PROJECT MANAGEMENT 2

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/31

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

32 Terms

1
New cards

Strategy

  • is making a decision how the organization will compete its rivals in the industry where it is participating

  • It is vital for success of the project to be parallel with strategic goals of the organization

2
New cards

Strategy Management

  • is responding to changes in the external environment for competitive position

  • A key requisite for survival to always keep updated to external changes through continuous scan of the political-legal, economic, socio-cultural, technological, and natural (PESTN) environment of the organization

3
New cards

Project Management Maturity

is the progressive advancement of project and multi-project management proficiency in approach, methodology, strategy, and decision-making process.

4
New cards

Project Maturity Model

reflects that maturity is a continuous process of improvement via identifiable incremental steps.

5
New cards

High Maturity

Institutionalized, seeks continuous improvement

6
New cards

Moderate Maturity

Defined practices, training programs organizational support

7
New cards

Low Maturity

Ad hoc process, no common language, little support

8
New cards

Project Selection

  • the process of appraising a project or groups of projects and afterward deciding to execute some of them in order to realize the objectives of the organization.

  • It appraises each project proposal and decides on the premier priority project/s for more analysis

  • Follows a four-stage process namely identification of project/s, evaluation and prioritizing project/s selection and initiation of project/s and review of projects.

9
New cards

1 Identify projects that support the strategy

2 Evaluate and prioritize projects

3 Select and initiate projects

4 Review projects regularly

4 GENERIC PROCESS OF PROJECT SELECTION

10
New cards

FIRST STEP

Calls for the naming of the project concepts or ideas with a written brief description of a project

11
New cards

SECOND STEP

Each project is evaluated using different criteria and models and the outcomes become the basis of prioritization

12
New cards

THIRD STEP

Selection and initiation that logically follows evaluation and prioritization focusing mainly on the delicate decision of staffing the project teams

13
New cards

FOURTH STEP

A regular review of project/s which is imperative to find out if they are still in-line with the strategy of the firm

14
New cards

model

  • offers an abstraction of a more intricate reality \

  • • A fractional version of the certainty it intended to replicate and cannot produce an optimal decision

15
New cards

NONNUMERIC

Do not utilize numbers as inputs; older and simpler

16
New cards

NUMERIC

Make use of numbers to measure both objective and subjective criteria

17
New cards

Sacred Cow

A project recommended by a senior and influential official in the organization. "Sacred" in a sense that it will be maintained until the boss personally, identifies the idea as a failure and terminates it

18
New cards

Operating Necessity

A project is obligatory to keep the system operating; does not necessitate a great extent of formal evaluation

19
New cards

Competitive Necessity

A project which is founded on a desire to preserve the company's competitive position in the market 4. Product Line Extension A project to develop and distribute

20
New cards

Product Line Extension

A project to develop and distribute new products evaluated in the level to which it fits the firm's present product line, fill a gap, strengthens a weak link, or extends the line in a fresh, advantageous direction

21
New cards

Comparative Benefit Model

Often used to select from a list of projects that are complex, difficult to assess and often non comparable. The one with the most benefit to firm is selected.

22
New cards

. Sacred Cow\

Operating Necessity

Competitive Necessity

Product Line Extension

Comparative Benefit Model

5 NONNUMERIC MODELS

23
New cards

REALISM

The model should mirror the reality of manager’s decision situation together with the various objectives of both the firm and its managers

24
New cards

EASE OF USE

The model should be realistically convenient, not require to carry out, and be simple to employ and comprehend

25
New cards

CAPABILITY

The model should be complicated enough to deal with numerous time periods, simulate different situations both inside and external to the project and optimize the decision

26
New cards

COST

The data gathering and modelling costs should be low in relation to the cost of the project and must certainly be less than the probable benefits of the project.

27
New cards

FLEXIBILITY

The model should offer convincing outcomes among the conditions that the firm may experience

28
New cards

EASY COMPUTERIZATION

The model should be simple and suitable to collect and accumulate the information in a computer database, and to maneuver data in the model by using a commonly accessible, standard computer package programs

29
New cards

Payback Period

Measures the time it will take to recover the project investment Formula:

A shorter payback period, the better

<p>Measures the time it will take to recover the project investment Formula: </p><p></p><p>A shorter payback period, the better</p>
30
New cards

Payback Period Interpretation

A shorter payback period, the better

31
New cards

. Internal rate of Return interpretation

The discount rate which equates the present value of the future cash flows of an investment with the initial investment. It is the discount rate at which the net present value of an investment becomes zero.

32
New cards

Internal rate of Return

A project should only be accepted if its IRR is NOT less than the target internal rate of return. When comparing two or more mutually exclusive projects, the project having highest value of IRR should be accepted.

<p>A project should only be accepted i<strong>f its IRR is NOT less than the target internal rate of return.</strong> When comparing two or more mutually exclusive projects, the project having highest value of IRR should be accepted.</p>