Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
4 primary models of market structure
perfect competition: many firms, identical product
monopoly: one firm, single and undifferentiated product
oligopoly: few firms, products can be identical or differentiated
monopolistic competition: many firms, differentiated products
the system of market structure is based on what 2 dimensions?
number of firms (one, few, many)
whether the goods offered are identical or differentiated
differentiated goods
different, but considered somewhat substitutable by consumers
if a firm in a perfectly competitive market changed their output, what would happen to the market price?
it would be unaffected; there’s so many firms that each of them is too small within the scope of the market to make a significant difference
price-taking firm
a firm whose actions have no effect on the market price of the g/s it sells
takes market price as given
seen in perfect competition (small and numerous firms)
price-taking consumer
a consumer whose actions have no effect on the market price of the g/s they buy
market price is unaffected by how much they pay
perfectly competitive market
all market participants are price-takers
consumption and production decisions don’t affect the price of the good
supply and demand model
model of a perfectly competitive market
demand is horizontal @ market price (firms can’t charge more, as consumers would buy substitutes; no point in charging less)
perfectly competitive industry
an industry where firms are price-takers
2 necessary conditions for an industry to be perfectly competitive
must contain many small firms, none of whom have a large market share
consumers rehard the products of all firms as equivalent; output is a standardized product
market share
the fraction of the total industry output accounted for by that firm’s output
standardized product/commodity
when customers regard the products of different firms as the same good
producers can’t change prices b/c people will buy subs in a P.C. market
extra feature that characterizes P.C. industries
in the LR it is easy for firms to enter or exit the industry
no obstacles preventing entry (govt. regulations, limited access to key resources)
no costs associated with exit/shutting down business
entry
arrival of new firms into an industry
exit
the departure of firms from an industry
free entry and exit
when new firms can easily enter into the industry and existing firms can easily leave the industry
not needed for P.C., but ensures that # of firms can adjust to changes in market conditions AND firms cannot prevent others from joining
monopolist
a firm that is the only producer of a good with no close substitutes
monopoly
an industry controlled by a monopolist
antitrust laws
made with the intent to prevent monopolies
why can’t other firms just interfere with a monopoly and get in on profits?
barriers to entry that protect monopolists, allowing them to earn economic profits
barrier to entry
something that prevents other firms from entering the industry
protects monopolies and allows them to persist and be profitable
4 main types of barriers to entry
control of a scarce resource/input
economies of scale
technological superiority
government-created barriers
how can control of a scarce input be a barrier to entry?
prevents other from being able to get the input and enter the industry
how can economies of scale be a barrier to entry?
large firms are profitable (ATC decreases as output increases), driving out small businesses
established firms have a cost advantage compared to an entrant (natural monopoly)
natural monopoly
created and sustained by economies of scale; exists when economies of scale provide a large cost advantage to a single firm that produces all of an industry’s output (compared to many firms)
minimum-efficient scale is so large that the monopoly possesses economies of scale over the industry’s relative range of outputs
source of a natural monopoly
large fixed costs; given quantity of output is produced at a lower ATC by one firm as opposed to many
how can technnological superiority be a barrier to entry?
allows for better production
usually a SR barrier → competitores will upgrade
however, not a guarantee of success
why might technological superiority not be a guarantee of success?
network externalities; firm w/ largest network has an advantage in attracting new customers (regardless of how advanced their tech is)
network externalities
when the value of a good to a consumer rises as the number of other people who also use the good rises
how can the government create a barrier to entry?
patents and copyrights
patents
gives an inventor a temporary monopoly in the production, use, and sale of an invention
16-20 years usually
copyright
gives the holder for a literary/artistic work the sole right to profit from that work for a specific period of time
creator’s lifetime + 70 years usually
justification for patents and copyrights
incentives
inventor/creators not protected → little gain, other may copy their work → decreased incentive to event invent/create in the firts place
law allows these temporary monopolies to encourage invention and creation
compromise made with patents and copyrights
while in effect: high prices compensate inventors/creatores
once over: lower prices benefit consumers
oligopoly
an industry with only a small number of firms
oligopolist
a producer in an oligopoly; has market power and can influence prices
imperfect competition
when no one firm has a monopoly, but producers nontheless realize they can affect market prices
2 forms: oligopoly and monopolistic competition
IMPORTANT INFO
oligopoly doesn’t mean large firms, just a few firms
collusion
when oligopolists work togther to limit direction competition, allowing them to raise prices and profits
IMPORTANT INFO
oligopolies can result from the same factors that create monopolies, but just in a weaker form
strong effects → monopoly
weaker effects → oligopoly
2 measures of market power/structure
concentration ratios
Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI)
concentration ratios
measure the percentage of industry sales accounted for by the “X” largest firms
X is any number of firms
4 and 8 concentration ratios are the most common
higher concentration ratio → more concentrated market → more likely to be an oligopoly
Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI)
the square of each firm’s share of market sales summed over the industry
gives more weight to larger firms
produces much larger numbers when a larger share of an industry is dominated by fewer firms
higher HHI → more concentrated market → more likely to be an oligopoly
what provides the incentive for oligopolists to collude?
interdependence
monopolistic competition
when there are many competing firms in an industry, each firm sells a differentiated product, and there is free entry/exit in the LR
producers have slight market power + ability to change prices (enabled by differentiated product, limit by competition from close substitutes)