Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) - Quick Study Flashcards

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/34

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary-style flashcards covering key concepts from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) lecture notes.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

35 Terms

1
New cards

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)

Integration of the best research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient values/context to guide clinical decisions.

2
New cards

Best research evidence

Highest quality research that informs practice (e.g., well-designed studies and credible findings).

3
New cards

Clinical expertise

The clinician’s skills, judgment, and experience used to interpret and apply evidence.

4
New cards

Patient values & context

Individual preferences, circumstances, and values that guide care decisions.

5
New cards

The 5 A’s of EBP

Ask, Acquire, Appraise, Apply, Assess — steps guiding evidence-based practice.

6
New cards

Ask

Formulate a clinical question (often using the PICO framework).

7
New cards

Acquire

Search for relevant evidence in databases and grey literature.

8
New cards

Appraise

Critically evaluate the quality and relevance of the evidence.

9
New cards

Apply

Implement findings in practice with input from the client.

10
New cards

Assess

Evaluate outcomes and the process of using the evidence in care.

11
New cards

PICO Framework

A structure for clinical questions: P = Patient/Problem, I = Intervention, C = Comparison, O = Outcome.

12
New cards

P (Patient/Problem)

The patient group or problem addressed by the question.

13
New cards

I (Intervention)

The treatment, exposure, or action being considered.

14
New cards

C (Comparison)

The alternative to the intervention (e.g., placebo, another therapy).

15
New cards

O (Outcome)

The result or endpoint of interest.

16
New cards

Levels of Evidence

A hierarchy of evidence quality, from high (RCTs, systematic reviews) to lower levels.

17
New cards

Traditional model

Evidence hierarchy where RCTs and systematic reviews are considered strongest.

18
New cards

RCTs

Randomized Controlled Trials; assess the effectiveness of an intervention.

19
New cards

Systematic reviews

Synthesis of multiple studies on a topic using a rigorous method.

20
New cards

Meta-analyses

Statistical synthesis of results from multiple studies.

21
New cards

OCEBM

Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels, ranging from Level 1 (highest) to Level 5 (lowest).

22
New cards

Tomlin Pyramid

A framework where Experimental, Descriptive, Qualitative, and Outcomes research are valued according to the question.

23
New cards

Experimental

Research focusing on cause-and-effect through controlled manipulation.

24
New cards

Descriptive

Research describing norms, patterns, and associations without experimental manipulation.

25
New cards

Qualitative

Research exploring experiences, meanings, and perspectives of participants.

26
New cards

Practice-based evidence

Data and insights gathered from real-world service delivery as evidence.

27
New cards

Critical Appraisal

Systematic evaluation of a study’s validity, results, and applicability.

28
New cards

Validity

The extent to which a study's design and execution accurately reflect the phenomenon.

29
New cards

Applicability

How well the study results generalize to a specific patient or context.

30
New cards

Searching the Literature

Systematic retrieval of relevant evidence from scholarly sources.

31
New cards

Databases

Digital collections of literature (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, PEDro).

32
New cards

Boolean operators

Logical connectors (AND, OR, NOT) used to refine searches.

33
New cards

MeSH terms

Medical Subject Headings; standardized indexing terms for articles.

34
New cards

Truncation

Using an asterisk (*) to search for word variants and roots.

35
New cards

Barriers to EBP

Common obstacles such as limited appraisal skills, time constraints, access; institutional/policy limits.