Schenck vs US (1919)
Free speech is not absolute, proximity and degree matter. Argued that the draft was slavery during WWI. Established “clear and present danger” test and prohibitions on free speech
Gitlow vs New York (1925)
Selective Incorporation Doctrine - the bill of rights will be applied to the states through the 14th on a case by case basis. During the red scare, publishing in news paper from socialist view
1/26
cases
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Schenck vs US (1919)
Free speech is not absolute, proximity and degree matter. Argued that the draft was slavery during WWI. Established “clear and present danger” test and prohibitions on free speech
Gitlow vs New York (1925)
Selective Incorporation Doctrine - the bill of rights will be applied to the states through the 14th on a case by case basis. During the red scare, publishing in news paper from socialist view
Brandenburg vs Ohio (1969)
Direct Incitement Test - intentional, imminence and likelihood of violence
Snyder vs Phelps (2011)
Westborough Baptist church protesting at funerals of soldiers. Allow free speech, results in counterprotest. Congress checks S.C. with law to keep protests a certain distance
Tinker vs Des Moines (1969)
Substantial Disruption Test. Students do not lose their constitutional rights in school but is narrowed. Arm bands
Morse vs Frederick (2007)
Hits for jesus. School won and narrowed free speech. Clarence Thomas writes concurring and wishes to overrule Tinker
Weeks vs US (1914)
Establishes Exclusionary Rule - evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible. Need a warrant
Mapp vs Ohio (1961)
Incorporated the exclusionary rule
Maryland vs Garrison (1987)
Adds the Honest Mistake Exception, Good Faith, Inevitable Discovery. Officers went into the wrong apartment and found evidence
NJ vs T.L.O (1984)
Need reasonable suspicion in public schools, principle not police can check. Lower standard then the probable cause
Gideon vs Wainwright (1963)
Incorporated Right to council
Miranda vs Arizona (1966)
Rights are read to you, gives access to rights for the police, 5th and 6th amendments
NY Times vs Sullivan (1964)
Slander and libel against public officials. Sullivan test, False, damaging, actual malice
Miller vs California (1973)
L.A.P.S. test for obscenity. Literary, Artistic, Political, Scientific. TPM matters, Time Place, Manner, based on community standards. obscene sculpture
Texas vs Johnson (1989)
allows the burning of the american flag, protected under first amendment
US vs Nixon (1974)
Executive privilege is not absolute. watergate
NY Times vs US (1971)
Upheld prohibition against prior restraint (the illegal suppression of materials prior to publication on the grounds that they will be harmful or libelousn, government censorship). Pentagon papers
Everson vs Board of education (1947)
Incorporated exclusionary rule, wall between church and state - used wrong by black
Engel vs Vitale (1962)
No recitation of prayer in public schools
Employment of Division of Oregon vs Smith (1990)
Narrowed free exercise rights. Native Americans fired for drug use although it was for religious purposes
Wisconsin vs Yoder (1972)
Broadens free exercise rights. Free exercise vs compulsory education. Children not wanting to attend public school as it goes against religious values
Masterpiece Cake vs Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018)
Discriminating due to religious beliefs. Believed it was compelled speech to design a wedding cake for a gay couple.
D.C. vs Heller (2008)
Upheld individual rights to bear arms, heard amicus from parents of killed. Had been law in D.C against owning handguns. NRA
McDonald vs Chicago (2010)
incorporated 2nd amendment
Plessy vs Ferguson (1896)
separate but equal. Guy on the train who was 1/8 black
Brown vs Board of Education (1) (1954)
Ends segregation in public schools de jure
Brown vs Board of Education (2)
Mandate to end segregation in schools at all possible speed