Court Cases

studied byStudied by 1 person
0.0(0)
Get a hint
Hint

Mapp v. Ohio

1 / 11

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

12 Terms

1

Mapp v. Ohio

Exclusionary rule is applied; illegally obtained evidence and evidence related to it can be excluded from trial

Dollree Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene materials after an admittedly illegal police search of her home for a fugitive. She appealed her conviction on the basis of freedom of expression.

New cards
2

Gideon v. Wainright

Defendants have a right to a lawyer for any case regardless of the charge.

Gideon was charged in Florida state court with felony breaking and entering. When he appeared in court without a lawyer, Gideon requested that the court appoint one for him. According to Florida state law, however, an attorney may only be appointed to an indigent defendant in capital cases, so the trial court did not appoint one. Gideon represented himself in trial. He was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison. Gideon filed a habeas corpus petition in the Florida Supreme Court, arguing that the trial court's decision violated his constitutional right to be represented by counsel. The Florida Supreme Court denied habeas corpus relief.

New cards
3

Escobedo v. Illinois

Defendants have a right to counsel during police questioning

Danny Escobedo was arrested and taken to a police station for questioning. Over several hours, the police refused his repeated requests to see his lawyer. Escobedo subsequently confessed to murder. Escobedo appealed the affirmation of his conviction of murder by the Supreme Court of Illinois, which held that petitioner's confession had been admissible even though it was obtained after he had requested and been denied the assistance of counsel.

New cards
4

Miranda v. Arizona

The accused have the right to know their constitutional rights

On March 13, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested in his house and brought to the police station where he was questioned by police officers in connection with a kidnapping and rape. After two hours of interrogation, the police obtained a written confession from Miranda. The written confession was admitted into evidence at trial despite the objection of the defense attorney and the fact that the police officers admitted that they had not advised Miranda of his right to have an attorney present during the interrogation. The jury found Miranda guilty. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed and held that Miranda’s constitutional rights were not violated because he did not specifically request counsel.

New cards
5

Terry v. Ohio

“stop and frisk” decision

Under the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, a police officer may stop a suspect on the street and frisk him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous."

New cards
6

Baker v. Carr

Congressional legislative districts (federal and state) must be roughly equal in population“ - One man, One vote”-fair representation

Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state's General Assembly was virtually ignored. Baker's suit detailed how Tennessee's reapportionment efforts ignored significant economic growth and population shifts within the state.

New cards
7

Engel v. Vitale

State led prayer in public schools is unconstitutional. Violation of the establishment clause

The New York State Board of Regents authorized a short, voluntary prayer for recitation at the start of each school day. A group of organizations joined forces in challenging the prayer, claiming that it violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The New York Court of Appeals rejected their arguments.

New cards
8

Abington v. Schempp

Banned the reading of Bible verses in public schools (can be educational). Violation of establishment clause

Under Pennsylvania law, public schools were required to read from the bible at the opening of each school day. The school district sought to enjoin enforcement of the statute. The district court ruled that the statute violated the First Amendment, even after the statute had been amended to permit a student to excuse himself. 

New cards
9

Griswold v. Connecticut

Privacy is a constitutional right for the first time. Based on interpretation of several amendments

In 1879, Connecticut passed a law that banned the use of any drug, medical device, or other instrument in furthering contraception. A gynecologist at the Yale School of Medicine, C. Lee Buxton, opened a birth control clinic in New Haven in conjunction with Estelle Griswold, who was the head of Planned Parenthood in Connecticut. They were arrested and convicted of violating the law, and their convictions were affirmed by higher state courts. Their plan was to use the clinic to challenge the constitutionality of the statute under the Fourteenth Amendment before the Supreme Court. 

New cards
10

Tinker v. Des Moines

Ban on Black Armbands. Students First Amendment Rights established. 7-2 decision. “In our system, state-operated schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students.”

New cards
11

Roe v. Wade

In 1970, Jane Roe (a fictional name used in court documents to protect the plaintiff’s identity) filed a lawsuit against Henry Wade, the district attorney of Dallas County, Texas, where she resided, challenging a Texas law making abortion illegal except by a doctor’s orders to save a woman’s life. In her lawsuit, Roe alleged that the state laws were unconstitutionally vague and abridged her right of personal privacy, protected by the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments.

New cards
12

Bakke v. University of California

Allan Bakke, a thirty-five-year-old white man, had twice applied for admission to the University of California Medical School at Davis. He was rejected both times. The school reserved sixteen places in each entering class of one hundred for "qualified" minorities, as part of the university's affirmative action program, in an effort to redress longstanding, unfair minority exclusions from the medical profession. Bakke's qualifications (college GPA and test scores) exceeded those of any of the minority students admitted in the two years Bakke's applications were rejected. Bakke contended, first in the California courts, then in the Supreme Court, that he was excluded from admission solely on the basis of race.

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 1193 people
... ago
4.9(15)
note Note
studied byStudied by 111 people
... ago
5.0(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 57 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 251 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 13 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 19 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 12 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 5775 people
... ago
4.8(27)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (22)
studied byStudied by 2 people
... ago
4.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (32)
studied byStudied by 4 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (29)
studied byStudied by 8 people
... ago
5.0(3)
flashcards Flashcard (31)
studied byStudied by 46 people
... ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (68)
studied byStudied by 10 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (52)
studied byStudied by 5 people
... ago
4.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (41)
studied byStudied by 2 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (103)
studied byStudied by 8 people
... ago
5.0(1)
robot