1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
how did the power of the kings increases in Norman England : rebellions + Norman response
resistance from Anglo Saxons , William employed brutal measure
He could order extreme punishments for rebellion + punish large groups who weren’t directly involved e.g destroyed farmlands and killed animals
how did the power of the kings increases in Norman England : Norman castles
built all over England
Norman lords lived there and controlled local people under Norman law
Castles designed to look intimidating + keep watch of local people
Show increasing royal authority over law
how did the power of the kings increases in Norman England : Feudal system
everyone owed money/ service to those above them except from king as he was at top
Norman nobles replaces Anglo Saxon nobles
Anglo Saxon serfs were bound to work for their laws and could not leave without permission
how did the power of the kings increases in Norman England : Outlaws and the forests
men over 14 who ran away from punishment were called outlaws, women called waived
They lost protection from law so could be killed with no legal consequences
Strong connections to forest, e.g Robin Hood who first appeared written in late 14th century
Many real outlaw gangs lived in forests and commited crimes
how did the power of the kings increases in Norman England : Forest laws
meant that previous common land was now owned by king , became illegal for peasants to be on it / use it
Introduced crime of poaching
Led to bitterness as took away fundamental freedoms, created ‘social law’ as people though it was ok to break
Had very severe punishment of both cpatital and corporal
how did the power of the kings increases in Norman England : Murdrum
if a Norman was murderd by Anglo Saxons and the killer was not found then the community had to pay a fine to the king
Suppose to stop an increase in revenge murders after Anglo Saxon invasion
Helped protect the authority
Crimes against the person : Anglo Saxon v Norman v later Middle Ages?
Anglo Saxon
murder
Assault
Public disorder
Norman
murder
Assault
Public disorder
Slander (false statement about someone in public )
later Middle Ages
murder
Assault
Public disorder
Slander
Crimes against property: Anglo Saxon v Norman v later Middle Ages
Anglo Saxon
theft
Counterfeiting coins
Arson
Norma
theft
Arson
later Middle Ages
theft
Arson
Crimes against authority: Anglo Saxon v Norman v crimes against authority
Anglo Saxon
treason
Betraying your lord
Norman
treason
Poaching on kings land
Leaving home (surfs couldn’t leave village without lords permission )
later Middle Ages
heresy
Stautete of labourers
Treason
Poaching
When was the Statut of Labourers passed?
1351
What was the statute of labourers?
Set maximum wage for workers
Crime to ask for more money
Crime to move areas in order to look for better paid work
Result of the Black Death in 1348
Heresy laws?
Passed due to an increase in so called heretics and people who wanted the church to be reformed, clergy felt undermined and threatened
Heretics were punished by sever punishment such as burning at the stake
In 1414 Justices of the Peace were given the power to arrest suspected heretics and expected to take them to church courts for trial
When were the laws against heresy passed?
1382
1401
1414
How was the tithing used as law enforcement?
group of 10 people and everyone was a member
If one member broke the law the others had to take responsibility for getting them accused in court
If they failed they would all face punishment
How was the hue and cry used as law enforcement?
anyone who was wronged could call upon everyone else in community to chase criminal simply by calling on them
If the community didn’t respond thye were in the wrong
How was the posse comitatus used as law enforcement?
brought in by the Norman’s
Could be raised by kings county official, sherif to chase a criminal
Anyone called to join had to
It worked when everyone lived in small stable communities
How was the trail by oath used to determine guilt / innocence?
shire courts - sherif or local clergy would judge people on being guilty or not
Accused would swear an oath of guilt it innocence
Members of community would swear oaths about accused honesty
If this could not determine guilt - trail by ordeal would be used
How was the trail by ordeal used to determine guilt / innocence?
conducted by church - idea that gods would help you if you were innocent
Law enforcement not punishment
Trial by fire - accused hold hot iron , if your hand was healing after 3 days you were innocent
Trial by water - bound and put into holy body of water , if you sunk your were innocent
How was the trail by combat used to determine guilt / innocence?
