Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
east India Company
company that traded with with India and Tas Monopoly founded in 1600 and ruled India via private armies and company rule began in 1757
empire
colony
province
Large regional areas of land in India
princely state
States ran by Maharajahs under favourable treaties which helped Britain retain power with little effort
viceroy
Appointed by Secretary of state to be in charge of India. This role was based in India and lasted five years.
Secretary of state
Political ruler of India appointed by Prime Minister and leader of Viceroys. Reports to P M and governs India Council.
Indian civil service
Run India on behalf of the British government. Served viceroy and pyramid of power from Viceroy to town level.
All-India National Congress
Founded in 1885 by mostly high cast in Hindus that were well educated to form resolutions and demand things from the Raj such as more money spent on infrastructure.
Muslim league
Formed in 1906 for non members of the INC acted as voice for Muslim communities and opposed democracy. Created at the annual Muhammadan Educational Conference in Dhaka, initially with 3000 delegates
Home rule Leagues
Two nationalist organisations formed a 1917 that 60,000 joined within a year. They were run by Bal Tilak and Annie Bessant.
DOIA
Emergency criminal law enacted in nineteen fifteen to stop nationalist activities by granting executive powers such as restriction of speech
Lucknow pact (1916)
Deal signed by ML and INC with support from HRL 's for Indians to have input in government and pressured Great Britain.
GOIA
passed into law in December nineteen nineteen and instituted dyarchy
Dyarchy
Shared power at the provincial level 50/50
What was the East India Company
trades with India and has monopoly
Exploited natural resources, e.g. Precious metals
Founded in 1600 and ruled after 1757- royal charter from Liz
Ruled large areas of India via private armies
Portugal, Spain, France and GB all after India
Rule ended in 1858 with GOIA and crown assumed direct control
Reasons for Battle of Plassey
1756 uprising against East India Company at Fort William in Calcutta
British captured and put in tiny jail
many suffocated in heat and cramped conditions 123 out of 146 died in hours
this infuriated Britain and became known as the black hole of Calcutta
to defeat the Maharaja of Bengal and in and secure province for E I C
Outcome of the Battle of Plassey
23rd of June 1757
Clive and Mirjafar, Nawab of Bengal defeated the Nawab Siraj ud Davlah
secured Bengal under EIC and set foundation for two hundred years of British rule
sir Robert Clive, leader of British Army
Calcutta becomes India's capital city to Britain
Causes of the Indian mutiny
1853: Lee Enfield P - 53 rifled musket introduced and used in India from 1857
needed to buy paper cartridge to apply musket ball but this was greased with beef and pork fat ; offended Hindus and Muslims as Hindus or cows as sacred and Muslims as they didn't eat pork
Sepoys of both religions offended sparking mutiny
it was a rebellion from British the British perspective but the first war over independence for India
What did Britain do after the mutiny to restore control?
EIC replaced by new royal government of India the British Raj, after the government of India act 1858
India Guardians of traditions to be under authoritarian British rule
in 1877 Disraeli makes Queen Victoria Empress of India, linking monarchy to Empire and India closer to Britain - this was known as the Royal Titles Bill and Victoria became a symbol of the empire
the EIC was blamed and disbanded as the government seized control and directly controlled by parliament
treated with severe retribution as many were killed: six thousand British and over eight hundred thousand Indians were killed
Secretary of State for India
Political ruler of India appointed by Prime Minister and key cabinet position - important to the empire. Reports to Parliament and Prime Minister and governs India Council in UK and leader of Viceroys.
Viceroy
Appointed by and reports to secretary of state and in charge of India
real ruler of India as based in India and enrolled for five years
served by India Civil Services Service some of which were wealthy educated Indians
power goes from Viceroy to town level
Worked from Delhi and advised by Council of India in London
Answerable to Parliament
Role of Indian civil service
served viceroy pyramid power from the Crown to town level
Essentially running India on behalf of the British
Ensured British laws were implemented
Some Indians able to work for them after 1919 or as lawyers or soldiers
Why was it a bad idea to form the British Raj?
Parliament in Britain meant it was difficult to and ascertain what was going on
they saw an opportunity and ran with it, making the Raj fragile with little thought going into it
Why was it a good idea to form the British Raj?
East India Company had bad reputation and the government had a better reputation, manipulating them via Democratic rule
preferred to be part of Raj as it gave them an autonomy
wealthy Indians could be educated in Britain, however they then discovered the negatives of the British Empire
Why was Queen Victoria's involvement important?
