1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Evidence Based Practice (The categories described by Graham et al 2006)
knowledge use —> use of the evidence underpinning the practice EXAMPLE behaviour change
impact —> what results improved from the knowledge EXAMPLE service user/patient outcomes, cost effective delivery of care
Practice has been changed when
Evidence of harm has been presented
The hidden consequences of routine epistiotomy
discomfort, sexual and psychological health, relationships with her infant,families and friends ← these outcomes were rarely considered
Evidence that EBM is implemented
Episiotomy rates in the UK are around 14%
Things that were/weren’t considered in reducing episiotomy
Considered: Reducing routine episiotomy as a consequence of evidence of harm was considered and necessary
Not Considered: Whether there was an optimal rate of epistiotomy
Impacts of change of epistiotomy practice in midwifery management of the perinium
What should be considered in the scenario of reducing routine epistiotomy? (outcome wise think if it was implented)
Potential consequences of reversing the practice
current research to address midwifery skills in perineal assesment has highlighted a lack of confidence amongst midwifes of when and how to perform an epistiotomy
A potential outcome is a women who could have benefitted from an epistiotomy could sustain more severe perineal trauma as their midwife may have not felt sufficiently informed to make a decision and intervnee