Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Competition -/-
Both species do worse in each others’ presence than they do if the other is absent
Amensalism 0/-
One species is unaffected while the other is harmed
Beetles positively affected by ibex removal, ibex are unaffected by beetle removal
Exploitation -/+
Predator-prey, parasite-host
Neutral 0/0
Two species inhabit the same area but do not affect each other
Commensalism 0/+
Scavenging birds benefit from wolf presence because they feed on carrion
Mutualism +/+
Acacia trees and ants. Thorns provide shelter and food, ants scare away other predators/competitors
Parasitism
Parasites do not usually kill their host
Live in or on their host’s body, eating fluids or tissue
Passive transmission
An infective life state of the parasite lurks where it is likely to encounter a new host
Active transmission
Move around seeking new hosts
Direct host-to-host transmission
Intermediate strategy in which parasites do not leave on host until they encounter another
Endoparasites
Living and feeding inside their hosts
Slowly feeding on developed tissue, steady food supply
Classified as pathogens because they cause diseases
Tapeworms, flukes, fungi
Immune system of the host will try to attack the parasite, must have a mechanism to cope with the host’s defenses
Skin coating around larva
Ectoparasites
Live on the outside surface of their host
Vines, ticks, fleas, leeches
Eat skin, blood, body fluids
More easily transmitted among hosts
Avoid having to defend themselves against immune systems
They are exposed to predation and harsh exterior environments
Cleaner wrasse
Eats parasites off of fish
Yellow billed oxpeckers
Eats parasites off of buffalo, giraffe
Hosts have mutualistic relationships with ectoparasite consumers
The human body as a habitat
The most serious parasite-caused illnesses are from endoparasites
They are difficult to attack with drugs
Parasites are more closely related to humans than bacteria
Parasitoids
Kill their hosts
Develop inside their host and eat them from the inside out
Once the host is fully consumed, the parasitoid transformers into an adult
Intermediate between predators
Common among wasps
Commonly used to control crop pests
Pea aphids on alfalfa and soybean crops with a parasitoid wasp
Hyperparasitoid
Secondary parasitoid
Parasite of a parasite
Lay eggs inside the the larva inside the host
Herbivory
Grazers
Specialize on herbaceous plants
Browsers
Eat the leaves, bark, and twigs of woody plants
Granivores
Specialize on seeds
Seed predators
Frugivores
Specialize on fruits
Mammalian grazers/browser have mutualistic associations with symbiotic organisms that are capable of cellulose digestion
Bacteria in the cecum in snowshoe hares
Fecal reingestion
Plant defenses against herbivory (4)
Chemical
Producing chemicals that are noxious or poisonous to herbivores
Mechanical
Developing structures like thorns that make is harder for animals to eat them
Nutritional
Growing structures that are less nutritious
Tolerance
Adaptations to regrow quickly after being grazed
Impact of herbivory on plant communities
Reduce the overall number of plants and can also have a profound impact on the composition of a plant community
Bog birch
Over-browsing by hares
Likely to affect communities when they feed on a plant that is a strong competitor
Goldenrod leaf-miner, allows for higher diversity since they are eating a strong competitor
When plants have evolved without selective pressure, they are not well-defended
Predation methods (4)
Stalking
Remaining undetected until they are close enough to pounce
Pursuit
Chasing prey, speed and stamina
Ambush
Lies in wait to ambush
Random encounter
Spiders randomly capturing insects in webs
Animal defenses against predation (6)
Chemical
Producing noxious or poisonous chemicals
Physical
Developing physical barriers to predation
Shells
Aposematism
Warning colors or sounds to alarater predators that they are not tasty
Monarch butterfly, tree frogs
Crypsis
Camouflage to hide from predators
Mimicry
Looking, sounding, other forms of mimicry to seem like a species a predator would want to avoid
Behavioral
Behaving in ways that minimizes risk form predation
Predator-Prey Population Cycling
Adjusting predation and prey growth rates cannot eliminate cycling and cannot cause prey to go extinct
Growth of the predator population lags behind growth of the prey population because the abundance of prey stimulates predator population growth
Deterministic
The values of the parameters and the initial population sizes determine exactly what will happen
Stochastic
Includes randomness
Interactions among trophic levels
Prey can also be strongly affected by the availability and quality of their food
Krebs
Haresin the canadian forest seem to be limited by a combination of lynx predation and scarce food
Combined effect of excluding predation and increasing food was successful
Ecology of fear
As predation reduce the size of a prey population, the predator population shrinks because there is less food, which allows the prey population to recover
