1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
CR39 pros
High optical quality (low dispersion)
More scratch resistant than polycarb
Least expensive
CR39 cons
Less impact resistant than polycarb and trivex
Thicker lenses (lower n)
A lower refractive index will result in…
Steeper curvature → Thicker lens
Polycarbonate pros
High impact resistant
Thin lenses
Built in UV protection
Polycarbonate cons
Lowest optical quality (more dispersion)
More expensive than CR39
Must be anti-scratch and AR coated
Trivex pros
High impact resistance
Thinner lenses
Better optical quality than polycarb
Trivex cons
More expensive than polycarb
Lower optical quality than CR39
High index pros
Thinner lenses
High index cons
Most expensive
Lower optical quality than CR39
Rank types of lenses from least expensive to most
CR39 → Polycarb → Trivex → HI 1.67 → Crown glass → HI 1.74
If someone is a polycarb non-adapter, what type of lens should you recommend?
Trivex
If price is a bigger issue → CR39
Rank types of lenses from worse optical quality to best
Polycarb → High index → Trivex → CR39 → Crown glass
What type of lenses should be recommended to children?
Polycarb and trivex for their impact resistance
Rank types of plastic lenses from thickest to thinnest
CR39 → Trivex → Polycarb → HI
Ways that trivex and polycarb are similar
Impact resistance
Scratch easier
UV absorption
Ways that polycarb and trivex are different
Trivex is more expensive
Trivex has better optical quality
Polycarb has higher n