temperature, housing, water, air pollution, altitude
12
New cards
host factors
age, sex, genetic profile, family history
13
New cards
horizontal transmission
transmission between members of the same species
14
New cards
vertical transmission
transmission between mother to embryo/fetus/baby
15
New cards
direct transmission
person-to-person contact
16
New cards
indirect transmission
ingestion, aerial, inanimate object, latrogenic
17
New cards
vectors
- indirect route of transmission from animal to human - 75% of all diseases - zoonotic (between animals and humans)
18
New cards
Subclinical Disease
when you don't show symptoms of illness ex. cases of polio
19
New cards
Clinical Disease
shows symptoms - preclinical aren't yet apparent but will become clinical
20
New cards
Persistent Chronic Disease
Infection persists for years
21
New cards
Latent Disease
infection w no active multiplication of the agent
22
New cards
Infected Vs Diseased
infected: host is invaded by organisms and hosts immune system responds diseased: infection causes clinical signs and symptoms
23
New cards
Carrier
harbours the organism but isn't infected - can still infect others but at a lower risk than other infections
24
New cards
endemic, epidemic, pandemic
Endemic: presence of a disease within a given area (flu in ON) Epidemic: occurence in a region of similar illnesses (malaria in canada) Pandemic: worldwide epidemic (SARS, small pox)
25
New cards
Incubation Period
from the time of infection to the time of onset clinical illness - you don't show symptoms of disease during this time
26
New cards
Latent period
time between exposure to the cause of the disease and being able to detect the disease state once its underway
- born with this immunity - immediate response to invaders by WBCs, skin, acid
29
New cards
Acquired Immunity
naturally occurs when a person is exposed to a live pathogen and primary immune response creates antigens against it
30
New cards
herd immunity
- balance between susceptible and those who are immune - resistant individuals protect the entire population - 3 qualifiers: infectious agent is restricted to 1 host species, infection has to induce solid immunity, random mixing of individuals, direct transmission
31
New cards
Error vs Bias
error: due to sample or chance bias: systemic error due to flaws in study design. affects validity. types of bias: selection, information, confounding
32
New cards
Association
sequence of studies: clinical observations, available data, case-control studies, cohort studies, randomized trials 1. find out if theres an association 2. if theres an association, find out if the association is causal or confounding
33
New cards
Direct Causation
factors directly causes a disease without any intermediates
34
New cards
Indirect Causation
factor indirectly causes a disease through intermediate steps
35
New cards
Necessary or Sufficient
- Necessary and Sufficient: without the factor the disease never develops - Necessary but not Sufficient: each of the multiple factors is necessary but none alone are sufficient in developing the disease - Sufficient but not Necessary: factors alone can produce the disease and so can others - Neither Sufficient or Necessary: a factor by itself is not sufficient or necessary to produce the disease
36
New cards
selection bias
- case, controls, exposed, non-exposed individuals were selected so that an apparent association is observed - types of selection bias: exclusion, sampling, non-response, confirmation, loss-follow-up, healthy worker effect
37
New cards
Information Bias
- when the means for getting information about subjects is inadequate and the disease outcomes are incorrect - surrogate interviews, recall bias, reporting bias, wish bias contribute
38
New cards
missclassification bias
when an individual is classified into the wrong category
39
New cards
confounding bias
determining if factor A is the cause of the disease B, factor X is a confounder if: 1. factor X is a known risk factor for disease B, be associated with the exposure 2. factor X is associated with factor A but it isn't a result of factor A. Be associated with the outcome 3. not be a result/caused by the exposure
40
New cards
Screening Tests
population approach on 'healthy' individuals to detect subclinical diseases. indicates diseases in their early days
41
New cards
diagnostic testing
used on sick sick individuals with clinical disease to confirm, classify, inform treatment, provide prognosis
42
New cards
Validity and Reliability on a Graph
- narrow curve indicates its reliable - clustering around the true value (middle) means its valid
43
New cards
Sensitivity (Sn)
- ability of a test to correctly identify those who have the disease - a/(a+c) - as sensitivity increases, the # of false negatives decreases
44
New cards
Specificity (Sp)
- ability of a test to correctly identify those who do not have the disease - d/(b+d) - as specificity the # of false positives decreases
45
New cards
SNOUT
if the test is highly sensitive (SN) and you get a -ve result you can confidently rule the disease OUT
46
New cards
SPIN
if the test is highly specific (SP) and you get a +ve, you can confidently rule the disease IN
47
New cards
Type I error is a ________
false positive
48
New cards
Type II error is a ________
false negative
49
New cards
n =
a + b + c + d
50
New cards
True Prevalence
- actual proportion of disease within a population determined by the results of the gold standard test - TP = (a+c)/n
51
New cards
Apparent Prevalence
- observed proportion of the disease determined by the result of the new test - AP = (a+b)/n
52
New cards
Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
- The probability that a person with a positive test result is truly positive - PPV = a / (a+b) - PPVs over 90% are needed - 1 - PPV = prevalence
53
New cards
Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
- proportion of those that test negative that are truly negative - d/(c+d)
54
New cards
Changing Prevalence Affects Predictive Value
- if prevalence values increase, PPV increases, NPV decreases - changing prevalence values does not affect Sp or Sn
55
New cards
Sequential Testing (2 stage)
