Critical Thinking: Reason and Evidence - D265 WGU

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 2 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/47

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards for this course in WGU

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

48 Terms

1
New cards

Critical thinking 5 steps

Being curious and thinking creatively

Separating the thinker from the position

Knowing oneself enough to avoid biases and errors of thought

Having intellectual honesty, humility, and charity

Understanding arguments, reasons, and evidence

2
New cards

Propositions

Statements that are true or false.

3
New cards

Non-propositions

Sentences that are not statements about matters of fact (or fiction). They do not make a claim that can be true or false.

4
New cards

Simple propositions

These have no internal logical structure, meaning they are true or false on their own.

5
New cards

Complex propositions

Has internal logical structure, meaning they are composed of simple propositions.

6
New cards

What are conclusion indicators?

  • Therefore

  • So

  • It follows that

  • Hence

  • Thus

  • Entails that

  • We may conclude that

  • Implies that

  • Wherefore

  • As a result

7
New cards

What are premise indicators?

  • Because

  • For

  • Given that

  • In that

  • As

  • Since

  • As indicated by

8
New cards

Premise

This claims, evidence, ideas, and so forth intended to support the conclusion.

9
New cards

Conclusions

This claims that the whole argument is intended to support or demonstrate or prove.

10
New cards

Deduction

  • arguments where the premises guarantee or necessitate the conclusion

— mathematical arguments, logical arguments, arguments from definition

11
New cards

Induction

  • arguments where the premises make the conclusion probable

— analogies, authority, causal inferences, scientific reasoning, extrapolations, etc.

12
New cards

Abduction

Arguments where the best available explanation is chosen as the correct explanation.

13
New cards

Truth

A true proposition accurately represents reality.

14
New cards

Validity

If the premises were true, the conclusion would necessarily have to be true also. This doesn't require that the same premises have to be true. Rather, it just means that if they were true, the conclusion would have to be true too.

15
New cards

Soundness

A deductive argument is sound if it has a valid structure and all its premises are true. (If an argument is deductive but has either an invalid structure or at least one false premise, then it is an unsound argument.)

16
New cards

Sound Argument

All True Premises + Valid Structure =

17
New cards

Truth v2

Propositions are true if they accurately represent what is the case, otherwise they are false.

18
New cards

Strength

In an inductive argument, the truth of the premises would make the conclusion probably true.

19
New cards

Cogency

This inductive argument is strong and all its premises are true. (If an argument is inductive but either is weak or has at least one false premise, then it is an uncogent argument.)

20
New cards

Cogent Argument

All True Premises + Strong Inductive Support

21
New cards

Formal Fallacy

This fallacy has a problem with their structure. Any argument that has the form of a formal fallacy is invalid.

22
New cards

Informal Fallacy

This fallacy has a problem with their content.

23
New cards

Cognitive Bias

The way we naturally categorize and make sense of the world around us.

24
New cards

Alief

An automatic belief-like attitude that can explain how our instinctual responses can conflict with our reasoned-out beliefs.

25
New cards

Heuristic

A rule of thumb, a ready strategy, or a shortcut.

26
New cards

Algorithm Bubble

The curated and personalized version of online reality that a website shows you when you log on.

27
New cards

Availability Heuristic

A process where in the mind generalizes based on what is available to it rather than on what is objectively true.

28
New cards

ad hominem fallacy

is committed when one attacks the person making an argument rather than the argument itself.

29
New cards

genetic fallacy

is committed when one argues that the origin of an idea is a reason for rejecting (or accepting) that idea.

30
New cards

straw figure fallacy

is committed when one misrepresents another’s argument then attacks the misrepresented (weaker) argument rather than the actual (stronger) argument.

31
New cards

red herring fallacy

is committed when one introduces an irrelevant topic.

32
New cards

appeal to authority fallacy

is committed when one appeals to an unqualified authority in support of one’s claim.

33
New cards
34
New cards

appeal to force fallacy

is committed when one uses a threat to compel agreement with one’s claim.

35
New cards

appeal to popularity fallacy

is committed when one appeals to the popularity of a belief as a reason to affirm its truth.

36
New cards

appeal to consequences fallacy

is committed when one appeals to the bad (or good) consequences of accepting a claim as a reason to reject (or accept) it as true.

37
New cards

fallacy of equivocation

is committed when one’s argument mistakenly uses the same word in two different senses.

38
New cards

appeal to ignorance fallacy

is committed when someone reasons from our lack of knowledge that a claim is false (or true) to the assertion the claim is true (or false).

39
New cards

slippery slope fallacy

is committed when someone argues, without sufficient reason, one event will lead to a series of events ultimately ending in some further (usually disastrous) event.

40
New cards

Texas Sharpshooter fallacy

is committed when one selectively uses, or “cherry-picks,” only the evidence supporting their desired conclusion.

41
New cards

post hoc fallacy

is committed when someone claims some event causes another just because the first event (the alleged cause) occurs before the second event (the alleged effect).

42
New cards

hasty generalization fallacy

is committed when someone generalizes too quickly about a group of people, things, or events.

43
New cards

level” or “layer

of an argument map is one horizontal row of a carefully drawn argument map.

44
New cards

Main Conclusion

 Final conclusion of the argument

45
New cards

Main Premise

One among the set of premises that directly support the main conclusion

46
New cards

Sub-Inference

An inference from a premise to another premise

47
New cards

sub-premise

A premise in a sub-inference

48
New cards

sub-conclusion

A conclusion in a sub-inference