1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Battery - Definition
Offensive contact with the plaintiff’s person
Battery - Elements
Offensive contact
Contact with the plaintiff’s person
Intent
Battery - Offensive contact - Collins v Wilcock
Any unwanted physical contact
Battery - Offensive contact - Wilson v Pringle
Contact must be hostile
Battery - Offensive contact - Hayward v O’Keefe
Handcuffed innocent butcher
Battery - Contact with the plaintiff’s person - Garratt v Dailey
Chair pulled away
Battery - Contact with the plaintiff’s person - Pursell v Horn
Clothing counts
Battery - Intent - Williams v Humphrey
Pool prank
Battery - Intent - Vaihu
Police dog had mind of its own
Assault - Definition
Reasonable fear of imminent harmful/offensive contact
Assault - Elements
Overt act
Reasonable apprehension
Immediate battery
Intent
Assault - Overt act - Barton v Armstrong
Phone threats
Words alone do generally do not constitute assault but words can create or negate assault
Assault - Immediate battery - Thomas v NUM
Threats from buses not immediate
Assault - Intent - Siri v Speedy
No intent
Assault - Intent - T v H
No conduct, no immediacy, no intent
False imprisonment - Definition
Deliberate confinement
False imprisonment - Elements
Positive act
Complete confinement
Intention
False imprisonment - Positive act - Robinson v Balmain
Turnstile
False imprisonment - Positive act - Herd v Weardale
Miner
False imprisonment - Positive act - Exception
Prior responsibility
False imprisonment - Complete confinement - Bird v Jones
Partial obstruction insufficient
False imprisonment - Complete confinement - Stent
Kept out of NZ but free in Australia
False imprisonment - Complete confinement - Grahame-White Aviation
Need not know confinement
False imprisonment - Intention - Iqbal
Recklessness sufficient
False imprisonment - Intention - Thompson
Administrative mistake insufficient
IIED - Definition
Outrageous conduct causing physical injury or recognised psychiatric illness
IIED - Elements
Unjustifiable conduct
Damage
Intent
IIED - Unjustifiable conduct - Wilkinson v Downton
Husband injured lie
IIED - Unjustifiable conduct - Stevenson v Basham
Burn house threats
IIED - Unjustifiable conduct - Janvier v Sweeney
False spy accusation
IIED - Unjustifiable conduct - Rhodes
Must be directed toward claimant
IIED - Unjustifiable conduct - Fielding v McIntyre
Not directed at claimant
IIED - Damage - Bradley v Wingnut
Distress insufficient
IIED - Damage - Rhodes
Physical harm or recognised psychiatric illness
IIED - Intent - Bradley v Wingnut
Intent may be imputed
IIED - Intent - Rhodes
Actual intent required
IIED - Intent - ABC v West Health 2000
Intent inferred where consequences obvious