1/45
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Crime
Act or omission committed against the community at large that is punishable by the state. (Omission: Failure to act)
Elements of crime
Society’s culture, history, legal traditions, social attitudes, philosophical and religious beliefs determines whether or not something is a crime
Actus Reus
The criminal act that you have to prove the suspect committed
Mens rea
the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes part of a crime

Strict Liability
Where you only have to prove the act (Actus Reus), without intention (Mens Rea) E.g Speeding
Causation
Definition: The principle that it is the link between the act and the harm. Prove the act itself is the substantial cause of the harm (Wallace v Kam) (2013)
Types of Crimes
Offences against another person : Sexual assault, assault, homicide
Offences against the sovereign : Treason/Terrorism
Economic offences : Robbery from property,
Public Order offences : Peeing in public
Driving offences : Driving
Drug offences : Drugs
Preliminary offences : Planning but not actually commit a crime
3 levels of Mens Rea
Intentions - Clear, malicious or willful intention to commit crimes. Highlight and most difficult lead to prove.
Recklessness - Intermediate level. The accused was aware their actions could lead to an act of crime but does anyways.
Criminal Negligence - Accused fail to foresee the risk, allows avoidable danger to occur. Resulting in harm/death
Barrister
The lawyer who represents the accused in court.
Role of the barrister
Provides legal opinions, prepares cases, presenting arguments and examining witnesses
Goal of the barrister
The goal is the acquittal of the accused. If aqquitt al is not possible. Aim to mitigate circumstances to court for a more lenient sentence.
Influence of strict liability
Lowers the amount of cases the court deals with.
Allow matters to be dealt with similarly without going to court
Any appeals can be made regularly. It will be heard first in the local court by a magistrate
Summary offences
Summaries - Less severe offences heard and sentenced by a magistrate without a jury. E.g trespassing, disorderly conduct
Judgement and punishment determined by a magistrate
Charges usually laid by police officer/Government officer
Punishment less severe (e.g fine, community service, behaviour bond.
Indictable offences
Indictable - More serious offences and punishment, heard by judge or jury E.g Muder, rape, arson
Judgement determined by jury, punishment determined by the judge.
Charge brought by a public prosecutor worthy for the state.
Parties to a crime
Principle in first degree - Person committing main criminal act
Principal in second degree - Person at scene, assisting or encouraging main offender
Accessory before the fact - person who plan/prepare for crime before main act
Accessory after the fact - Person who commits the principle after the crime has been committed.
Situational crime prevention
Situational: Aim to make it difficult to commit crime or remove reward of temptation in specific situations. E.g warning signs, improving alarm/security, colour tags.
Social Crime prevention
Social: Aims to address the wider socio-economic factors that contribute to criminal activity. E.g Improving home environment, reducing social and economic disadvantage and running targeted youth programs.
Police Powers
Police are responsible for enforcing the law by investigating crimes, gathering evidence, and detaining suspects. Their role in the criminal process is to build a case and present evidence to court for a trial.
Police Powers legislation outlining range of authority
NSW police powers found in Law enforcement (Powers and responsibility) Act 2002 (NSW) Main powers include
Question and detain suspect
Search and seizure
Reasonable force if necessary
Use of particular technology
Arrest and interrogate suspect
Recommend when bail should be granted
reporting crime
Police needs to be aware of a crime is or has been committed in order to investigate
Gathering Evidence and why
Balance of severity, success likelihood and resources available
Search and seizure
Evidence includes witness testimony, physical objects, videos, documents, and forensic data like DNA and fingerprints.
Admissibility is key: Evidence must be uncompromised to avoid being ruled inadmissible in court.
Use of technology
While technology promotes automation and efficiency, over-reliance on any single type (e.g., DNA) can sometimes lead to wrongful convictions.
Search and Seizure
Search Powers: In NSW, police can stop and search a person without a warrant if they have reasonable grounds for suspicion.
Warrant
Legal document issued by a judge/magistrate authorizing police to use a special power (e.g., search premises, conduct a wiretap).
Arrest Without Warrant
Police can legally arrest someone without a warrant with conditions:
Person committing an offence.
Reasonable grounds a person is about to commit an offence.
Reasonable grounds that a person has committed an indictable offence.
Legal Arrest Procedure
For a lawful arrest police must inform the person they are under arrest and state the reason. Allowed to use reasonable force if necessary
Detention Limit:
In NSW, for investigation and interrogation. police can only detain a person for a maximum of 4 hours (without charging or releasing them)
Detention Outcome:
Before the detention period ends, police must either:
Release the suspect unconditionally.
Charge them with an offence.
After Charging:
If charged and held in custody, the accused must be brought before a court.
Bail
Temporary release of an accused awaiting trial, sometimes conditions such as a lodgement of money as a garauntee
A bail hearing,
court or authorised officer determines whether the accused should be released on bail or remand in custody before trial
If bail is granted, accused can be released under conditions such as monitoring, curfew or money lodgement
Remand
Accused is held in custody awaiting trial
Court Jurisdiction
Original : Hear the case for the first time
Appellate : Review a case appeal from a lower court
Adversarial System
Used in Australian courts as it reduces potential for a biased judge.
Two opposing parties present their argument and evidence before an impartial judge, judge acts as a referee.
Magistrate and judge
Magistrate - Determines guilt and sentencing for lower courts (Local)
Judge - Presides over intermediate and superior courts
Police and public prosecutor
Police - Trained to prosecute summary offences (e.g speeding)
Public - Prosecutor on the behalf of the state for indictable offences
Public defender and prosecution
Public defender - Barrister/solicitor represents the defendant
Prosecution - Presents their case and evidence in order to proof the defendant guilty.
Plea
Formal statement made by defendant stating whether or not they are guilty/not before a trial starts
Charge negotiation
When a prosecutor offers a defendant a lower charge in exchange for a guilty plea. Resource efficient as it skips trial and ensure conviction, though it does not necessarily achieve justice
Legal representation and aid
There is no express rights to legal representation in australia
Legal and aid may assist in legal representation but they test before
Means
Merit (Whether case will succeed)
Jurisdiction (Cannot represent a defamation case
Burden of Proof
Who must prove something before the courts. prosecutor is burdened to prove if the defendant is guilty. Innocent until proven guilty proven guilty (ICCPR)
Standard of proof
Guilt must be proved beyond reasonable doubt for a criminal conviction.
Type of evidence and its legislation
Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)
Real evidence : Weapon, DNA, fingerprint , photograph
Documentary evidence: Letters, emails, contracts
Witness testimony: Eye witness recount on observation or expert witness with profession e.g psychologist.
Complete defence
If complete is successful, will result in an aqquital (innocent)
Automatism R v Cogdon (1950) killed daughter while sleeping
Self-defence
Diress R v Abusafaiha (1991) Robbery where man claimed his family was held under gun threat
Insanity (Martin Bryant v Q) (1996)
Consent (e.g surgery, tattoo, contact sport)
Mistake
Necessity R v Dudley and Stevens (1884) lifeboat case
Partial defence
In order to gain a reduced sentence
Extreme provocation (R V camplin) 1978 SA then teased
Excessive self defence (Unreasonable)
Mental health (only for extreme cases)
Juries
Juries: Societies involvement in justice, 12 randomly selected adults. Cannot have criminal convictions. Cannot be lawyers and police
Can only assess what evidence is given in court e.g witnesses, documents and real evidence.