1/139
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
social responsibility
“a business’ obligation to pursue policies, make decisions, and take actions that benefit society” (85)
legal responsibility
duty/obligation to follow laws and regulations
ethical responsibility
= follow principles of right and wrong when conducting business
economic responsibility
to make a profit by producing a valued good or service
social responsiveness
reactive
defensive
accommodative
proactive
social responsiveness = “strategy to respond to stakeholders’ economic, legal, ethical, or discretionary expectations concerning social responsibility” (89)
reactive strategy = does less than society expects
defensive strategy = admits fault/responsibility, does minimum required to meet expectations
accommodative strategy = accepts responsibility, does everything expected to resolve issues
proactive strategy = anticipates problems and does more than expected to address them
discretionary responsibilities
“the social roles that a company fulfils beyond its economic, legal and ethical responsibilities” (88)
organisation’s obligation — shareholders and stakeholders
organisations obligation = “pursue policies, make decisions, take actions that benefit society” (slides) → shareholder vs stakeholder model
shareholder = financial investment in the firm
stakeholder = any legitimate interest in the firm
direct/regular financial relationship between stakeholder and company → primary stakeholder
shareholder model
shareholder model = “a view of social responsibility that holds that an organization’s overriding goal should be profit maximization for the benefit of shareholders” (85)
accredited to Milton Friedman
stakeholder model
primary
secondary
stakeholder model = “a theory of corporate responsibility that holds that management’s most important responsibility, long-term survival, is achieved by satisfying the interests of multiple corporate stakeholders” (85)
stakeholders = “persons or groups with a stake, legitimate interest, in a company’s actions” (85)
primary stakeholders = those who the company depends on eg employees, suppliers, customers etc
secondary stakeholders = can influence or be influenced by the company eg media, special interest groups
organisations would not survive without their primary stakeholders BUT secondary stakeholders are still important — reputation
UN 3 pillars of sustainability
environmental sustainability = preservation of natural resources, access to safe drinking water
social sustainability = “improvement of daily life for the greatest number of people through improving fair income distribution; promoting gender equality; ensuring equal access to land ownership, employment and education; investing in basic health and education; and enlisting the participation of beneficiaries” (537)
economic sustainability = current outcomes which foster long-term economic development
sustainability
ability of current generations to meet today’s needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet future needs
a business must meet all pillars to be truly sustainable
CSR
“how businesses and institutions address environmental, social and economic sustainability” → self regulation
Mauri model of sustainability
Mauri model of sustainability (kaitiakitanga) has four dimensions
environmental wellbeing (taiao mauri)
cultural wellbeing (hapū mauri)
social wellbeing (community mauri)
economic wellbeing (whanau mauri)
Mauri-o-meter = assessment of the impact of policies on mauri
utilitarianism
Most good for the most people
Founded by John Stuart Mill
Is results oriented but can we accurately predict future outcomes?
individualism
Act to achieve self interests
Can lead to misbehaviour ← motivated by greed
For businesses: can lead to an exclusive focus on profit → not meeting social obligations
justice view
types of justice
Fair treatment based on laws and other standards
How equitable a decision is for workplace justice?
Procedural justice = fair enforcement of rules
Distributive justice = equity based on individual characteristics eg ensuring men and women are paid the same
Interactional justice = treating all with respect, dignity
Commutative justice = fairness in exchanges, ensuring access to equal information
moral rights view
Uphold fundamental human rights – refer to UDHR
John Locke: all have right to fair treatment, liberty, life
cultural relativism
ethical behaviour is determined by culture
moral absolutism
there are absolute truths for ethics
ethical dilemma
course of action required, decision must be made between options which may involve ethical transgressions
ways people justify unethical behaviour
Not illegal
Everyone’s best interests - look beyond ends justify the means
No one will know - still wrong if not discovered
Organisation will support - expectation that company is more loyal than it may actually be
Lawrence Kohlberg: Levels of ethical decision making
Preconventional level = self centred, follows instructions
Conventional level = decisions based on social norms, meeting obligations and expectations
Postconventional/principled level = acts on principles and beliefs
types of managers re ethics
Manager to act as role models, set moral tone for the organisation eg having confidential reporting processes
Immoral manager = chooses to act unethically
Amoral manager = not aware of ethics
Moral manager = acts on strong ethical framework
triple bottom line
measures organisation based on financial, social and environmental results
3Ps of organisation performance
profit, people, planet
ethics and values
ethics = “code of moral principles that sets standards of good or bad, or right or wrong, in a person’s conduct”
values = broad beliefs of how we should act
impacts on what managers consider ethical
manager as a person — family/religion/personal standards etc
employing organisation — policies, codes of conduct, organisational culture, behaviour of supervisors and peers
external environment — government regulations, societal normal, ethical climate of the industry
koru of Māori ethics
group, work team, group formation
group = common objectives, continual interaction
work team = different skills, common mission, task-oriented
group formation and development
official and assigned groups vs unofficial and emergent groups
