foundational documents

studied byStudied by 36 people
5.0(1)
Get a hint
Hint

1st amendment

1 / 48

flashcard set

Earn XP

49 Terms

1

1st amendment

freedom of religion (free exercise & establishment clause), freedom of speech, freedom press, peaceful assembly, freedom to petition the govt.

New cards
2

2nd amendment

right to bear arms

New cards
3

3rd amendment

no quartering of soldiers

New cards
4

4th amendment

no unreasonable searches or seizures, exclusionary rule

New cards
5

5th amendment

right to grand jury, no double jeopardy, justly compensate, no self incrimination

New cards
6

6th amendment

right to speedy trial, writ of habeas corpus, right to face witness

New cards
7

7th amendment

US common law, statutory law, appeal on facts and facts alone

New cards
8

8th amendment

no excessive bail

New cards
9

9th amendment

reserved powers, people limit the government

New cards
10

10th amendment

reserved powers, states limit the federal government

New cards
11

11th amendment

federal courts hold the power in cases where someone sues someone from a different state

New cards
12

12th amendment

allows president to run w/ chosen VP

New cards
13

13th amendment

abolishes slavery except punishment in prison

New cards
14

14th amendment

federal laws passed require states to follow that law

New cards
15

15th amendment

citizens cannot be denied the right to vote because of race

New cards
16

16th amendment

progressive income tax

New cards
17

17th amendment

direct election of senators

New cards
18

18th amendment

prohibition

New cards
19

19th amendment

women's suffrage

New cards
20

20th amendment

lame duck

New cards
21

21st amendment

abolishes prohibition

New cards
22

22nd amendment

2 terms for president

New cards
23

23rd amendment

gave D.C. 3 electoral votes

New cards
24

24th amendment

eliminates poll tax & literacy test

New cards
25

25th amendment

Presidential Succession

New cards
26

26th amendment

18 to vote

New cards
27

27th amendment

congress cannot vote itself pay raises

New cards
28

McCulloch v. Marlyand (1819)

-federalism

-Necessary and Proper Clause decided that the Second Bank of the United States could not be taxed by the state of Maryland because Maryland could not tax instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers

<p>-federalism</p><p>-Necessary and Proper Clause decided that the Second Bank of the United States could not be taxed by the state of Maryland because Maryland could not tax instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers</p>
New cards
29

US v. Lopez (1995)

-federalism

-A case in which the Court found the 1990 Gun-Free School Zones Act unconstitutional for overstepping the congressional boundaries of the Commerce Clause and is not an economic activity

<p>-federalism</p><p>-A case in which the Court found the 1990 Gun-Free School Zones Act unconstitutional for overstepping the congressional boundaries of the Commerce Clause and is not an economic activity</p>
New cards
30

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

-freedom of religion

-School sponsored prayers in public schools violated the first amendment rig

<p>-freedom of religion</p><p>-School sponsored prayers in public schools violated the first amendment rig</p>
New cards
31

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

-freedom of religion

-The Court held that individual's interests in the free exercise of religion under the First Amendment outweighed the State's interests in compelling school attendance beyond the eighth grad

<p>-freedom of religion</p><p>-The Court held that individual&apos;s interests in the free exercise of religion under the First Amendment outweighed the State&apos;s interests in compelling school attendance beyond the eighth grad</p>
New cards
32

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

-Freedom of speech

-First Amendment right includes that school-wide discipline can not go against freedom of speech through prote

<p>-Freedom of speech</p><p>-First Amendment right includes that school-wide discipline can not go against freedom of speech through prote</p>
New cards
33

Schenck v. US (1919)

-freedom of speech

-Schenck was charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act of 1917 by attempting to cause insubordination in the military and to obstruct recruitme

<p>-freedom of speech</p><p>-Schenck was charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act of 1917 by attempting to cause insubordination in the military and to obstruct recruitme</p>
New cards
34

NY Times v. US (1971)

-freedom of the press

-The First Amendment overrides the federal government’s interest in keeping certain documents, such as the Pentagon Papers, classified

<p>-freedom of the press</p><p>-The First Amendment overrides the federal government’s interest in keeping certain documents, such as the Pentagon Papers, classified</p>
New cards
35

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

-Rights of the accused

-the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires U.S. states to provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable to afford their own

<p>-Rights of the accused</p><p>-the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires U.S. states to provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable to afford their own</p>
New cards
36

Roe v. Wade (1973)

-

-The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment dictates the fundamental “right to privacy” that protects a pregnant woman’s choice of whether to have an abortion

<p>-</p><p>-The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment dictates the fundamental “right to privacy” that protects a pregnant woman’s choice of whether to have an abortion</p>
New cards
37

Morse v. Frederick (2007)

-freedom of speech

-Schools can censor students free speech if it promotes drug us

<p>-freedom of speech</p><p>-Schools can censor students free speech if it promotes drug us</p>
New cards
38

DC. v. Heller (2008)

-right to bear arms

-Second amendment found a District of Columbia law strictly regulating gun ownership to be unconstitutional.

