Module 2: The Quality Improvement Process

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/29

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering quality improvement methodologies, steps, tools, and stakeholder management concepts from Module 2.

Last updated 1:51 AM on 9/23/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

30 Terms

1
New cards

Quality Improvement (HRSA Definition)

Systematic and continuous actions that lead to measurable improvement in healthcare services and the health status of targeted patient groups.

2
New cards

Generic Quality Improvement Process

A 10-step model introduced by Nancy R. Tague in The Quality Toolbox divided into three phases: Planning and Analysis, Implementation and Measurement, and Standardization.

3
New cards

Six Sigma

A process improvement technique focused on eliminating defects by reducing process errors to six standard deviations below the mean, achieving a 99.99966% error-free rate.

4
New cards

DMAIC Model

The primary tool used in the Six Sigma system, consisting of five stages: Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control.

5
New cards

Lean

A process improvement methodology originating from Toyota in the 1970s that focuses on eliminating excess waste and inefficiency in processes.

6
New cards

Waste (Lean Definition)

The amount of work or process steps that do not directly impact what a customer or patient deems important for the product or service.

7
New cards

Value Stream Mapping (VSM)

A detailed visual process mapping tool required in Lean to scrutinize each step in a process and identify areas of waste and errors.

8
New cards

Model for Improvement

A widely used healthcare quality improvement framework championed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) that uses three fundamental questions to drive small, rapid-cycle tests of change.

9
New cards

PDSA Cycle

A four-stage cycle (Plan-Do-Study-Act) used to carry out small, rapid-cycle tests of change in real work settings to test hypotheses and refine interventions.

10
New cards

Problem Statement

A formal, concise description detailing the current state of an issue without defining aims or root causes, highlighting patient-centered and quantifiable impacts as well as the business case.

11
New cards

Aim Statement

An explicit description of the desired outcome of a project that answers 'What are we trying to accomplish?' by specifying the target population, level of measurable improvement, and timeframe.

12
New cards

5 Wh + 1 H Questions

A tool used to write detailed problem statements by asking Who, When, Where, What (happened / didn't happen), and How often.

13
New cards

SMART Criteria

An acronym defining the requirements of a complete aim statement: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound.

14
New cards

Project Charter

A dynamic guiding document and roadmap that defines project scope, rough aim, and resource needs, acting as a contract between team members and stakeholders.

15
New cards

Stakeholder

Anyone who has an interest in a project and the potential to influence its success or failure.

16
New cards

Internal Stakeholder

Any project-relevant individual who works within the same institution, such as clinicians, nurses, lab technicians, or hospital leadership.

17
New cards

External Stakeholder

Any project-relevant individual or group outside the institution, such as off-site clinic staff, collaborative providers, or partner organizations.

18
New cards

Priority Matrix

An L-shaped scoring chart used to evaluate and rank potential quality improvement projects across key criteria like gaps in care, prevalence, and feasibility.

19
New cards

Impact-Occurrence Priority Matrix

A tool that visually compares the severity/impact of a problem against its frequency/occurrence to help teams decide which projects to pursue.

20
New cards

Multi-Voting

A decision-making method (also called dot voting) where stakeholders place sticker dots on posted project ideas to identify which options have the strongest consensus support.

21
New cards

PICK Chart

A Six Sigma impact-effort matrix that categorizes potential project ideas into four quadrants: Possible, Implement, Challenge, and Kill.

22
New cards

Stakeholder Analysis

An analytical matrix used to chart stakeholders' importance, level of influence, priorities, attitudes, and specific engagement strategies.

23
New cards

Influence-Importance Chart

A 2x2 grid that categorizes stakeholders based on their degree of influence and importance to determine engagement tactics (e.g., Collaborate, Protect and Defend, Involve frequently, Do not spend resources).

24
New cards

Elevator Speech

A 4-part concise project pitch covering what the project is about, why it matters, what success looks like, and what is requested from the stakeholder.

25
New cards

RACI Chart

A responsibility assignment matrix that outlines project tasks and delegates individual roles as Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, or Informed.

26
New cards

Communication Plan

A living document created by the project team to systematically track who needs information, what they need to know, why, who will communicate it, when, and via what channel.

27
New cards

Morbidity and Mortality Conferences

Mandatory recurring institutional meetings where clinicians review adverse outcomes, medical errors, and complications to uncover opportunities for systematic care improvement.

28
New cards

Variance Reporting Systems

Institutional documentation systems used to record incidents inconsistent with standard routines of care, including adverse events, near-misses, and process failures.

29
New cards

Vizient

An alliance of over 200 non-profit academic medical centers and affiliated hospitals that shares administrative, billing, and clinical data to benchmark performance across institutions.

30
New cards

Naysayer

A opposing stakeholder who risks derailing a project, whose resistance is managed through curious engagement, 5 Whys investigation, and early involvement to foster project ownership.