1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
law, same as
Written constitution, statutes & common law
2 main reqs for functioning of courts
1- STATUTORY reqs
2- COMMON LAW reqs
4 statutory reqs
impartiality
fairness
openness
competent jurisdiction
impartiality
Court must be neutral, fair & independent
(Judges should not be biased and should follow the law)
Judges:
->neutral
->no outside infl
->must be fair
"not only justice must be done but seen to be done"
***There can never be a lawful decision by the courts if judges don't follow the law, comply w law, and interpret the law according to law
- If decision by court is a fair (just/impartial/independent/neutral) decision, it is a decision that follows the law
fairness
Justice (doing the right thing)
- Judges are obligated to follow the law
(can be no just decision if we don’t follow the law)
openness
Court must be open to public/always open to public
- No children allowed in court “juveniles”
- Must wear proper attire (dress well)
“regulations” = Tulafono faatonutonu
competent jurisdiction
right court must hear right case
“incompetent jurisdiction” = wrong court hearing wrong case
Anything to do w constitution, can't be done at district court -> supreme court
Divorce -> supreme court
Matai title & customary land -> land & titles court
"decision is not authorised"
Courts authorised by law & guided by law, must interpret according to law
4 common law reqs
rule against bias
fairness
openness
correct applic of law
rule against bias + significance
“natural justice” = rule of fair play
o Judge must commit to administer justice w/o fear/favour
Sig: must do the right thing
define intra, ultra & extra vires
“intra vires” = within powers (when decision is just)
“ultra vires” = outside powers
“extra vires" = beyond powers
(any decision reached in contravention of natural justice is deemed void & ultra vires)
maxim nemo judex causa sua
no man may be a judge in his own cause
audi alteram partem
Hear the other side
correct applic of law + function of judges
judges of courts must apply the laws correctly
Function of judges: interpret the law according to law. Decisions guided by law
“judges” (& magistrates) = aka adjudicators
Head & run the court
(& investigation & hearing/trial)
judges are judges of the LAW
assessors
in high profile case are judges of the FACTS
(& assist judge in making the decision)
^”facts of a case” = an account of what exactly happened
“office of AG” core function
Provide legal advice to PM & cabinet
(also prosecutes on behalf of police)
Lawyers from office of AG
“prosecutors”
(rep police & victims in criminal cases – supreme court)
hm info
“police” aka officers of the courts
“court stenographers” = office of court who keeps record/takes note of court proceedings
