1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
when and who - the initial occupation of Western Europe
Homo erectus migrated to Western Europe by about 1.4 mya
first to leave Africa, have significant use of tools, and use of fire
lots of debate of what to label the species, differentiation?
earliest hominin fossils in western Europe are classified as
Homo erectus
Homo antecessor
Early Western European Sites - Sima del Elefante, Spain
this site contains some of the oldest hominin fossils in western Europe
partial hominin midface found in levels between 1.1 to 1.4mya - “first human face of Western Europe”
face resembles Homo erectus, but has been classified as Homo affinis erectus
name symbolizes the similarity, a branch of migrated erectus
site is well stratified
has also found a jaw, dated to 1.2mya, found above the previous
animal bones with marks, indicating hunting and tool use, was also found
Early Western European Sites - Gran Dolina, Spain
Homo antecessor fossils found, dated to 800,000yrs
little more complete, upper jaw, back of skull
1000ccm cranial capacity, low forehead, jut in back of skull
looks different than erectus and affinis, but these three are usually all clumped together with erectus
this site also has evidence of cannibalism, bones recovered have stone tool cut marks, bones smashed open for marrow
bones treated the same as animal bones, cut marks, disposal, breakage pattern - label it as cannibalism instead of a cultural practice
Homo heidelbergensis
dated to 600,000 to 400,000 yrs
well represented
many paleoanthropologists suggest its the ancestor of Neandertals (most direct ancestor) in Europe, modern humans in Africa, and another species in Asia
different branches of the same species
between modern and erectus
1100 to 1400ccm cranial capacity - within modern range
large midface region
large, arched brow ridges and a large, rounded occipital torus - erectus had an angular one
Sima de los Huesos - Pit of Bones
Homo heidelbergensis site in northern Spain
dated 430,000 yrs, and over 6500 fossils were found representing at least 28 individuals
was able to extracts DNA (incredible, rare) and was able to reconstruct genomes
DNA showed that they were very similar to Neandertral, linked them together
the environment was consistently moist and cool, which led to the protection and preservation of the DNA
can treat it like a crime scene - can actually use forensics
“First Murder Victim” - skull with stone tool marks in skull, cause of death
Schoningen, Germany
Homo heidelbergensis site - preserved wooden spears
several spears were found in association with stone tools and butchered remains of large animals
337,000 to 300,000 yrs dated
known as hunters
spruce wood, 6-7ft, sharpened ends, looked like modern day javelins
rapidly covered, glacial sediment, making an anaerobic environment, halts decomposition
butchered remains of animals - deer, wild cattle, wild horses - big game hunters
Boxgrove Site, England
Homo heidelbergensis site, dated to 524,000 to 420,000yrs
perforated horse scapula, shoulder blade, with a circular puncture wound indicates big game hunting with spears
an abundance of butchered animal bone and more than 100 finely made hand axes found
a tibia from site was identified as heidelbergensis
even found four butchered rhinoceros - cave bear, wild horses; different game compared to today
The earliest Genus Homo
emergence is marked by fossils dating back 2.8 million years
same time as other hominins
discovered in Ledi-Geraru, Ethiopia in 2015
a partial lower jaw was identified as the earliest member of the genus homo
not directly put into a species, not certain enough
Homo habilis
2.4 to 1.4mya
have larger brain, rounder skull - first one to show significant brain size increase
smaller teeth and jaws, parabolic arcade
less prognathic face, high vertical eye ridge
presence of material culture - artifacts found, tools
post cranially very similar to afarensis, likely that afarensis led to robustus and habilis, different branches
also could be called Homo rudolfensis - but is there really a difference or just differentiation in a species, remains found could indicate a male, not another genus
found in the same strata as stone tools, therefore categorized as a stone tool manufacturer - known as the first tool users, but it is debatable as there has been other signs but no artifacts found with hominin sites
Earliest Stone Tools
recent evidence suggests stone tools were used as early as 3.3 million years ago
500,000yrs before earliest homo - did other hominins make, or maybe the earliest homo has not been found yet
simple stone tools called Lomekwian tools - found in Kenya
simple tools, flakes, hitting together
no remains found with these tools, not possible to know who used
Oldowan Tools
found in Olduvai Gorge - 2.5mya
manufactured by Homo habilis
hammerstones, choppers, and flakes
manufactured by percussion flaking - used for hunting, cutting, getting to bone marrow
ability to produce tools indicated having forethought - planning ahead, tools have been transported - travel with tools; important development, utilizing a wider variety of resources
Olduvai Gorge - Tanzania
very important hominin site
