1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Atomic radii decreases across period 3. Explain why.
Number of protons increases, increasing nuclear charge
Number of electrons increases but they are all added to the Valence electron shell. Shielding effect remains relatively constant
Effective nuclear charge increases, causing stronger electrostatic forces of attraction between nucleus and Valence electrons
Hence Valence electrons are closer to the nucleus, causing atomic radii to decrease
Describe and explain the trend of ionic radius across period 3 elements.
Anions are larger than cations
All of these anions have 10 electrons
Number of occupied electron shells remain the same
Shielding effect remains constant
As charge increases, the electrostatic forces of attraction between the nucleus and the Valence electrons increase
Hence Ionic radius of anions decreases
There is a large increase in ionic radius from Si4+ to P3-
P3- has an additional occupied electron shell
Shielding effect is greater in P3- than Si4+
Electrostatic forces of attraction between nucleus and Valence electron is lower in P3- than in Si4+
Cations are larger
Describe and explain the trend of the 1st ionisation energy across period 3 elements.
1st I.E. generally increases across period 3
As the number of protons increases, the nuclear charge increases
However, the number of quantum shells remain the same so shielding effect remains constant
Effective nuclear charge increases
Leads to stronger electrostatic forces of attraction between nucleus and Valence electrons
1st I.E. decreases from Mg to Al.
Valence electron in Al is in the higher energy 3p subshell
Valence electron in Mg is in the lower energy 3s subshell
Less energy needed to remove one Valence electron from Al than from Mg.
1st I.E. decreases from P to S
Inter electron repulsion present in the 3p sushell in S
Less energy needed to remove a Valence electron from S than from Mg
Describe and explain trend of electronegativity across period 3
Electronegativity increases across period 3
As number of protons increases, nuclear charge increases
Number of quantum shells remain constant so shielding effect is constant
Effective nuclear charge increases
Stronger electrostatic forces of attraction between Valence electrons and nucleus
Describe and explain the trend of melting points of oxides across period 3.
Na2O, MgO and Al2O3 all have giant ionic lattice structures.
There are strong electrostatic forces of attraction between the oppositely charged ions.
Large amounts of energy is needed to overcome the electrostatic forces between the ions
Melting point of MgO is higher than Na2O
Mg2+ cation has higher ionic charge and smaller atomic radius than Na+ cation
Mg2+ has greater charge density than Na+
Stronger electrostatic forces of attraction between oppositely charged ions in MgO compared to Na2O
More energy needed to overcome stronger ionic bonding in MgO than in Na2O
Melting point of Al2O3 is lower than MgO
Al3+ cation has the highest charge density and is able to polarised O2-
This gives Al2O3 some covalent character which weakens Ionic bond strength
Describe and explain the trend of melting points of oxides across period 3.
NaCl and MgCl2 have giant ionic lattice structure with strong electrostatic forces of attraction between oppositely charged ions
Large amount of energy required to overcome the electrostatic forces of attraction
Mg2+ has a relatively high charge density compared to Na+
Mg2+ polarises the electron cloud of the Cl- anion
There is a partial covalent character within the ionic bonding
AlCl3 has a simple molecular structure with weak intermolecular id id forces of attraction
Little energy required to overcome the id id forces of attraction
The Al3+ ion has the highest charge density of all metal captions
Al3+ ions have the greatest polarising power so it is able to polarise the Cl- anion to the greatest extent
Al-Cl bond is covalent so the compound is a simple molecular structure
Hence AlCl3 has a low melting point
SiCl4 and PCl5 both have simple molecular structures with weak intermolecular id id forces of attraction
Little energy required to overcome id id forces of attraction
Hence SiCl4 and PCl5 both have low melting points
Size of electron cloud in SiCl4 is less than in PCl5
Extent of intermolecular id id forces of attraction is lower in SiCl4 than in PCl5
Less energy needed to overcome id id forces of attraction in SiCl4 than in PCl5
Hence SiCl4 has a lower melting point than PCl5