Bocchiaro et al. (2012) - Disobedience and Whistleblowing

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/6

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 2:31 PM on 9/15/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

7 Terms

1
New cards

What was the aim?

To investigate the rates of obedience, disobedience, and whistle-blowing in a situation with no physical violence but ethically wrong instructions

2
New cards

What was the experimental design?

Independent measures

3
New cards

What was the procedure?

Participants asked to provide a few names of other students (without a reason), they were then told the cover story which included “negative effects of sensory deprivation”, they were then instructed to write a statement including positive adjectives such as “incredible” to convince the students previously named to participate

4
New cards

What was the procedure for the comparison group?

They were given a details description of the experiment then asked what they would do in that situation

5
New cards

Who were the participants?

Experiment group - 149 undergraduate students (self selected sampling, mean age 20.8)

Comparison group - 138 students (self selected)

6
New cards

What are the results?

Experiment group - 77% obeyed, 9% blew the whistle

Comparison group - 4% obeyed, 65% blew the whistle

7
New cards

What conclusions can be made?

  • people tend to obey authority figures, even if the instructions are unethical or unjust

  • Individuals are bad at predicting their own and other’s behavior