Becomes figurehead of India
links monarchy and Empire
binds India close to Britain
Princely States
states ran by Maharajas under favourable treaties, which helped Britain to main control maintain control with little effort themselves, e.g. Kashmir. 35% of the country with 14million people
INC
Founded in 1885 by primarily high cast Hindus that were starting to question British rule
Could all speak English and most were educated in England and lawyers two two Muslims attended in 1885 by 1888 eighty three out of six 100 were Muslim: Inclusive, not exclusive
Early resolutions framed around cooperation with the Raj but wanted some say in running the country some delegates favoured equal power share
INC’s first congress
Met for two days proclaiming loyalty to British crown and Raj dissatisfaction in how Raj was governing India
demands included: broadened basis of Gov, ICS open to Indians, opportunities to serve on government councils, wealth spent on infrastructure and the end of council in Whitehall
Muslim League
Formed in 1906 by Muslims uncomfortable under the INC umbrella
it was exclusive not inclusive voice for Muslim communities with minority political rights - wasn't problem if elites ruled for the people
opposed democracy as change means few Muslims elected in government and voice wouldn't be heard in political decision making
more politicised, so people realise differences between Hindus and Muslims
Britain receptive to its appeal this ruined negotiations between Britain and I N C, leading to partition and creating creation of Pakistan
Hindu Caste system
Class system based on religion and culture, with little social mobility
Hindus proportion
70% and primarily in East India, central and southern states, with a religious divide in Hyderabad
How did the British Raj anger Hindus?
Indian mute in a with gun grease with pork fat
they got rid of traditional practises such as making sati illegal, undermining their spiritual beliefs
Differences between Islam and Hinduism
Muslims are monothiests and believe in one God Allah and prophets such as Muhammad and Jesus
more deeply religious
Where was the Muslim population more concentrated?
West India, Bengal and divide in Hyderabad
How did the British Raj anger Muslims?
Ended the partition of Bengal in 1911
british victory in World War One deposed Sultan of Turkey and the leader of the Ottoman Empire, the spiritual leader of Islam at the time
GOIA (1858)
Creation of British Raj, closing EIC in reaction to Indian mutiny, meaning that meaning India was now run by the government
Partition of Bengal (1905)
viceroy Curzon partitioned Bengal to curb rise in nationalism
separated primarily Muslim E from Hindu W
Hindus outraged as it was another example of Raj adopting divided rule policies
lots of discontent led to the reunition of Bengal by Viceroy Harding G ending partition in 1911
led Muslim league to change its stance towards Britain
in 1913 a new group of leaders in the Muslim league to bridge gulf between Muslims and Indians
Indian Councils Act (1909)
Two parties: conservative Prime Imperial no say in government; liberal more receptive to INC demands
Liberals won election in 1906 introducing measures to support working class
proactive policy in response to INC demands
series of reforms are agreed by Lord John Morley and Viceroy Lord Minto: Sixty Indian representatives elected to serve on viceroy's executive council; 27 from territorial constituencies and interest groups
British officials still majority and provincial councils enlarged to create non-official majorities
Morley appointed two Indians to his London group and Minter appointed Sinha, Advocate General of Bengal to his body of advisers
separate electorates for Muslims and Hindus to allow minority Muslims to have avoids voice divide and rule.
How many Indian soldiers fought in World War one?
1.5 million with 60K fatalities
Sikh soldiers deemed most loyal in both world wars one and two
Gurkhas in World War Two from Tibet and China
lots of Muslims and Hindus fought
Why was India important to Britain during the war?
1.5 million Britons Indians served British Empire with 60,000 fatalities. Natural Resources Exploited and food stores as part of the British War effort.
why did India maintain loyalty to the British Empire and supported it?
Morley - Minto Act left nationalists quiet and start of independence
British Empire could protect them if there were any threats
lack of education meant it wasn't thought through
soldiers signed up to do their bit
promises of freedom and autonomy such as the Montagu declaration
Impact of war on India
Rise in nationalism despite loyalty during WW1
affected Indian economy significantly
war effort meant many educated Indians believe they deserved a reward
spanish flu consumed India due to or medical care killing ten to twenty million people
Why were some Indians discontent about their involvement in the war?
Complicated and they believe they deserved a reward for loyalty such as Dominion's status
not turning point in relations with Raj
muslims and Hindus joined forces against Raj
dethroning of the sultan of Turkey
resources taken away so felt exploited
fought in irrelevant war
Home rule Leagues
Two nationalist organisations established in 1916
One started by Bal Tilak, the leader of the INC who was released from prison in West India
Other by famous Fabian activist Annie Besant
they used newspapers rallies preachers and songs to spread nationalism
60,000 joined within a year
banned from British provinces and students banned from meetings
Besant locked up in 1917 by Raj authorities.
Tilak’s had 32000 members
Jinnah joined Besant’s in 1917
Home rule focused on domestic affairs.
Bal Tilak
Father of Indian unrest, as he was the awakener of India and therefore very radical
Gandhi was somewhat inspired by him, although he used terrorist methods to spread nationalism
one man’s revolutionary is another man's freedom fighter
many arrests attempts to arrest him
Main signatories of the Lucknow pact
Mohandas Gandhi who joined the INCin 1914 and became leader in 1920
Mohammed Ali Jinnah member of INC who joined the Muslim league in 1913 and later became leader
Bal Tilak, leader of INC in 1916
unique collaboration between nationalists
Main terms of the Lucknow Pact
Fix proportion of seats in Parliament
extra seats in areas with a minority congress
welcomed Muslim voices, uniting Hindus and Muslims in self government and role to play in policy
50% of seats for Muslims in the Puniab
How did the Lucknow put pressure on the British?
