Psychological Assessment, Reliability, and Validity

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/34

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering psychological assessment methods, reviews, reliability theory, and various forms of validity evidence according to lecture notes.

Last updated 6:38 AM on 6/23/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

35 Terms

1
New cards

Psychological assessment

A systematic process that uses a combination of techniques and methods to evaluate various psychological and behaviour characteristics of an individual or group of individuals.

2
New cards

Narrative review

A review where an expert subjectively decides which studies should be included and how they should be weighted, focusing on qualitative descriptions of prior results.

3
New cards

Systematic review

A review that attempts to collate all empirical evidence fitting pre-specified eligibility criteria using transparent, predefined search strategies.

4
New cards

Meta Analysis

The statistical analysis of a large collection of results from individual studies for the purpose of integrating the findings into a summary estimate of the true effect.

5
New cards

Risk ratio (Relative risk)

The probability of an outcome in the exposed group divided by the risk of the outcome in the unexposed group; a risk ratio <1< 1 means lower risk in the exposed group.

6
New cards

The file drawer problem

A criticism of meta-analysis suggesting that the omission of unpublished studies with null results may invalidate the findings.

7
New cards

Reliability

The property of consistency in measurement; a test is reliable if it yields stable and consistent results.

8
New cards

Classical test theory formula

xi=τ+ϵix_i = \tau + \epsilon_i, where xix_i is the observed score, τ\tau is the true score, and ϵi\epsilon_i is the error component.

9
New cards

Test-retest reliability

A method of estimating reliability by obtaining and correlating scores from an original test and a retest occasion.

10
New cards

Carryover effects

Problems in reliability testing where participants remember previous answers or change behavior due to having taken the test before.

11
New cards

Alternate-forms reliability

A reliability estimate obtained by correlating scores from two different but parallel forms of the same test.

12
New cards

Split-half reliability

An estimate of reliability obtained by splitting a test into two parallel subtests and calculating the correlation between them.

13
New cards

Cronbach’s α\alpha

A reliability measure thought of as averaging across all possible split-half estimates after adjusting them to reflect the full length of the test.

14
New cards

Standard error of measurement (SEmSE_m)

A value that quantifies the typical size of measurement error in test-score units, defined as SEm=σx1rxxSE_m = \sigma_x\sqrt{1 - r_{xx}}.

15
New cards

Diattenuation formula

A formula used to estimate the correlation between constructs if they were measured without error, correcting for the fact that measurement error makes observed correlations smaller.

16
New cards

Nunnally & Bernstein benchmark

The standard benchmark for reliability, defined as rxx=0.9r_{xx}' = 0.9.

17
New cards

Validity

The degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores for proposed uses of tests.

18
New cards

Criterion validity

The extent to which a test can predict scores on relevant criterion variables, calculated via correlation between test scores and criterion scores.

19
New cards

Concurrent validity

A type of criterion validity where test scores are evaluated against a criterion measured at the same time as the test.

20
New cards

Predictive validity

A type of criterion validity where test scores are evaluated against a criterion measured at a later date.

21
New cards

Content validity

The extent to which a test's content adequately covers the full domain of the construct it is assessing.

22
New cards

Face validity

The extent to which a test seems to non-experts (such as test takers) to have content validity.

23
New cards

Lawshe (1975)’s Content Validity Ratio (CVR)

CVR=ne(N2)(N2)CVR = \frac{n_e - (\frac{N}{2})}{(\frac{N}{2})}, where nen_e is the number of experts responding 'essential' and NN is the total number of experts.

24
New cards

Construct validity

The extent to which a test measures the specific construct it is intended to measure, involving convergent and discriminant validity.

25
New cards

Convergent validity

Evidence showing that test scores are strongly correlated with tests of related constructs.

26
New cards

Discriminant validity

Evidence showing that test scores are not strongly correlated with tests of unrelated constructs.

27
New cards

Sensitivity

A test's ability to correctly detect positive cases, calculated as truepositivestruepositives+falsenegatives\frac{true\,positives}{true\,positives + false\,negatives}.

28
New cards

Specificity

A test's ability to correctly detect negative cases, calculated as truenegativestruenegatives+falsepositives\frac{true\,negatives}{true\,negatives + false\,positives}.

29
New cards

Positive predictive power (PPP)

The probability that a positive test result indicates a true positive case, calculated as truepositivestruepositives+falsepositives\frac{true\,positives}{true\,positives + false\,positives}.

30
New cards

Prevalence

The probability that a random case is criterion positive, calculated as the sum of true positives and false negatives divided by the total number of cases.

31
New cards

Nomological networks

An interlocking system of laws that relate observed variables to each other, to theoretical constructs, and theoretical constructs to each other (Cronbach & Meehl, 1995).

32
New cards

Multitrait-multimethod matrices

A method proposed by Campbell & Fiske (1959) to evaluate convergent and discriminant validity by assessing trait variance and method variance.

33
New cards

Trait variance

Score variance attributable to the underlying trait being measured.

34
New cards

Method variance

Score variance attributable to the specific measurement method used.

35
New cards

The 'hard test' of construct validity

A success pattern where monotrait-heteromethod correlations are greater than heterotrait-monomethod correlations, suggesting trait variance outweighs method variance.