1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What was the aim?
To investigate the rates of obedience, disobedience, and whistle-blowing in a situation with no physical violence but ethically wrong instructions
What was the experimental design?
Independent measures
What was the procedure?
Participants asked to provide a few names of other students (without a reason), they were then told the cover story which included “negative effects of sensory deprivation”, they were then instructed to write a statement including positive adjectives such as “incredible” to convince the students previously named to participate
What was the procedure for the comparison group?
They were given a details description of the experiment then asked what they would do in that situation
Who were the participants?
Experiment group - 149 undergraduate students (self selected sampling, mean age 20.8)
Comparison group - 138 students (self selected)
What are the results?
Experiment group - 77% obeyed, 9% blew the whistle
Comparison group - 4% obeyed, 65% blew the whistle
What conclusions can be made?
people tend to obey authority figures, even if the instructions are unethical or unjust
Individuals are bad at predicting their own and other’s behavior