the “but for” cause
31
New cards
Novoship Ltd v Mikhaylyuk
Dishonest assistant is potential liable for profits but this depends highly on their participation in the breach