Dement and Kleitman AS Level

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/12

flashcard set

Earn XP

Last updated 1:51 PM on 4/27/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

13 Terms

1
New cards

What are the 3 aims of the study?

  1. Does dream recall differ between rapid eye movement

(REM) and quiescent (nREM) stages of sleep?

  1. Is there a positive correlation between subjective

estimates of dream duration and the length of the REM period before waking?

  1. Are eye-movement patterns related to dream content?

2
New cards

What is the IV for aim 1

the type of sleep stage the participants were awakened from (Rem or nRem)

3
New cards

What is the IV for aim 2

waking participants after either 5 or 15 minutes of REM sleep

4
New cards

What is the IV for aim 3

the direction of eye movement patterns

5
New cards

What is the DV for aim 1

whether the participants reported a dream upon waking and, if so, the specific details of that dream

6
New cards

What was the DV for aim 2

the participant's subjective estimation of whether they had been in REM sleep for 5 or 15 minutes

7
New cards

What is the DV for aim 3

the participant's report of dream content

8
New cards

What type of experiment was the study?

laboratory experiment

9
New cards

What type of experimental design was the study?

repeated measure design

10
New cards

How many people were selected?

9 (7 male 2 female)

11
New cards

How many were mainly studied

5

12
New cards

What were the strengths of the study

a highly standardized, laboratory-based procedure (e.g., controlling caffeine/alcohol intake and using EEG technology), which ensured reliability, allowed for replication, and established a clear, causal relationship between REM sleep and dreaming

13
New cards

What were the weaknesses of the study?

a small sample size (9 participants), low ecological validity due to an unnatural laboratory setting, and reliance on subjective, potentially inaccurate, self-reported dream content