- less invasive, less expensive, less uncomfortable - 2nd test is more expensive and has greater Sn and Sp - reduces the amount of false positives, but miss false negatives - you gain net Sp, lose Sn - individual must test +ve on both tests to be considered diseased
56
New cards
Simultaneous/Parallel Testing
- multiple tests given at the same time. Results are combined for interpretation. - only if both results are -ve is the individual considered negative - good at preventing false negatives - prevent false-negatives - gain net Sn - more expensive and invasive
57
New cards
Reliability
the ability of test accurate results when repeated over time
58
New cards
Intrasubject Variation
- change in an individual over time. related to aging, attitudes and taste buds
59
New cards
intraobserver variation
different interpretations by the same person that can be influenced by training, context, experience
60
New cards
interobserver variation
this is related to 2+ people disagreeing on the interpretation of a test
61
New cards
chance agreement
situation where 2 individuals make the same assessment due to chance alone rather than true agreement
62
New cards
Kappa Statistic
- used to measure agreement with multiple observers or the agreement between 2 tests - beyond chance > 0.8 means excellent - (observed agreement - expected agreement)/(1 - expected agreement)
63
New cards
Mortality
refers to death
64
New cards
Morbidity
diseased state
65
New cards
incidence rate per 1000
- defined as the new # of cases occurring in the population in a period of time / # of persons who are at risk of developing the disease during that period of time
66
New cards
attack rate
time associated with the denominator of the incidence
67
New cards
prevalence
= # of affected persons present in the population at a specific time / # of persons in the population - this measures the existing cases - = incidence x duration - "being diseased"
68
New cards
point prevalence
prevalence of disease at a point in time
69
New cards
period prevalence
how many people have had the disease at any point during a certain time period.
70
New cards
Incidence risk
Measure of new cases of a disease or injury occurring in a population during a specified period of time. - new cases only in the numerator - "probability of becoming diseased" - = (# of new cases)/(NAR - 1/2 withdrawals) - (# of new cases)/(NAR x time period) - true rate
(# dying from specific disease) / (NARavg x ITC) - true rate
75
New cards
relative risk
- (risk of disease or outcome in the exposed group) / (risk of disease or outcome in the non-exposed group) - RR = [a / (a + b)] / [c / (c + d)] - RR=1 means theres no association between the exposure and the outcome
76
New cards
Odds Ratio
(odds of disease in the exposed group)/(odds of disease in the non-exposed group) - OR = (a*d)/(b*c)
77
New cards
Relative Risk Statement
If RR = 8.48. The risk of brain tumours among those who use cell phones is 8.48 times the risk in those who don't use cell phones
78
New cards
Odds ratio statement
if OR = 18.8 the odds of brain tumours among cell phone users are 18.8 times the odds of brain tumours among people who don't use their cell phones
79
New cards
Incidence Rate Ratio
- IRR = (IR in the exposed group)/(IR in non-exposed group)
80
New cards
Risk Difference
- (risk/rate in exposed) - (risk/rate in non-exposed) - RD = [ a / (a + b)] - [c / (c + d)] - if RD = 0 the exposure has no effect on the outcome - if RD > 0 - possibly causal - if RD < 0 - possibly protective
81
New cards
Attributable Proportion
- proportion of risk of the outcome in the exposed group that is attributable to that specific exposure = RD / (risk/rate of outcome in exposed) = RD / [ a / (a+b)]
82
New cards
Population Attainable Risk/Rate
= [(prevalence of outcome in the population) - (prevalence in non-exposed group)] / (prevalence of outcome in the population)
83
New cards
target population
population where it might be possible to extrapolate results
84
New cards
source population
Population from which study subjects are drawn.
85
New cards
sampling frame
list of individuals in the source populations where subject are drawn from
86
New cards
sampling unit
actual unit of measurement
87
New cards
sampled population
group of sampling units that was actually selected from the sampling frame
88
New cards
Internal Validity
- degree to which the observed findings in a study lead to correct inferences about the outcome of interest in the source population - ability of a study to provide accurate info
89
New cards
External Validity
- degree to which inferences drawn from the suited can be generalized to the broader pop. of interest
90
New cards
Non Probability Sampling
- choosing study subjects in a non-random way. every member doesn't have an equal chance of getting chosen - ex. convenience, judgment and purposive sampling - easy, cheap, biased, prevents extrapolation
91
New cards
Convenience sampling
sampling where units are chosen because they are easy to get
92
New cards
judgment sampling
sampling where the investigator chooses what he or she deems to be units that are representative of the population
93
New cards
purposive sampling
- sampling where units are chosen on purpose because of their exposure and disease status
94
New cards
Probability Sampling
- random process so all individuals have a non-zero probability of being selected for the study - representative sample, time-consuming, requires large samples ex. simple, systemic, stratified sampling
95
New cards
simple random sampling
fixed % of the source population being chosen using a random process. everyone has an equal chance of being included
96
New cards
system random sampling
- uses sampling interval - 1st person is chosen using random process then the sampling interval picks the next nth person
97
New cards
stratified random sampling
break down the sampling frame into strata, sub categories
98
New cards
cluster sampling
sampling unit is group of subjects with characteristics in common ex. a household, herd of animals
99
New cards
Variance
- p * q - p is the proportion of individuals that have a disease - q is the proportion of individuals that don't have the disease
100
New cards
Level of Confidence (Z)
level of confidence that the estimate will obtain the true value