1/112
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Variables in a Quantitative Design
- Dependent
- Independent
- Antecedent
- Extraneous
Antecedent Variable
Something that happens before the research study that impacts the outcome of the research study (Ex Age,
gender, socioeconomic status, and health status)
Extraneous Variable (Mediating Variable)
Things that happen within the study that may affect the study (Ex. Dog in the Hugh Jackman video)
Considerations to Increase Control in a Study
- Objectivity
- Accuracy
- Feasibility
- Homogenous sample
- Constancy
- Manipulation
- Randomization
- Pilot study
Pilot Study
A mini-version of the whole study beforehand to see how well it will work out
2 Main Types of Validity
- Internal
- External
Internal Validity
The degree to which the experimental treatment, not an uncontrolled condition, resulted in the observed effects
Threats to Internal Validity
- History
- Maturation
- Testing
- Instrumentation
- Mortality/Attrition
- Selection bias
History Threat
- Another specific concurrent event, apart from the independent variable, that may affect the dependent variable, either inside or outside the experimental setting
- Ex.) Effect of breastfeeding ads on research that is studying the effects of a breastfeeding education
program on the length of time of breastfeeding
Maturation Effects
- The developmental, biological, or psychological processes that operate within an individual as a function of time
- Ex.) Effect of growing older/wiser on research that is studying the effects of a specific teaching method
Testing Effects
- The effect on the participant's posttest score as the result of having taken a pretest
- Ex.) Individuals generally score higher when
they take a test a second time regardless of the
treatment
Instrumentation Threats
- Changes in the variables or observational techniques that may account for changes in the obtained measurement
- Ex.) An uncalibrated thermometer
Mortality/Attrition
The loss of study participants from the first data-collection point (pretest) to the second data-collection point (posttest)
Selection Bias
- The threat to internal validity that arises when pretreatment differences exist between the experimental group and the control group
- Ex.) Smoking cessation program is offered to all smokers; chances are, only the motivated ones will participate
External Validity
The extent to which the research findings can be generalized to real-world settings
Threats to External Validity
- Selection effects
- Reactive effects
- Measurement effects
Selection Effects
- A threat to external validity that is concerned with the generalizability of the results to other populations
- Important to set inclusion and exclusion boundaries
Reactive Effects (Hawthorne Effect)
- A threat to external validity that is concerned with the participants behaving in a certain way with the investigator not because of the study procedures but merely as an independent response to being studied
- Ex.) Students studying harder because they are being observed
Measurement Effects
A threat to external validity that is concerned with how an administration of a pretest in a study affects the generalizability of the findings to other populations; similar to testing effects
Methodology
A system of methods used in a particular area of study or activity (Ex. Quantitative, qualitative, Indigenous, and mixed methods)
Design
An overall plan for obtaining the information needed to address a research problem or issue (Ex. Randomized control trial, psychometric, phenomenology, non-experimental, etc.)
3 Main Types of Quantitative Designs
- Experimental
- Quasi-experimental
- Non-experimental
Experimental Design
- A research design in which their is randomization of participants and control and manipulation of variable
- Has the highest level of control
- Commonly called randomized clinical trials (RTC)
Advantages of Experimental Design
- Most appropriate for testing cause-and-effect
- Provides highest level of evidence for single studies
Disadvantages of Experimental Design
- Participant mortality, especially control group
- Difficult logistics in field setting
- Hawthorne effect
- Not all research questions can receive appropriate manipulation and randomization
3 Types of Experimental Designs
- True-experimental
- Solomon four-group
- After-only
True-Experimental Design (Classic Experiment)
Type of experimental design with a pre-test, post-test experimental and control group
Solomon Four-Group Design
- Type of experimental design with a pre-test/post-test experimental and control group, and an experimental and control group with no pre-test/pos-test
- Rules out testing effects
- Needs lots of people
After-Only Design
- Type of experimental design with an experimental and control group with no pre-test/post-test
- Only used if a base line is not needed
Key Points in an RCT
- Population
- Randomization
- Blinding
- Preciseness of results
Randomization
- The assignment of participants to either the experimental or the control group on a purely random basis (Ex. Flipping a coin)
- The more equal the groups are in size, the better
Blinding
A technique used in experimental and quasiexperimental research in which the participants are not aware of whether they are receiving the intervention
Double-Blinding
Level of blinding in which both the subjects and investigators are blinded
Triple-Blinding
Level of blinding where subjects, investigators, and managers of the study are blinded
Quasiexperimental Design
- A research design in which the researcher initiates an experimental treatment, but some characteristic of a true experiment is lacking (mainly randomization)
Advantages of Quasiexperimental Design
- Practical and more feasible, especially in clinical settings
- Some generalizability
Dissadvantages of Quasiexperimental Design
- Difficult to make cause-and-effect statements
- Not truly randomized
4 Main Types of Quasiexperimental Design
