1/23
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Order of phoneme acquisition
Vowels articulated before consonants
Stops are first consonants acquired, followed by labials —→ alveolars —→ velars —→ alveopalatals
Onsets acquired before codas
Syllable deletion
Stressed syllables more prominent than unstressed, unstressed syllables often deleted from output
Ex: [ru] for kangaroo
Syllable simplification
CV as best syllable shape, onsets and codas are avoided
Deletion
More sonorant elements is deleted
Ex: [taj] for ‘try’
Substitution
Stopping: Obstruent —→ stop ([ti] for ‘sea’)
Fronting: consonant —→ alveolar ( [doʊ] for ‘go’)
Gliding: liquid —→ glide ([weɪn] for ‘lane’)
Denasalization: consonant —→ oral ([spud] for ‘spoon]
Assimilation
Long distance place assimilation ([fɛlf] for ‘self’)
Whole object assumption
The word refers to the whole object
Type assumption
The word refers to a type of thing
Basic level assumption
The word refers to objects that are alike in basic ways
Overextension
The acquired meaning is more general than the intended one
Underextension
The acquired meaning is more specific than the intended meaning
U-shaped learning
Stage 1: words are memorized as a whole, no evidence of morphology
Stage 2: Inflectional morphology is overgeneralized, no irregular morphology yet
Stage 3: adult-like morphology
Wug test
Testing whether children have acquired morphology
Children around 3 can extend inflectional morphology to made up words (nonce words)
Children even younger can reproduce inflectional morphemes in real words but not fake ones
One-word stage
1-1.5 yo, one word is used to convey an entire utterance
Two-word stage
1.5-2 yo, limited number of sentential patterns, often noun & verb or noun & noun
Telegraphic stage
2-2.5 yo, longer sentences with some functional and inflectional morphology missing
Interlanguage grammar
System of mental representations influenced by first and second language and has features of both
L2 learners will substitute a sound from their L1 that shares some features with the target sound
Transfer
A feature or rule from L1 is carried over to the interlanguage grammar
Speech Learning Model (SLM)
Central idea: if the learner classified the L2 sound as equivalent to L1, no new category will be formed
When a sound is similar to one in our L1, we might not hear the difference which can lead to using the L1 sound by mistake, creating accents
L2 sound A and sound X are merged into one category in the interlanguage grammar, making it difficult to accurately learn sound A correctly
Perceptual Assimilation Model (PAM-L2)
Central idea: when listening to a nonnative phone, naive listeners are likely to perceptually assimilate the nonnative phone to the most articulatory similar native phoneme
PAM: Single Category (SC)
Tow nonnative sounds are perceived as equally good/bad of the same native phoneme
PAM: Two Category
Two nonnative sounds are perceived as acceptable exemplars of two different native phonemes
PAM: Category Goodness
Two nonnative sounds are interpreted as different instances of a native phoneme, one being a better example of that phoneme than the other
Factors affecting SLA
age, Individual factors (instrumental: wanting to learn L2 for a specific goal, integrative: Wanting to learn L2 to learn more about a culture), cognitive factors (learning/communication strategies)