1/4
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
early models of memory were thought to be limited because
Memory capacity was shown to vary- depending on context, e.g. isolated words vs words in a sentence
How information is encoded should depend on the type of information to be remembered
The duration of memory traces depends on duration of presentation, interference, modality and pre-existing knowledge
Simply being exposed to information repeatedly does not guarantee that it will be remembered
Shallow Processing includes
Structural: appearance or physical qualities, e.g. is the word written in capitals
Phonemic: encoding the sounds of a stimuli, e.g. does it rhyme with course
Deep Processing includes
Semantic: encoding the meaning, e.g. does It fit in the sentence
Elaboration: analysis that links information to images associations, organisations and connection to prior knowledge
Craik and Tulving (1975)
briefly presented common words (<200ms) to participants after priming them with one of three questions
Is the words in capital letters? (structural)
Does the word rhyme with weight? (phonemic)
Does the word fit in the sentence; he met a ___ in the street? (semantic)
They measured response times and accuracy of recognition (on a sheet of 60 target and 120 distractor words)
what did the results lead to?
Deeper levels of processing led to longer response times and more accurate recognition, i.e. a more elaborate memory trace