- Nonequivalent control group
- After-only nonequivalent control group
- One-group pretest post-test
- Time series
Nonequivalent Control Group Design
Type of quasiexperimental design with a pre-test/post-test experimental and control group, but no randomization
After-Only Nonequivalent Control Group Design
Type of quasiexperimental design with an experimental and control group with no pre-test/post-test and randomization
One-Group Pretest Post-Test Design
Type of quasiexperimental design with an experimental group with a pre-test/post-test, but no randomization
Time Series Design
Type of experimental design with an experimental group with two pre-test/post-test, but no randomization
Non-Experimental Design
- Type of research design that examines events, people, and situations as they naturally occur
- Constructs a picture of a phenomenon at one point or over a period of time
Advantages of Nonexperimental Design
- Important to develop knowledge base on a phenomenon of interest
- Useful in forecasting or making predictions
- Important when randomization, control, and manipulation are not appropriate/possible
- Useful in testing theoretical models of how variables work together
Disadvantages of Nonexperimental Design
Diffulty in explaining cause-and-effect relationships
5 Main Types of Non-Experimental Designs
- Survey research
- Relationship/difference studies
- Psychometric research
- Epidemiological
- Secondary analysis
Survey Research
- Type of non-experimental design that involves collecting detailed descriptions of existing variables through questionnaires/interviews
- Only gathers information and doesn't try to determine causation
Advantages of Survey Research
- Large amounts of information is gathered in a more economical manner
- Surprising accuracy of a small # of participants representing the views of the population
Disadvantages of Survey Research
- Information gathered tends to be superficial
- Breadth rather that depth of information is emphasized
- Requires a great deal of expertise in various research areas
- Can be time consuming and costly
2 Types of Relationship/Difference Studies
- Correlational
- Developmental
Correlational Studies
Type of relationship/difference study in which the investigator examines a relationship between two or more variables (not causation)
Advantages of Correlational Studies
- Flexibility
- Collects large amounts of data to examine the relationship
- Has otential for clinical application
- Foundation for future studies
- Explores relationship between variables that can't be manipulated
Disadvantages of Correlational Studies
- Inability to manipulate variables of interest
- No randomization in the sampling procedures
- Can't determine a causal relationship
3 Main Types of Developmental Studies
- Cross-sectional
- Longtitudinal/prospective
- Retrospective
Cross-Sectional Study
Type of developmental study where researchers examine data
at one time to explore relationships between variables
Longitudinal/Prospective Study
Type of developmental study where researchers examine data from the same group at different times
Advantages of Longitudinal Studies
- Each participant acts as their own control
- Increased depth of responses
- Early trends can be analyzed
- Higher level of control than retrospective studies
Disadvantages of Longitudinal Studies
- Data collection can take a long time, requiring a lot of resources
- Testing effects may be a threat
- Mortality is a significant threat
Retrospective Study (Ex Post Facto)
Type of developmental study where the researcher attempts to link current events to the past
Advantages of Retrospective Studies
- Similar to the correlational design
- Higher level of control than correlational
- More time efficient
Disadvantages of Retrospective Studies
- Unable to prove causation
- Alternative hypothesis may be the reason for the documented relationship
- Difficulty of finding similar group members
- Challenging to find clear data because memory is not perfect
Psychometric (Methodological) Research
Type of non-experimental design involve in the development and evaluation of data collection instruments, scales, and techniques
Epidemiological Studies
Type of non-experimental design that involves examining the factors affecting the health and illness of populations
Prevalence
The # of people affected
Incidence
The # of cases occurring in a particular period of time
Secondary Analysis
A form of research in which the previously collected and
analyzed data from one study are reanalyzed for a
secondary purpose
Systematic Reviews
A summation and assessment of research studies found in the literature based on a clearly focused question that uses systematic and explicit methods to identify, select, critically appraise, and analyze relevant data from the selected studies to summarize the findings in a focused area
Meta-Analysis
A type of systematic review that combines the statistical findings of two or more separate studies and analyzes them
Key Characteristics of a Systematic Review
- A clear, pre-defined research question
- A transparent, reproducible methodology
- A systematic search that attempts to identify all studies that would meet the criteria
- An assessment of the validity of the findings of the included studies
- A systematic presentation and synthesis of the characteristics and findings of the included studies
Advantages of Meta-Analysis
- Better estimate of treatment
- More complete evidence
- Produces a pooled or summary effect
Disadvantages of Meta-Analysis
Needs multiple studies that are somewhat similar
Sampling
The process of selecting representative units of a population for study in a research investigation
Inclusion Criteria
- Characteristics that prospective subjects must have to be in the study (Ex. You need to be a woman to participate in a study related to pregnancy)
- Needs a balance between narrowness and broadness
If the inclusion criteria is too narrow . . .