Predators don’t drive prey to extinction
An efficient predator can bring populations close to extinction
Assumptions for LV
There are no effects of crowding
Both populations are equally likely to meet each other
The prey species is the only food
The predator is the only significant cause of death for the prey
Predators can eat prey instantaneously
There is no immigration or emigration
Prey density dependence
Growth rate could depend on density
Food limitation
Intraspecific competition
At higher prey densities, fewer predators are required to restrict further prey population growth
If the prey population reaches K, it cannot grow even if there are no predators at all
If prey are density dependent and the prey population has increased beyond K, the predator population will grow and the prey population will shrink
Density dependence is higher when K is lower, population stabilize faster
More realistic predator population
Predator populations time do the self-limiting due to territoriality, home range size requirements, and interference competition
With stronger predator self-limitation, predator populations will be smaller and prey populations will be larger at the stable equilibrium point
Adding heterogeneity: prey refuges
Density-depend limitations can increase stability in predator and prey populations and are another likely explanation how prey populations can survive predation
Predator-prey relationship is no the only factor regulation population sizes
Size of the populations are eq will still be affected by the rates of growth, predation, conversion, and mortality
What would prevent a predator from being efficient
Prey defenses, space, mixing
With efficient predator and refuges for prey, the system tend more quickly toward the stable eq population sizes
With a less efficient predator and refuges for prey, the system oscillates more, and tend more slowly toward the stable equilibrium population sizes
Refuges
Burrows, tree holes, dense vegetation
Lower the predator efficiency, increasing the chance that prey population will not be driven to extinction
Hiding in the dark, safety in numbers, mast-seeding
Metapopulations
A collections of spatially distinct subpopulations of the same species that are connected via dispersal
Patchiness in populations can promote stability in predator prey systems and help avoid extinctions
Functional response
Which describes how an individual predator’s feeding rate depends on prey density
Type 1 functional response
Shows a linear increase with prey density until it hits a maximum threshold, where it levels off
Not common, only if handling time was so minimal that it could eat as soon as prey was found
spiders
Handling time
Amount of time that it takes a predator to kill as consume one item of prey
Does not include the time spent finding the prey
Type II
The predator’s rate of prey consumption increases with increasing prey density, but not in direct proportion to it
Increase as a curve
As prey densities get higher, the rate of increase in consumption rate gets smaller, gradually levels off
Type III
Levels off at high prey densities
At lower prey densities there is a slower initial increase in the predation rate with increasing prey density. Predators have to learn how to catch these prey, ignore them until a certain density
S shaped curve
Seals wait to pursue until the salmon density is high enough
Search image
Improve their ability to detect prey by focusing on certain cues associated with that prey
Will only be advantageous if they prey is abundant enough
Prey switching
Frequency dependent predation, occurs when predators show a preference for the most abundant type of prey
specialists do not do it
Generalists
Engage in prey switching
Associated with type III
Coevolution
Occurs when two species that live in close association both adapt in response to selective pressure from the other
Diffuse
With a number of species coevolving in response to each other
Specific
Two species coevolving
Selection favors high genetic variation
Continuous shifts in allele frequencies and can maintain high diversity in both host and parasite genotypes
Reciprocal selection
When two species both exert pressure on the other through natural selection
Garter snake TTX resistance and newt TTX strength
Involves tradeoffs
Red queen hypothesis
Species that evolve fast enough to keep up with/outpace evolution in their enemies will generally persist longer than those that evolve more slowly
A species and its enemies continually evolve to keep in the same place
Recombination
Occurs through sexual reproduction and the process of crossing over during meiosis
Leads to offspring with different combination of genes than either of the parents and is important for maintaining genetic diversity in population
Sexual reproduction is costly
Finding a mate, men are useless, recombination,
Sex speeds up the rate of evolution, improving the ability to survive in a red-queen world
Offspring have a higher change of possessing a novel combination of alleles that facilitates success in changing environment