1/41
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
PMMA (polymethyl metacrylate)
material of choice for full denture bases and “gumwork” for removable devices
available commercially as heat-cure, cold-cure, or light-cure
heat-cure and cold-cure are most widely used in
denture fabrication
steps of addition polymerization
1) activation
2) initiation
3) propagation
4) termination
activation
benzoyl peroxide and other compounds break down into free radicals when heated
initiator starts the setting reaction
inhibitors scavenge free radicals until inhibitor is depleted
initiation
free radicals attack double bonds of monomers
activated monomers initiate chain-growing reaction
propagation
monomers continue to add to growing chain until most of monomer is consumed
heat is given off at this stage
termination
monomer is depleted
two free radicals react and form stable molecule
reaction stops
compared to heat-cure resins, self-cure resins have
lower Mw
higher porosity
higher retained monomer
lower strength
require accelerator to cure at room temperature
accelerators/activators
make a resin self-curing
usually aromatic amines that make initiator unstable and form a free radical at ambient temps
DMPT is most common
must be mixed with initiator before polymerization will begin
cause poorer color stability of self-cure resins
most widely used light-cure initiator system
combination of camphorquinone (photosensitizer) and amine (initiator)
commercial heat- and cold-cured denture base resins are usually supplied as
two components
POWDER and LIQUID mixed together in 3:1 ratio
separates monomer from initiator
for cold-cure, separates initiation from activator
components of powder
acrylic polymer beads
initiator
pigments
plasticizer
components of liquid
monomer
inhibitor
accelerator/activator
cross-linking agent
plasticizer
if polymer/monomer ratio is too high
insufficient monomer to wet the powder and fill voids → porous resin
incomplete polymerization → granular resin
insufficient plasticity to fill denture flask to form shape
if polymer/monomer ratio is too low
excess monomer → excess polymerization shrinkage
poor dimensional accuracy
stages in physical reaction during self-cure acrylic processing
sandy → stringy → doughy → rubbery → solid
doughy stage
most of monomer has been absorbed into polymer beads
mix loses its adhesiveness and separates cleanly
material has sufficient body for adequate pressure in packing; still plastic and malleable enough to completely fill and take on shape of mold cavity
“just right”
rubbery stage
all the monomer is absorbed into polymer particles or evaporated
swollen, plasticized polymer beads are completely coalesced → form rubbery mass
“gone too far”
if monomer evaporates too quickly
material reaches rubbery stage too soon
factors affecting dough-forming times
particle size
powder MW
plasticizer
temperature
polymer/monomer ratio
self-curing
particle size
smaller polymer powder particles have greater SA/V → take up monomer rapidly and decrease dough-forming time
powder molecular weight
absorption of monomer decreases as polymer MW in powder increases → increases dough-forming and working times
plasticizer
decreases dough-forming time
increases working time
temperature
lower temperatures increase working times because polymerization is exothermic
polymer/monomer ratio
the less monomer absorbed into polymer, the less dough-forming time
self-cure resins have shorter working times than
heat-cure resins
manufacturer controls
particle size
powder MW
plasticizer
mold liners minimize
monomer penetration into gypsum, which causes roughness and adhesion to mold
diffusion of water from gypsum into dough, which causes blanching and crazing
packing is done during the
doughy stage → material has enough body to allow overfilling of mold
compression molding technique
pressure squeezes dough into mold
helps maintain denture’s proper dimensions
injection molding technique
resin injected into mold under pressure
improved clinical accuracy in fine detail
much lower resin viscosity
fluid resin technique
specially designed flask filled with reversible hydrocolloid investment medium
uses low-viscosity, pourable chemical-cure resin
pour resin into mold instead of packing dough
advantages of fluid resin technique
improved adaptation to underlying soft tissues
less damage to prosthetic teeth and denture bases during deflasking
reduced material costs
simplification of flasking, deflasking, and finishing procedures
disadvantages of fluid resin technique
shifting of prosthetic teeth during processing
air entrapment w/in denture base
poor bonding between denture base and acrylic teeth
technique sensitivity
if temperature is too low during heat-curing cycle
incomplete polymerization
large amount of residual monomer
weak denture
if temperature is too high during heat-curing cycle
monomer may boil → gas bubbles → porosity
with immersion of flasked denture case into a water bath, use
alternative heat-curing cycles
properties of cured resin
molecular weight as high as 1,200,000
0.2-0.5% residual monomer
2% water at equilibrium
crazing
tensile stresses in resin that may cause network of surface microcracks
can eventually lead to cracks and fractures
craze resistance is markedly improved by
crosslinking
dimensional inaccuracy can arise from
polymerization shrinkage
mold cavity expansion
thermal contraction