1/10
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Ancient DNA sequencing (1980)
1984- 150-year-old museum quagga, sequenced from dried muscle 229 from dried muscle
1985- s400 year old mummy
Amplified and cloned multiple DNA fragments
Antediluvian DNA
Plant and animal remains inside amber, ancient fossils
Many of the studies are not replicable
DNA is likely to be from contamination
Ancient DNA sequencing- hype (1990s)
Reports of the sequencing of very old DNAs
Many of the studies are not replicable
The DNA is likely to be from contamination
Damaged DNA
DNA decay after cell death
Hydrolysis (break DNA strand > short fragment)
Alkylation (DNA crosslinks> prevent amplification)
Oxidation and hydrolysis (DNA mutation> C to U deamination is a main source of sequencing errors)
The older the DNA, the lower the quality
DNA preservation
Theoretical DNA preservation - 1 million years
Best preservation condition: permafrost
Contamination
Environmental DNA: bacteria /plant
Excess non-sample DNA
Reduce sequence throughput
Modern DNA is less damaged and amplified better than ancient DNA
Reduce sequence throughput
Wrong information
Solutions to contamination
Extract DNA from bone
Clean lab
Bioinformatic solution
New methods for library construction
Linker ligation enrich fragmented single strand DNA
Human RNA probes to capture hominoid DNA
Questions that can be addressed about other homo species
time for separation, demographic history of archaic homo species, gene flow between modern/archaic homo species
Admixture appears to be quite common in human history
Both archaic genomes had gene flow into modern humans, also evidence of archaic gene flow into africans. some of the introgeression has functional implications
Adaptive archaic introversion
Archaic and modern human admixed. advantageous alleles in archaic genomes retained in modern human