1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
why government controls prices
usually for equity concerns —> think market outcome is not the FAIR outcome
need to protect/please buyers or sellers in a market
how does government control prices
imposing price controls which are legal restrictions on how high or low a market price may go
price ceilings
is the maximum price sellers are allowed to charge for a good/service
government is intervening to push prices down
if the price ceiling is above the equilibrium price
the price ceiling is non-binding and has no impact on the market
if the price ceiling is below the equilibrium price
at the price ceiling the quantity demanded is a lot higher than quantity supplied causing a shortage that cant go away
inefficiently low quantity (price ceiling)
causing DWL (missed opportunites for trade)
inefficiently low quality (price ceiling)
sellers cannot raise prices —> reduce quality/service
no incentive to maintain quality
ex. rent control —> poor living condtions
wasted resources (price ceiling)
wasted resources
people spend money, effort, and time to cope with shortages, opportunity cost of the time spent in lines, wages not earned, leisure time not ensure
black markets (price ceiling)
goods and services bought illegally
encourage disrespect for the law
winners and losers with a price ceiling
all producers are losing
some consumers benefit from lower prices
some consumers are worse off because they cant find goods (shortage)
price floors
the minimum price buyers are required to pay for a good or service
government pushing market prices up
what if the price floor is below the equilibrium price
the price floor is non-binding and has no impact on the market
what is the price floor is above the equilibrium price
the price floor is binding and quantity demanded is much higher than quantity supplied causing a surplus that cant go away (without gov. buying it)
price guarantee
the government will buy any remaining surplus
inefficient allocation of sales among producers (price floor)
allow high cost frims to operate
low cost sellers unable to make sales while high cost do
wasted resources (price floor)
non-price competition
government has to buy unwanted surpluses of agricultural products —> sometimes destroyed or thrown away
inefficiently high quality (price floor)
sellers offer goods at ineffiently high quality
quality is higher than buyers are willing to pay for —> would rather lower price
not efficient —> buyers not getting what they actually wanted
winners and losers of price floors
all consumers are losing —> paying higher price and receiving lower quantity
some producers benefit from higher prices
some producers lose —> unable to sell goods because of lower quantity
quota
is an upper limit on the quantity of some good that can be bought or sold —> imposed by government
quota limit
the totel amount of a good that can be legally transacted
if quota ls above equilibrium quantity
the quota is non-binding and market will follow the Eq
if quota is below equilibrium quantity
binding —> producers worse off, some producers better off
causes DWL
quota rent per good
the difference between the demand and supply price at the quota limit