diversity within groups can improve performance
mature groups are able to work together better
Tuckman’s five stages of group formation and development
Forming = not much agreement, unclear direction
Storming = power struggles, more clarity of purpose, conflict
Norming = consensus, clear roles, facilitation
Performing = clear vision, delegation, achieving goals
Adjourning = tasks are complete, recognition
proposed additional stage = reforming ie going back to the beginning after a change
Gersick’s punctuated equilibrium model
groups do not make progress in a linear way INSTEAD they have periods of stagnation with little progress followed by bursts of productivity
characteristics of a mature group or team
clear purpose and mission
well-understood norms and standards of conduct
leads to team altruism
high level of group cohesion
influenced by time, size, prestige, external pressure, internal competition
flexible status structure
status structure = how authority and tasks are distributed in the group
task and maintenance functions
task functions = activities which contribute to completion of work eg identifying and finding solutions to problems
maintenance functions = activities necessary for the group to continue working together well
maintaining interpersonal relationships → communication
benefits of work teams
complicated tasks require teamwork, variety of skills and knowledge
empowers workforce more than command and control style
individual benefits of socialisation, connection and involvement
psychological intimacy = emotional closeness to colleagues
integrated involvement = closeness due to the process of completing the work
four aspects of group behaviour
norms of behaviour = implicitly or explicitly inform how members act
morality norms matter more than competence norms
performance norms are most relevant in the firm’s view
group cohesion = interpersonal component holding the group together
higher job satisfaction → higher productivity
better teamwork skills
social loafing = one member relies on other members instead of making equal contributions
ie free riding = rational because its hard to observe individual efforts
decrease the group’s overall performance
counter though a self-evaluation system, dividing tasks more strictly
loss of individuality = loss of self awareness, accountability for individual behaviour
behaviour of workers worsens
loss of ego can be positive for teamwork
factors that influence group effectiveness
work team structure = goals, objectives, operating guidelines, measures for success ie how the team goes about doing the work
work team process = managing cooperative and competitive behaviours
cooperative: open communication, integrity, positive interdependence, mutual support
competitive: fair play, reward structures
diversity
roles of contributor (of information), collaborator, communicator and challenger, interrogator styles
structural diversity = structural holes, disconnection between team members → improved by diversity
more structural holes can allow for more creativity while few allows for efficiency
creativity
empowerment and teams
organisational culture empowers teams ← especially when they are self managed or remote
empowerment skills: competence skills, process skills, cooperative and helping behaviours, communication skills
allowing teams to self manage increases empowerment BUT managers still provide leadership and influence
upper echelon theory
upper echelon = the top management team (TMT)
upper echelon theory: backgrounds of the TMT inform organisational values and culture
TMT’s experiences influence their reactions and decisions
TMT has power over whole organisation so is highly influential
role of diversity in teams
diversity, presence of a devil’s advocate in the TMT can maintain high performance for longer
diversity can increase uncertainty, complexity and miscommunication BUT provides more ideas so benefits organisations
organisational culture
guiding beliefs shared by all within an organisation
4 types of organisational culture
clan culture = internal focus, flexible values, lots of collaboration, less control and stability
adhocracy culture = external focus, values flexibility, risk taking, constant change
hierarchy culture = internal focus, values stability and control → formal and efficient
market culture = external focus, values stability and control — importance of the external environment
three levels of organisational culture
observable artefacts = physical signs of culture eg manner of dress, awards, behaviour
espoused values = what is explicitly stated by the organisation
enacted values = what actually happens
basic assumptions = the beliefs of workers regarding the organisation, not observable
how employees learn culture
symbols = object/act/quality/event used to convey meaning
stories = repeated narrative to emphasise a value
heroes = somebody who embodies the organisation and its values
rites and rituals = activities/ceremonies which celebrate the organisation at particular milestones
importance of organisational culture
collective identity
collective commitment
social stability
shapes behaviour (when employees make sense of their surrounding environment)
3 views on enhancing economic performance (profit and competitiveness)
strength perspective = an organisational culture’s strength is based on the organisation’s long-term financial performance
strong culture = everyone buys into the values → more motivation → better performance
weak culture = values forced on people
weakness: success makes managers less likely to consider change
fit perspective = success happens when culture fits context
better fit → better economic performance
adaptation perspective = best cultures help organisations predict and adjust to changes in their environment
adaptability → better economic performance
process of cultural change
formal statements eg mission statement
slogans and sayings
stories, legends, myths
how leaders react to crises — sets tone for appropriate behaviour, how flexible values are
role modelling, training, coaching
physical design eg cubicle vs open plan office
rewards, titles, promotions, bonuses
organisational goals and performance criteria — challenging goals will encourage high performance