Norman idea
Accused and accuser would fight , if you lost you were guilty
How did law enforcement change from c1000-c1500 (Anglo Saxon , Norman, later Middle Ages / medieval)
Anglo Saxon
tithings
Hue and cry
Trial by oath
Trial by ordeal
Norman
tithings
Hue and cry
Posse comitatus
Trial by oath
Trial by ordeal
Trial by combat
later Middle Ages:
manor courts
Hue and cry
Coroner
Justice of the peace
Trial by oath
Trial by combat
Posse comitatus
Constables
Justices in Eyre
Assize of Clarendon ?
1166 passed by King Henry II
Reorganised courts and set up prison for those who were accused and waiting for trial
Justices in Eyre
ordered by king Henry II
Royal judges
Visited each country 2 times a year to hear most serious criminal cases
Standard written instructions given to local sheriffs
How did King Henry II changed C + P?
increased power of governments and king in enforcing c + p
Slightly less of a role played by local community in C +P
What changed in law enforcement in later Middle Ages?
more centralised approach - crime dealt with by government officials , similar approaches all across country
Towns divided into wards
In 1194 King Richard introduced coroners to deal with suspicious deaths
1195 Richard brought in knights to protect the kings peace
In 1327 king Edward III brought them into all areas and by 1361 they were called justices of the peace , appointed by the king and imposed central government power base
Tithingmen became constables
Justices of the peace in later medieval?
selected based on wealth and status played an important role in local government + law enforcement
Met 4 times a year to carry out magistrate duties + order
What stayed the same in law enforcement during later medieval England
townspeople still expected to play their role in apprehending offernders , towns divided into wards for that purpose
Less serious crimes till dealt with by Anglo saxon methods such as manor courts for disputes between lord of the manor and tenants
System of hue and cry still in place
Punishment in Anglo Saxon England
wergild - fine paid to murder victims family by murdere amount depends on status of victim, retribution
Capitol punishment - treason + arson, killed by hanging , deterrent + retribution
Corporal punishment - for lesser crimes punished by mutilation e.g. eye gouging , losing hand and feet detterant and retribution
Stocks and pillory - used pain and humiliation , pillory = secured neck and arms, stocks = tied ankles, placed in town centre for everyone to see - detterant
Punishment in the Norman
continuity - kings Mund (kings peace ) ideas that the king should provide peace for all in country
Change - wergild scrapped , fine now goes to king, shows increasing power of crown over C + P
Change - murdrum - new collective fine for when a Norman is killed everyone in the hundred pays a fine, show power of normals , discourage rebellion
Increase in harsh punishment - capitol and corporal - due to rebellion and kings increasing power
Punishment in later Middle Ages ?
change - for high treason punished with hanged, drawn and quartered
Limbs severed and transported to different areas of the country
Act as detterant
How did punishment change from c1000 - c1500 (Anglo Saxon , Norman , later Middle Ages)
Anglo Saxon
fines (wergild)
Property confiscated
Physical punishment
Maiming
Execution by hanging or burning
Norman
- fines (murdrum)
- Stocks
- Pillories
- Physical punishment
- Mining
- Increase of the execution usually by hanging
later Middle Ages
fines
Stocks
Pillories
Physical punishment
Maiming
Execution usually by hanging
Hanging drawing and quartered introduced
What was sanctuary?
criminals could go to the clergy and ask for help, the clergy then reported the crime and the accused person was given a chance to swear an oath to leave the country in 40 days instead of going to trial
Anyone who didn’t leave in 40 days would be outlawed
Continued through the medieval period only stopped under king Henry VIII
What were church courts?
In the 11th century William I encouraged the church to set up their own courts for moral crimes
Worked on idea that criminals should have an opportunity to reform and save their souls
Church believed punishment by retribution was wrong so used more lenient punishment like ‘maiming’ rather than execution as this didn’t give the criminal a chance to think about their actions or seek forgiveness
Mostly only for the clergy
What was benefit of the clergy?
king henry II believed the clergy should not have benefit of the church courts
Only clergy could be tried in church courts
They rarely used the death penalty and punishment was much less severe
Anyone could claim to be part of the clergy so they asked them to read Psalm 51 in the bible to profit it as it was mostly only the clergy who could read
However criminals just memorised the Psalm 51 and then would recite it so it was quite open to abuse from criminals looking for lighter punishment
When did trial by oath end?
in 1215
The pope and church decided to stop it and it was replaced by trial by jury