Joined hands with Congress
unification with one purpose and also home ruling, United Nationalist force
already at war, with the Battle of the Somme
key message of the Montagu declaration
Compromise granting some form of self government in light of India's contribution to World War one. Montagu promised to visit India to consider ideas from representative bodies, with the desire for democracy as well as dismantling the Raj.
Indians’ interpretation of the declaration
Achieved what they want internationally believe they will achieve dominion status
not ready for independence if they give into India what happens to other British colonies
form of appeasement
Timing of declararion
Around the I'm of the Battle of Passchendaele therefore appeased Indians at a time when many were being killed in the war presenting a form of appeasement
What were the Rowlatt Acts?
March 1919
Extension of DOIA only in provinces of Bengal Bombay and Punjab, isolating them as centres of revolutionary activity
Recommended old wartime controls
Stated Indians suspected revolutionary activity could be: imprisoned without trial, held indefinitely and convicted by court without jury, as well as no large government gatherings in public places
investigated by Rowlatt, Scottish judge
Why did Britain incorporate the acts?
Global recession and Spanish flu had killed 13 million
Crop failure and famine exacerbated situation, causing riots and unrest
Worried about unrest and civil disobedience in Punjab Bombay and Bengal
caused more harm than good as it caused more riots than it suppressed
Response to Rowlatt acts?
Leading Indians on Legislative Council such as Jinnah resigned
Fierce opposition in Punjab, esp. Amritsar, loss of control
Hartals from 30th March to 4th April 1919, Displaying solidarity
The rest of two organisers caused riots and three Europeans killed
british doctor Sherwood brutally beaten and saved from death by Hindus
Many felt betrayed especially after the Montagu declaration
Amritsar
Administrative capital of the Punjab, one of the provinces under the Rowlatt Acts
holy city with extravagant Sikh and Hindu temples
holy Festival when it took place on the 13th of April 1919
What happened in Amritsar 30.3.19-06.04.19
Hartals took place showing Hindu-Muslim solidarity
three Europeans killed
Britain had lost control over Amritsar
Why did violence erupt in Amritsar?
In breach of Rowlett acts as no large gatherings allowed
Dyer saw that he should end this
governor of Punjab O Dwyer believed rioting their part of coordinated uprising that may become mutiny so sent troops him
Dyer ordered proclamations around Amritsar warning against meetings and creating curfew
five to 20,000 gathered in Jallianwalla Bagh
troops opened fire killing 379 and 1500 casualties
Response of the Governor of the Punjab
Send Dyer in with troops to and rioting and did not condemn his actions
aftermath
Martial law passed to maintain control in Amritsar and many areas of Punjab
Turned thousands of loyal Indians against the Raj- revealed true face of GB rule
curfews, people arrested, travel restricted and further repression
Why was martial law declared quickly
Amritsar likely to Trigger problems elsewhere and there were concerns about Indian reaction
maintain control
Crawling Order
Forced any Indians who wanted to walk down where Sherwood had been beaten to crawl down on all fours
What was Dyer attempting to do with his actions?
Punish Indians for their response to Amritsar
deflect responsibility and tension by showing violent nature of Indians
deal with situation
set precedent that Indians cannot rebel
Findings of the Hunter Commission
Flamed Dyer for not warning before opening fire and said he'd committed a grave error for firing so long
desire to produce moral effect
mistaken conception of duty and therefore not his responsibility
Main aspects of GOIA (1919)
1858: Created Raj due to I.Mutiny
1909: Indian Councils Gave power to Indians by allowing them in viceroys council and separate electorates to give muslims a voice
1915: DOIA Granted executive powers during wartime repression
1917: Montagu dec.
1919: Rowlatt acts extended D O I A in certain provinces - INC rejected Montagu Chelmsford reforms and boycotted first1919 elections
British control under Dyarchy
50%of affairs at prov. level
foreign affairs
police, law and order to maintain control
taxes and collecting them as well as the national economy
defence and armed forces as India could stage coup
Indian power under Dyarchy
Councillors elected by franchise who have a saying on how it's run. 50% of control at provincial level, including
local affairs, such as education, agriculture and energy
what provinces spend taxes
Positives of dyarchy
Keep eye on Indian politicians
gave Indians more of a say with a larger electorate
no other colony and empire has dyarchy meaning preferential treatment
at least they're getting something of it
gave them autonomy even though they're not ready to run the country
Negatives of dyarchy
Didn't get Dominion status
feel betrayed fuelling nationalism and unrest
British and viceroy still in power
Jinnah
Bombay-based Barrister
Worked towards rapprochement of INC and ML towards self-government
Disliked separate electorates
Led ML towards signing Lucknow Pact