1/109
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What is mental status?
The level of global functioning one is subject to at any given point in time
What is included in mental status?
Memory, orientation, sensorium, drive, affect, cognition/concentration, delusions
What are delusions?
Unreasonable thoughts that don't stand logical scrutiny
What type of conditions are characterized by disruptions in areas of mental status?
Axis 1: schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, bipolar
What is mental status related to in terms of forensic psychology?
Fitness to stand trial and criminal responsibility
What is actus reus?
A guilty act
What is mens rea?
A guilty mind
What is needed to establish guilt?
Actus reus and mens rea
What component of guilt is the concern of psychologists?
Mens rea
What is offenders current mental status relevant to?
Fitness to stand trial
What is offenders mental status at time of offence (MSO) relevant to?
Mens rea
How can mens rea be graded?
Purpose, knowledge, recklessness, and negligence
If an offenders purpose was to murder/they intended, what would it be described as?
First degree murder
If a person went on harming someone despite knowledge of them potentially dying, what would it be described as?
Second degree murder
If a person recklessly ignored the risk of their behaviour in causing someones death, what could it be described as?
Manslaughter
If a person failed to consider the lethal outcome of their behaviour, what is the likely result for offenders?
Failed due diligence, potential manslaughter
What is fitness to stand trial NOT concerned with?
Mental status at the time of the offence
What is one of the most common questions on a forensic order for examination and report?
Is the offender fit to stand trial?
When was fitness to stand trial first addressed in British common law?
17th century
Why was fitness to stand trial first questioned?
It seemed unfair to try someone if they're unable to defend themselves
What was reasoning for elective mutism in fitness to stand trial considerations?
Class structure had lower-level individuals who didn't understand laws scared to defend themselves
What were three explanations of mutism back in early law?
Mute by malice (non cooperative), mute by visitation from god (insanity), muted by visitation from the devil
What was the outcome if a person was mute by malice?
They were tortured until they pleaded
What was the outcome if a person was mute by visitation from god?
They weren't prosecuted
What was the outcome if a person was mute by visitation from the devil?
They were tested by water (also torture but intended to separate from those unwilling, usually fatal)
What was the ruling if a person tested by water died under the water?
They were innocent
What was the ruling if a person tested by water came back up alive?
They were guilty; rejected by the water
What is the criteria underlying fitness?
Sufficient age, cognitive adequacy, sanity
What was sufficient age to test fitness to stand trial vs now?
Was 10, now at least 12
Why must sanity be considered in testing fitness to stand trial?
Must be absent of debilitating mental disorder to be able to defend self
Is it possible to be "insane" and fit to stand trial in todays world?
Yes
When does insanity dictate one to be unable to stand trial?
If mental disorder compromises ability to:
-Understand role of courtroom participants
-Understand charge of criminal offense
-Instruct counsel
What is the level of understanding of courtroom participants required to be able to stand trial?
Understanding adversarial nature
-You vs them, judge is referee
What is the level of understanding of charge of criminal offence required to be able to stand trial?
Must know the range of outcomes
-Not guilty means not punished
*could potentially believe innocence is bad
What is the level of ability to instruct counsel required to be able to stand trial?
Must be able to participate in viable defence and challenge a prosecution witness
What must be remembered in determining fitness to stand trial?
-Presence of diagnosis isn't enough
-Amnesia of events isn't enough
-No requirement that defendant must act in their own best interest
-Fitness can change over time, or "become fit"
-Fitness can be questioned at any time
If a person uses amnesia of events as a defence, what could be countered?
What is the basis for a not-guilty plea if events aren't remembered
In determining fitness, what is presumed?
Defendant is fit
What is the standard timeframe for a fitness evaluation?
30 days
-Good stall tactic
Why may a judge use a fitness evaluation/make fit order?
To force treatment on person that clearly needs it
What is often confused by lawyers?
Fitness and MSO/criminal responsibility
What if offender is found unfit?
Can be sent to psychiatric up to 2 years (previously indefinite)
Why is fitness defense a lousy strategy for minor crimes?
The punishment for the crimes is usually less than duration of psych treatment
What is the typical unfit patient?
-Low IQ
-No fixed address
-Lengthy psych history
-Few community supports (happy to be in hospital)
What other areas besides fitness is competency questioned?
-Competency to confess
-Competency to refuse an insanity defense
-Competency to refuse counsel
-Fitness to testify
-Competency to be sentences and executed (US)
Are confessions made by an insane person admissible?
Yes, unless their illness was used to obtain confession
Why would a person refuse an insanity defense?
A finding of guilt may be less consequential
When can't a person refuse council?
If refusal is based on delusional/paranoid beliefs (lawyer is working with other side)
When does an understanding of truth versus falsehood occur?
Mental age of 7-10
Can a person under 12 be prosecuted?
No, but may be asked to testify
Why must a person be competent to be executed?
It is wrong to punish a person for reasons they don't comprehend
Why is making a person competent an ethical issue?
They may become subject to scrutiny of execution
What is required for an NCR finding?
MSO impairment
What are the roots of MSO?
