1/62
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Elaboration likelihood model
2 routes to persuasion, central route and peripheral route
Central route
Logic and strength of argument, high personal relevance
Peripheral route
Easy to process, superficial cues, low personal relevance
Subliminal stimuli
Stimuli presented below conscious awareness, shaping behaviour, can’t make people do what they oppose
Source characteristics
Attractiveness, credibility, certainty
Sleeper effect
Persuasive message from unreliable source first have little influence but later causes attitude shift. People dissociate source from content overtime
Message characteristics
Quality, vividness, fear, culture
Identifiable victim effect
More moved by individual struggles instead of abstract number of people
Audience characteristics
Need of cognition, mood, age
Message quality
Core values, straightforward, logical, desirable consequences, explicit conclusions, refute opposition, against speakers self interest
Agenda control
Media emphasizing events & topics to shape what people think are important
Hostile media phenomenon
People see media coverage as biased against their own in favour of opponents side
Shared attention
when people believe they are attending to a stimulus at the same time many others are attending to it, they are inclined to process the stimulus more deeply via central route
Thought polarization hypothesis
More extended thought about a particular issue produce more extreme attitudes
Attitude inoculation
Small attacks at people’s beliefs that engage their preexisting attitudes, enable them to counteract a larger attack and resist persuasion
Conformity
Changing one’s beliefs to align with others in response of real/imagined pressure to do so
Compliance
Responding favourably to an explicit request from others
Informational social influence
Taking other’s comments as information source about what’s right
Normative social influence
Desire to avoid other’s disapproval
Internalization
Private acceptance of a ideology
Factors affecting conformity
Group size (3-4)
Anonymity
Expertise
Culture (greater in interdependent cultures)
Tight and loose culture
reasons for mimicry
Thinking about a behaviour makes it more likely to perform that behaviour
Brain region for perception overlap with action
To facilitate smooth social connection
Foot in the door technique
Compliance approach, first make small request then larger request involving real interest
Pluralistic ignorance
Act opposite from their beliefs because they believe others don’t share the same values, which reinforces bad group norm
Descriptive norm
What most people do in a given context
Prescriptive norm
What a person is supposed to behave in a given context
Norm of reciprocity
People should benefit those who benefit them
Reciprocal concessions technique
Compliance technique, ask a large favour then ask a small one with real interest
Negative state relief hypothesis
people agreeing to a request to relieve their negative feelings & feel better about themselves
Reactance theory
People reassert their prerogatives in response to unpleasant state they experience when they feel that their freedoms are threatened
Milgram factors
Opposing forces
Release from responsibility
Step by step involvement
Indecisive disobedience
Modern racism
Prejudice towards racial groups but reject explicitly racist beliefs
Implicit association test
Reveal non conscious attitude towards different groups of people
Affect misattribution procedure
Priming procedure to assess people’s implicit associations to different stimuli
Realistic group theory
Group conflict is likely to arise over competition between groups for limited resources
Ethnocentrism
Glorifying own group while vilifying other groups
Superordinate goal
Goal that transcends interest of any one group, can be achieved by 2/more groups working together
Minimal group paradigms
Make groups based on seemingly meaningless criteria and see how members of the group are inclined to behave more towards one another
Social identity theory
Persons self concept & esteem also comes from the accomplishments of the groups they belong to
Basking in reflected glory
Taking pride in accomplishments of other people in one’s group
Paired distinctiveness
Pairing of 2 distinctive events that stand out even more because occured together
Subtyping
Creating subcategory of the stereotyped group that can be expected to differ from the group as a whole
Out group homogeneity effect
Assuming within group similarity is stronger for out groups than in groups
Own race identification bias
Better able to recognize faces from their own race
Contact hypothesis
Prejudice can be reduced by putting members of different groups in frequent contact with one another
Multiculturalism
Encourage the acknowledgement of people’s cultural backgroud
Colour blindness
Treating others as unique individual
Conditions for contact hypothesis
1) groups need to have equal status
2) must have a shared goal that requires cooperation
3) community’s broader social norms must support intergroup contact
Social dominance theory
Hierarchical nature of society
Anthropomorphism
Attribution of human traits to nonhuman entities
How hierarchies are kept in place
Individual discrimination
Institutional discrimination
Behavioural asymmertries
Stereotype content model
nature of common group stereotypes vary along the 2 prominent dimensions of warmth and competence
Stereotype threat
Fear of confirming the stereotypes that others have about one group
Marley hypothesis
Different racial groups make different assessments of the amount of racism in society today because they differ in their knowledge of racial history
Social intuitionist model of moral judgment
People first have fast emotional reactions to morally relevant events that in turn influence their process of reasoning toward a judgment of right and wrong
Moral foundations theory
5 universal moral domains which specific emotions guide moral judgement
1) care/harm: triggered by signs of vulnerability, elicit sympathy
2) fairness/reciprocity: triggered by unfair acts, elicit anger
3) in group loyalty: evoke group pride and rage
4) authority/respect: embarrassment, shame, envy, pride
5) purity/sanctity: avoiding dangerous diseases, elicit disgust
Selfish motives
1) social reward: benefits gained from helping others
2) personal distress: reduce one’s distress by helping others
Selfless motive
Empathic concern
Kin selection
Evolutionary strategy that favours the reproductive success of one’s genetic relatives at cost of one’s own survival and reproduction
Vagus nerve
Largest bundle of nerves in human nervous system, ancient physiological system promotes social connection, engaged in adults & children when they’re feeling empathic concern
Reciprocal altruism
Helping others with expectations that they will return the favour in future
Prisoner’s dilemma
Payoffs to 2 people who must decide whether to cooperate/defect, cooperation lead to higher joint payoff
Tit for tat strategy
Prisoner’s dilemma strategy, first cooperate, then copy whatever the other person does, works well when used against other strategies