measurable and controllable activities — tracking how well goals are being met
organisational systems and procedures eg working remotely
organisation
organisational structure
organisation chart
organisation = two or more people consciously coordinating activities
organisational structure = formal system for coordination involving who people report to and receive tasks from
shown by an organisation chart
vertical hierarchy = looking up and down shows who reports to whom
horizontal specialisation = looking side to side shows how areas of work are divided
common elements of organisations
common purpose → unity
coordinated effort ← acting on common purpose
division of labour ← specialisation → greater efficiency
hierarchy of authority (chain of command) → makes sure the right employee does the right work at the right time
span of control
narrow/tall = less people
wide/flat = more people
depends on amount of hands on supervision required
flat organisation = few levels with wide spans of control
for efficiency: spans of control as wide as possible ← more action, less communication
authority, responsibility, delegation
authority = rights inherent to a manager’s positions
accountability = reporting back and having responsibility
responsibility = obligation to complete tasks
delegation = assigning tasks to others
line position = managers make decisions and have people reporting to them
staff position = staff personnel provide line managers with advice/recommendations/research
centralised vs decentralised authority
centralised = important decisions made by higher level managers
decentralised = important decisions made by middle-level and supervisory managers
organisational design
aims to design optimal structures (accountability and responsibility) to execute strategies
4 main organisational structures (diagram)
simple structure
small firms
authority in one person, flat hierarchy, little specialisation, not many rules
functional structure
divided by specialties
very commonplace
divisional structure
divided by purpose
small groups made of people with a wide range of specialties
based on same/similar products/services/customers/clients/regions
matrix structure
grid for chains of command (functional, divisional)
two structures shown by vertical and horizontal
horizontal design
alternative: horizontal design = work on shared tasks, group members have different specialties ie diagonal lines
teams more likely to be temporary
seeks to improve collaboration
breaks down internal barriers
boundaryless organisation
members connect online, collaborate on common tasks, a lot of contracting out
hollow structure (network structure) = central core makes decisions, main functions contracted out (cheaper/faster)
outsources processes
can also have different contractors in different countries — tax systems, labour laws etc
modular structure = firms obtain aspects of products from other firms ie some of the production is outsourced
outsources product
virtual structure = internet based collaboration for short term work, responds to exceptional market opportunities which are temporary
internet lowers (eliminates communication costs)
allows for quick responses → increases the amount of opportunities that can be realised
contingency design
making the organisation best fit its environment
4 factors to consider when designing an organisation
environment — mechanistic or organic
mechanistic = centralised authority, specific rules, close supervision, specialised tasks
organic = decentralised authority, few rules, shared tasks, respond quickly to unexpected tasks → adhocracies
environment — differentiation or integration
differentiation = parts of the organisation disperse and fragment ← due to specialisation and division of labour — efficiency, EoS trade off
integration = tendency of parts to come together ← due to a common purpose
stage in the life cycle of an organisation
birth stage = non-bureaucratic, few rules, few support staff
youth stage = pre-bureaucratic, growth and expansion, more support staff
midlife stage = bureaucratic, growth turns to stability, many rules, formalised structure
maturity stage = very bureaucratic, large, mechanistic, danger = lack of adaptability and innovation
link between strategy and structure
structure should achieve goals ← strategy informs goals
resilience
ability to adapt to difficult experiences
mental, emotional, behavioural changes
develops when people can meet demands
low resilience → fight/flight/freeze/fawn
different levels of resilience → different responses to same working conditions
resilience = capacity - load
managers can impact capacity and load → resources, delegation, prioritisation, realistic expectations
covid fatigue
values
terminal
instrumental
convictions which determine an ideal way of being or means to achieve that way, preferable to the opposite way
tend to be relatively stable, can reflect personality, upbringing, identity
terminal values = describe preferred end state
instrumental values = ways of acting which help achieve terminal values
value system
individual ranking of values based on their personal significance
personality-job fit theory
match between personality type (1 of 6) and the job decides how much people like their job and how long they remain in it
person-organisation fit theory
people and organisations need to have similar values
importance of online image showing this so that right people apply
Hofstede’s framework for assessing cultures = 5 characteristics of cultures
power distance — how much power is accepted and unequally distributed
high power distance = unequal distribution which is widely accepted
individualism versus collectivism — whether people prefer to act alone or as groups
masculinity vs femininity
high masculinity rating = distinct gender roles, favours masculine attributes eg control
high femininity rating = equality between genders
uncertainty avoidance — how much a society tries to escape ambiguous and uncertain situations
long term vs short term orientation
implication: managers to consider values and personality when recruiting
components of moral compass
values, convictions, ethical principles, religious beliefs, personal goals, self-related beliefs as well as behavioural scripts, societal laws, organizational rules such as school and work, and family behaviours.