Lunatics in ancient Greece
-Low class, low functioning individuals committed crimes at full moons (lunar cycle)
What did people in Ancient Greece believe caused crime? What is this?
The moon, superstition
How does the public view the "insanity" defense?
See it as a legal loophole
How successful is the insanity defense?
30%
When is the insanity defense efficient?
Can result in lower sentences for major crimes
What allowed Dorothy Joudrie to receive such a small penalty for the murder of her husband?
The insanity defense
-Only 6 months in psych hospital
What crime did Daniel M'Naughton commit?
Murdered Edward Drummond (mistook him for PM Robert Peel)
Why did M'Naughton commit the crime?
He believed the tories compelled him, and that he was threatened
Why was M'Naughton acquitted of the murder charge?
He genuinely believed he was threatened, committed murder in self defence
What did Tindal rule permissible given insanity?
If the accused was under such defect of reason that they didn't know the nature of what they were doing, or that it was wrong, they may be given defence
What was the problem with the M'Naughten ruling
Too rigorous, only applied to extremely impaired individuals
Who was never tried under the M'Naughton rule?
Daniel M'Naughton (probably would've been found guilty)
What replaced the M'Naughton rule?
Durham rule
What was the Durham rule?
The crime was a product of a mental defect or disease
What was the problem with the Durham rule?
Any mental illness pretty much qualified, even antisocial PD (which doesn't count)
What is the American Law Institute test?
Defendant failed to appreciate the wrongfulness of the act, or couldn't conform their behaviour to law as a result of mental illness or defect
What was the advantage of the ALI test?
Excludes ASPD/psychopathy, requires substantial but not total (like M'Naughton) impairment
In the US, where does burden of proof lie?
With either the prosecution or defense
In Alberta, where does burden of proof lie?
Raised by either side, with expert evidence used before decision is made
Why is ASPD excluded from insanity defense?
It doesn't impair the ability to appreciate wrongfulness
What does section 16 of the Canadian Criminal Code state?
No person is criminally responsible for an act committed or an omission made while suffering from a mental disorder that rendered the person incapable of appreciating the nature and quality of the act or omission or of knowing that it was wrong
What is the valuable addition of the CCC definition of NCR?
Omission, includes criminal negligence
What is the test used in finding people NCR in Canada?
Two part test: mental illness + non-appreciation
What is required in determining NCR?
Expert knowledge of psychopathology, cognitive issues, and malingering
What is the biggest mistake made in malingering?
Can't stay in character (present differently from context to context unrealistically)
-Feign low function when history shows better function
What was the outcome of R v Leary (1978)?
Self induced intoxication is not a defense in matters of general intent
What was the outcome of R v Daviault (1993)?
Leary ruling doesn't apply if intoxication is to the point that person is an automaton (not in control of self)
If someone is intoxicated and punches someone, resulting in their death, but they didn't intend to kill them, what would they be found under the Leary rule?
They are held responsible for the death, but not as murder
-Likely manslaughter
What does Section 33.1 of CCC provide?
Self-induced intoxication is not a viable defence in cases with an element of assault
What was found of the R v Bouchard-Lebrun (2011) case?
-Assaulted people while in a drug-induced psychosis
-Argued intoxication should place him in section 16
-Appeal denied
Why was R v Bouchard-Lebrun's appeal denied?
A malfunctioning of mind that results exclusively from self-induced intoxication cannot be considered a disease of the mind in the legal sense
How can intoxication bring in arguments of voluntariness?
Drug removed voluntariness in committing a crime
What was found in the R v Sullivan (2020) appeal?
Section 33.1 was unconstitutional and of no effect in Ontario
-Didn't protect persons presumed innocence
What is section 1 of the charter?
Limits placed upon a person must be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society
What is section 7 of the charter?
A person can't be deprived of life, liberty and security except in accordance to principles of fundamental justice
How is section 33.1 against section 11(d) of the charter?
Onus of proof is placed on the person, rather than being presumed innocent
Why is temporary insanity defense unavailable to people intoxicated at the time of offense?
Defense has to show disorder of chronic and persistent nature
Why are automatism defences rare exceptions?
They neutralize mens rea
When are automatism defences successful?
If there's evidence that the defendant sought treatment for condition (attempted to mitigate risk factors)
-CTE, epilepsy, involuntary intoxication
Why are automatism defenses great?
Don't wind up in psych hospital, and not found guilty
When may automatism be used as a defense?
Extreme cases of PTSD
What happens if you're found NCR?
-Come under Alberta board of review
-Slow release after several hearings (retained on warrants)
-Proceedings similar to court (judge, psych, crown, treatment team, forensic director)
-Stepped release into community
What may a lawyer argue of mens rea in the absence of insanity?
Diminished capacity
What issues would diminished capacity defences be useful in?
Specific intent
-Attempt to get conviction for lesser charge, general intent remains
How are some courts restricting psychologist testimony?
To matters of capacity to form criminal intent, not the intent itself
When would insanity not get an NCR defense in a crime?
Crime committed is apart from their illness
When can questions of defendants pre-existing character be raised?
If crime committed is characteristic of a different illness or apart from their illness