Results will not be generalizable
If the inclusion criteria is too broad . . .
- It will reduce the effect size
- There will be issues with compliance
Exclusion Criteria (Delimitations)
Characteristics that have clear contraindications of participating in a study (Ex. You can't participate in a milk study if your lactose intolerant)
Sample
A set of elements that make up the population
Element
The most basic unit about which information is
collected (Ex. Individuals, places, objects)
2 Types of Sampling
- Probability
- Nonprobability
Nonprobability Sampling
Type of sampling in which elements are chosen through non-random methods
3 Types of Nonprobability Sampling
- Convenience
- Quota
- Purposive
Convenience Sampling
Type of nonprobability sampling that uses the most readily available population (Ex. The first 25 people to volunteer)
Quota Sampling
Type of nonprobability sampling in which knowledge about the
population of interest is used to ensure some
representativeness about the sample; adds categorization
Probability Sampling
Type of sampling that uses randomization to assign elements
3 Types of Probability Sampling
- Simple random
- Stratified random
- Systematic
Simple Random Sampling
Type of probability sampling in which all units within a population are identified, and units are randomly selected (Ex. Table with random numbers associated with each units)
Stratified Random Sampling
Type of probability that is the same as quota sampling, but selection is random
Systematic Sampling
Type of probability sampling that
involves the selection of every “kth” case drawn
from a population list at fixed intervals (Ex. Picking every 10th member from the lists of volunteers)
3 Main Requirements of Data Collection
- Objective
- Systematic
- Consistent
4 Main Types of Quantitative Data Collection Methods
- Physiological/biological measurements (Ex. Vital signs)
- Observational methods
- Interviews/questionnaires
- Records or available data
4 Conditions of Scientific Observations
- Observations are consistent with the study's objectives and theoretical framework
- Standardized and systematic plan for observation and recording of data
- Training of data collectors
- All observations are checked and controlled
4 Types of Scientific Observation Methods
- Concealment with intervention
- Concealment without intervention
- No concealment without intervention
- No concealment with intervention
Example of Concealment with Intervention
A researcher secretly observes hand hygiene compliance in a hospital by installing hidden cameras and then implements an educational program to improve compliance
Example of Concealment without Intervention
A researcher discreetly observes customer shopping behaviors in a supermarket through security cameras without introducing any changes to the store layout or promotions
Example of No Concealment Without Intervention
A researcher openly observes classroom interactions by sitting at the back of the room and taking notes without influencing the lesson or student behavior
Example of No Concealment with Intervention
A researcher openly conducts a study on exercise habits by leading a fitness program in a community center while observing participants' engagement and progress
Validity
Refers to whether a measurement instrument accurately measures what it is intended to measure
4 Main Types of Validity
- Construct
- Content
- Face
- Criterion-related
Construct Validity
The degree to which a test measures the concept that it's intended to measure (Ex. Confirming that IQ test scores correlate with problem-solving ability and academic performance but not with unrelated traits like height)
Content Validity
The degree to which a test fully represents what it aims to measure (Ex. Making sure that the final exam includes questions that comprehensively cover all the key topics taught in the course, rather than focusing on just a few sections)