sum of our experiences to date
whanaungatanga
collectivism, sense of belonging
getting to know each other at work
overall strength of the team
manaakitanga
caring for others’ mana, hospitality, integrity
acknowledging who and where stakeholders come from
kindness, coaching, active listening, walking the talk
rangatiratanga
leadership, governance, self-determination
authority in an organisation
guardian stance toward resources used
providing staff agency when they do their work
kaitiakitanga
guard taonga, includes sustainability, interconnectedness with environment
long term perspectives
environmental awareness
taking care of and building future generations’ assets
Māori values in business
need to balance profit with stakeholder aspirations → achieve what Māori value ← derived from tikanga
tikanga in business context more fluid than formal/marae context
more trust from better interpersonal relationships
walking the talk in workplace = following tikanga → shows integrity
whanaungatanga chooses collectivism over individualism
manaakitanga: “On the marae it is demonstrated through each stage of the pōwhiri process - karanga, whaikōreo, hongi, hariru and kai.”
arikitanga = highest mana/power
importance of values in an organisation
individuals won’t necessarily buy in to an organisation’s values → organisations need to ensure individuals can express their values within the organisation’s values → connects individuals to the organisation more
wairuatanga
spiritual well being
holistic view of a person
consider mihi whakatau, karakia
mōhiotanga
sharing knowledge
māramatanga
understanding
clarifying rules, procedures, tasks
tuakāna/tēina
older/younger relationships
mentorships
tikanga
what is correct
establishing rules and boundaries
reward adherence
hākari
celebratory feast
atuatanga
paying respect to the gods
mauri
life force, uniqueness
treating everything with respect
diversity and factors increasing it
longer working life → more generational diversity AND more social change → greater differences between generations
boomers working longer → harder for gen x to get promotions
more migration → more cultural diversity
most likely to be in service industries eg food preparation, maintenance, cleaning
diversity = all the ways which make people different from one another
workforce diversity = workers have a broad range of qualities
diversity of perspective
diversity of perspective = heterogenous team, members have different backgrounds and skills
inclusion
inclusion = how much a team member feels valued and appreciated for their uniqueness
benefits of workplace diversity
better use of employee talent
better understanding of marketplace — employees reflect more customer segments
more breadth of understanding in leadership positions ← no longer myopic
greater quality of problem solving ← more perspectives
less turnover → less associated costs
prejudice
viewing differences as deficiencies
discrimination
prejudice acted on, someone treated inequitably
stereotypes
beliefs associated with particular groups, often negative, assume all group members have the same characteristics
stereotype threat
shaken confidence as stereotypes about your group say you won’t succeed in said task
ethnocentrism
one’s group is superior to others
monoculture
only one way of doing things and one set of values is accepted
ethnorelativism
all groups are equal
pluralism
environment accommodates various groups
glass ceiling
unseen obstacle preventing women and minorities from achieving top management positions → ways for women/minorities to overcome (really??)
profit and loss experience (ie technical skills)
assertiveness
risk-taking
highlight achievements
opt out trend
voluntarily leaving the workforce — but how voluntary??
getting passed over for promotions → demotivation → leave workforce
Fortune survey of 103 women leaving executive jobs: main reason = corporate culture
female advantage
idea that women are more successful in leadership roles
women on average are more educated
better interpersonal skills ← which have become increasingly necessary
“research has found a correlation between balanced gender composition in companies…and higher organisational performance” p533
role of globalisation re diversity
expatriates = those who live/work outside their own country
MNCs: have to manage multiple cultures, learn norms in different countries
cultural competence + cycle
effectively interacting with those in different cultures
Uncover diversity problems
Strengthen top management commitment
Choose solutions to fit a balanced strategy
Demand results and revisit goals
Maintain momentum to change the culture → back to step 1
step 2: top management sets tone for whole organisation, allocate time and money to improving cultural competence
step 3: factors to address education, enforcement and exposure
step 4: likely to require qualitative and quantitative measures
Responses to (improving/fostering) diversity
enhancing structures and policies
about 60% of fortune 500 companies have chief diversity officers
expanding recruitment efforts
targeted internship offers
affiliations with minority organisations
relationships with schools
establishing mentor relationships
increasing awareness of sexual harassment
using multicultural teams
good responses → better culture → more sustainable
employees value proactive approach ← seems more genuine