great rift valley, lots of tectonic activity, rifting and erosion
sequence of about 2 million years exposed, well defined strata, volcanic activity
many artifacts found, homo erectus/habilis, Paranthropus boisei
Leakey family spent they whole life studying the area
Homo erectus
emerged 1.9mya - the first hominin to leave the African continent
indication of world traveling and/or migration
has a larger body and larger brain
unique skull - low, long cranium, big ridge on the back of skull (jutted out), huge ridge above eyes, less prognathic, smaller teeth and jaw, no chin
cranial capacity of 800-1200ccm - two thirds of modern human
Asian homo erectus - African and Georgian forms often classified as Homo ergaster - once again, it it differentiation
really start to look human like, first ones fully upright, lost arboreal adaptation
Homo erectus - African sites
oldest Homo erectus specimens here date to 1.9mya
very well represented in the fossil record, early as 1800 discovery
no longer ape-like sized, fully grown could be up to 6ft - 1000ccm cranial capacity
Turkana Boy, Kenya - most complete early hominin ever discovered, most post-cranium reserved (even ribs), has modern limb proportions
Homo erectus - Eastern Europe sites
Dmanisi, Georgia - earliest well dated hominin site outside of Africa
dated back to 1.8mya, early migration beyond Africa
significantly smaller, small brain capacity (600-775), more like habilis - but from skull study and shape it is classified as erectus
indicated they were early erectus, still small, and also has Oldowan tools
Homo erectus - Java, Indonesia
recovered by Eugene Dubois in 1891
reported as 1.6 to 1.75mya
originally classified as Pithecanthropus erectus “erect ape man” but later reclassified as Homo erectus
few stone tools, maybe they had tools made of other material that did not preserve
once again, fast movement after first appearance
note : they did not use watercraft to get to the islands, the water level was much lower back then, Indonesia was not an island yet
Homo erectus - China site
many fossils in China date to 800,000 to 200,000yrs
there is also evidence of fossils in Northern China as old as 1.66mya - fast movement '
“Peking Man”
fossils that got lost during WW2
Acheulean tool industry
Homo erectus manufactured
characterized by large oval or teardrop shaped hand axes
much more sophisticated, bifacial
digging, chopping, smashing open marrow, butchering - evidence of hunting along with scavenging
1.7mya - oldest tools, 1.4mya - much more common, produced for over a million years
not seen much outside of Africa, maybe lined up with the migration time
Earliest fire use
earliest evidence of controlled fire use dates to the Homo erectus
Wonderwerk Cave, South Africa - dates to 1mya; burned bone and plant material
Gesher Benot Ya’aqov, Isreal - 700,000 yrs; burnt wood and flint
difficult to recognize the start of fire use, but whenever it was, it was an amazing development
have to rule out natural causes first - brush fires, lightning strikes
Homo erectus use would be in discreet areas, restricted to just certain areas, evidence of hearths
How did fire change the lives of early hominins?
changes in culture and biology
cooking - destroying toxins and bacteria, less energy to digest cooked food - decrease in teeth and jaws, increase in brain, shortening digestive tract - changed physical characteristics
warmth - expand into other environments, migration
protection - safer on ground, from predators
light source - extending hours of usable time
culture - stories, socialization, passing on
homo floresiensis - “the Hobbit”
very unique hominin species discovered on the Indonesian island of Flores
date between 100,000 - 60,000 years - Liang Bua site
tiny hominin with a small cranial capacity of 420ccm - chimp size, and only 3.5 ft tall
despite its small brain size, there is evidence of tool use, hunting, and fire use
the Mata Menge site (same island) date to 800,000 yrs
this branch of hominins is a recent discovery, and is unusual for this time period
15 individuals have been found, indicating a whole population lived here
well represented skeletons - skull, limp proportions, pelvis
looks a lot like erectus (especially the skull), though to have evolved from the initial homo erectus species from that area
island dwarfism - have found dwarf mammals here, less predators, large body not needed
volcanic eruptions, or modern human migration are guesses as to extinction
homo naledi
another recently discovered species - dated to 335,000 - 236,000 yrs ago
many fossils were found from the Rising Star Cave System in South Africa
over 1500 fossil representing 15 individuals have been identified, well represented
has features similar to Homo and Australopithecines, although more like Homo
fossils found deep within the Dinaledi Cave
females 4.5, males 5 - 460-560ccm cranial capacity
discovered by cave explorers - fossils scattered the floor, incredibly difficult to get to, areas being ten inches tall to crawl through
no sight of carnivore marks - not dragged in or water drag; seems likely that they were dropped there
debated from site : was it intentional disposal of dead, burial - striations found, could be considered artwork