1/27
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Failure to Function Adequately
Behaviour consider abnormal when it causes distress leading to an inability to cope with the demands of everyday life
‘Demands’ refer to day-to-day activities such as getting up in the morning, eating regularly, communicating with others etc.
The abnormal behaviour being shown is maladaptive, irrational or dangerous
Abnormality is when a lack of proper functioning causes personal distress for others, e.g. disruption work or personal relations
e.g. not being able to hold down a job, interact meaningfully with others, make yourself understood
First feature of personal dysfunction
Personal distress
Description of feature
Includes depression and anxiety disorders.
Example of feature
Fixating, low mood
Second feature of personal dysfunction
Maladaptive behaviour
Description of feature
Behaviour stopping individuals from attaining life goals, both socially and occupationally.
Example of feature
Pulling out of meeting friends
Third feature
Unpredictability
description
Displaying unpredicted behaviours characterised by loss of control, like attempting suicide after failing a test.
example
You do not feel like you are in the driver's seat of your life, you cannot control your life, behaviour may look unpredictable
fourth feature
Irrationality
description
Displaying behaviour that cannot be explained in a rational way.
example
Jumping to conclusions
fifth feature
Observer discomfort
description
Displaying behaviour causing discomfort to others.
example
Makes others feel worried
sixth feature
Violation of moral standards
description
Displaying behaviour violating society’s moral standards.
example
Not conforming to social norms
seventh feature
Unconventionality
description
Displaying behaviour that doesn’t conform to rules.
example
Social rules, unwritten rules - not conforming to them
Strength
P - strength is that is represents a sensible threshold for when people need professional help
E - most of us have symptoms of mental disorder to some degree at some time
According to MH charity Mind, around 25% of people in UK will experience a MH problem in any given year
However, many people press on in face of fairly severe symptoms
Tends to be at point that we cease to function adequately that people seek professional help/are noticed + referred by others
K - Criterion means that treatment + services can be targeted to those who need them most
Weakness
P - limitation is that it is easy to label non-standard lifestyle choices as abnormal
E - In practice, it can be hard to say when someone is really failing to function adequately
Not having a job might seem like failing to function adequately, and for some, it would be
However, people with alternative lifestyles choose to live ‘off-grid’
K - this means that people who make unusual choices are at risk of being labelled abnormal + freedom of choice may be restricted
Strength
P - strength is that it considers the impact of behaviour on an individual’s everyday life
E - Rosenhan and Seligman identified criteria such as maladaptiveness and personal distress, which indicate whether a person’s behaviour prevents them from functioning effectively
K - therefore, FFA is useful as it focuses on an individual’s ability ro cope, making it a more practical definition of whether behaviour is causing difficulty rather than simply being ‘different’
Weakness
P - FFA can be culturally relative
E - differen cultures have different expectation about what is considered normal behaviour and how people should function in everyday life
Therefore, behaviour that is considered maladaptive in one culture, may be accepted/expected in another
Psychologists could wrongly identify culturally different behaviour as abnormal
K - This suggests that FFA has limited validity as a universal definition as it may reflect expectations of a single culture rather than a MH disorder
Strengths
Set-criteria is clear, making it easy to define what failing to function in day to day life looks like
Holistic view of abnormality
More individual autonomy - diagnosis = more effective, acknowledges more of the impact on the individual
Observable - easy to identify
Can be used when interviewing patients
Weaknesses
Subjective, based on observations of behaviour
Still relies on judging behaviours based on severity/how extreme the behaviour is
Could there be any behaviours missed by the criteria, too reductive?
If behaviour is misinterpreted, could lead to misdiagnosis
Context-dependent, we all struggle to function at times + individual differences