Aquinas's Cosmological Argument for God's Existence

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/34

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

35 Terms

1
New cards

Cosmology

The study of the universe, particularly concerning its origin and structure.

2
New cards

Contingent Being

A being whose existence depends on something else.

3
New cards

Necessary Being

A being whose existence is essential and not dependent on anything outside itself—Aquinas argues this is God.

4
New cards

Fallacy of Composition

An erroneous conclusion that what is true for parts must also be true for the whole, criticized by Bertrand Russell.

5
New cards

Occam's Razor

The principle that suggests the simplest explanation is usually the best one.

6
New cards

Brute Fact

A fact that exists without explanation; Bertrand Russell suggests the universe may be such a fact.

7
New cards

Infinite Regress

An endless chain of causes. Aquinas argues this is impossible

8
New cards

Principle of Sufficient Reason

The principle stating that everything must have an explanation or reason for its existence.

9
New cards

Aquinas's Third Way

Aquinas's argument centered on contingency and necessity, positing that a necessary being must exist.

10
New cards

Summa Theologica

A significant work by Aquinas that integrates Aristotelian thought about causes and existence.

11
New cards

Premise 1

Everything in the universe is contingent.

12
New cards

Premise 2

If everything were contingent, then there could have been a time when nothing existed.

13
New cards

Premise 3

If nothing existed, then nothing would exist now (thus leading to a contradiction).

14
New cards

Conclusion

Therefore, a necessary being must exist that is the cause of all contingent beings, which Aquinas argues is God.

15
New cards

Aquinas

A significant figure in Christian philosophy and theology who developed five ways he believed evidenced the existence of God.

16
New cards

Observation by Aquinas

If contingent beings exist, then a necessary being must exist for them to have come into being.

17
New cards

Contradiction in Contingency

The idea that if everything is contingent, there must have been a time when nothing existed.

18
New cards

Existence of God

Aquinas identifies the necessary being as God, who necessitates existence for everything else.

19
New cards

Empirical Basis

The cosmological argument is grounded in empirical observation, resonating well with principles of modern science and epistemology.

20
New cards

Consistency with Science

The cosmological argument aligns with the scientific view that the universe had a beginning (as suggested by the Big Bang theory).

21
New cards

Support from Contemporary Thinkers

Notable scholars, such as Father Frederick Copleston, have reiterated that a necessary being must exist to explain existence itself.

22
New cards

Fallacy of Composition

Bertrand Russell's critique states that just because parts of the universe are contingent, it does not logically follow that the universe as a whole must be contingent.

23
New cards

Brute Fact Argument

Russell argues that the universe itself may be a brute fact, existing without a requisite cause or explanation.

24
New cards

Contingency vs. Necessity

David Hume suggests that the universe itself could be the necessary being, challenging the notion that God must exist as the necessary being behind all.

25
New cards

Question of Causality

Critics argue that Aquinas's claim for an uncaused cause presents a contradiction.

26
New cards

Divergence from Christian Theism

John Mackie contends that Aquinas's cosmological argument does not definitively prove the God of Christian theism.

27
New cards

Aquinas's Third Way

Focus on necessity stemming from contingency.

28
New cards

Critiques

Russell's fallacy of composition and claims of brute facts highlight weaknesses.

29
New cards

Contemporary Support

Figures like Copleston uphold Aquinas's arguments.

30
New cards

Conclusion

The cosmological argument emphasizes the necessity of a primary cause due to the contingent nature of the universe.

31
New cards

Philosophical Inquiry

The implications of this discussion extend beyond philosophical inquiry as they touch the realm of personal faith and belief systems.

32
New cards

Existence of God

The arguments presented serve as a vital dialogue in the intersection of philosophy, science, and religion.

33
New cards

Nature and Attributes of the Divine

The discussion questions not just the existence of God, but the nature and attributes ascribed to the divine.

34
New cards

Philosophy and Theology

This structured approach aids in the understanding of both the argument and the essential critiques surrounding it.

35
New cards

Study of Philosophy

Provides a comprehensive overview for anyone engaged in the study of philosophy, theology, or the existence of God.