<p>-right to bear arms</p><p>-Second amendment found a District of Columbia law strictly regulating gun ownership to be unconstitutional.</p>
New cards
39

McDonald v. Chicago (2010)

-right to bear arms

-A case in which the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment makes the Second Amendment's right to bear arms for the purpose of self-defense applicable to the states

<p>-right to bear arms</p><p>-A case in which the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment makes the Second Amendment&apos;s right to bear arms for the purpose of self-defense applicable to the states</p>
New cards
40

Brown v. Board of Ed. (1954)

-equal protection

-Lower courts deemed that blacks and whites could be separated as long as their own facilities were equal, but the Supreme Court overruled, stating that it was unequal to separate them under the 14th Amendment. Thus, leading to the banning of segregated schools as the education of African American children suffered

<p>-equal protection</p><p>-Lower courts deemed that blacks and whites could be separated as long as their own facilities were equal, but the Supreme Court overruled, stating that it was unequal to separate them under the 14th Amendment. Thus, leading to the banning of segregated schools as the education of African American children suffered</p>
New cards
41

Citizens United v. FEC (2010)

-campaign contributions

-Companies are recognized as people and can use money as free speech

<p>-campaign contributions</p><p>-Companies are recognized as people and can use money as free speech</p>
New cards
42

Baker v. Carr (1962)

-voting rights

-The 14th amendment protects if a district wants to challenge electoral boundaries redistricting may happen

<p>-voting rights</p><p>-The 14th amendment protects if a district wants to challenge electoral boundaries redistricting may happen</p>
New cards
43

Shaw v. Reno (1993)

-voting rights

-The 14th amendment right made gerrymandering, bizarrely shaped districting, unlawful on the basis of race

<p>-voting rights</p><p>-The 14th amendment right made gerrymandering, bizarrely shaped districting, unlawful on the basis of race</p>
New cards
44

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

-Judicial review

-The Court ruled that the relevant provision within the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional, noting that issuing writs of the mandate was outside of the “original jurisdiction” of the Supreme Court as established in Article III of the constitution.

(simple - Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review in the United States, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws and statutes that they find to violate the Constitution of the United States.)

<p>-Judicial review</p><p>-The Court ruled that the relevant provision within the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional, noting that issuing writs of the mandate was outside of the “original jurisdiction” of the Supreme Court as established in Article III of the constitution.</p><p>(simple - Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review in the United States, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws and statutes that they find to violate the Constitution of the United States.)</p>
New cards
45

federalist 10

the great number of factions and diversity that would avoid tyranny. Groups would be forced to negotiate and compromise among themselves, arriving at solutions that would respect the rights of minorities. Further, he argued that the large size of the country would actually make it more difficult for factions to gain control over others.

New cards
46

Brutus 1

1. Brutus believes that Congress will get to make any laws that they want and that the laws will be to benefit the leaders
2. The states will no longer be a confederation but a republic with rules/ laws that everyone must follow
3. The Supremacy Clause states that the federal laws have power over the state laws, so the state government could be disregarded by the federal government

New cards
47

federalist 51

  • give each department a will of its own.

  • the members of each should have as little agency as possible in the appointment of the members of the others.

  • each department should be as little dependent on the other as possible.

  • each department should be able to resist the encroachments of the others.

checks and balences

New cards
48

federalist 70

executive department

New cards
49

federalist 78

proposed structure of federal courts, their powers and jurisdiction, the method of appointing judges, and related matters.

emphasized the importance of an independent judiciary and the power of judicial review.

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 7 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 147 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 18 people
Updated ... ago
4.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 6 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 3 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 165 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(4)
note Note
studied byStudied by 7 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 4176 people
Updated ... ago
4.7 Stars(33)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard52 terms
studied byStudied by 10 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard151 terms
studied byStudied by 202 people
Updated ... ago
4.0 Stars(2)
flashcards Flashcard88 terms
studied byStudied by 1 person
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard40 terms
studied byStudied by 32 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard86 terms
studied byStudied by 6 people
Updated ... ago
4.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard42 terms
studied byStudied by 8 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(1)
flashcards Flashcard50 terms
studied byStudied by 17 people
Updated ... ago
4.5 Stars(2)
flashcards Flashcard57 terms
studied byStudied by 62 people
Updated ... ago
5.0 Stars(3)