legal system

studied byStudied by 50 people
5.0(5)
Get a hint
Hint

precedent flow within the court hierarchy

1 / 46

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

even flow!!

Law

11th

47 Terms

1

precedent flow within the court hierarchy

knowt flashcard image
New cards
2

a judge-made decision that stands as an example or guide for future decisions in similar factual circumstances.

precedent

New cards
3

to stand by what has already been decided.

stare decisis

New cards
4

judges can follow and apply the reasoning of past similar case outcomes to decide the judgement of a case.

how does stare decisis apply to precedent?

New cards
5

precedent which binds courts at a lower level in the court hierarchy than the court that made the precedent

binding precedent

New cards
6

→high court

→supreme court

→district court

→magistrates court

court hierarchy

New cards
7

influences (not binded!!) the courts higher than and equal to the court that made the precedent

persuasive precedent

New cards
8

latin for “reason of decision”

ratio decidendi

New cards
9

it is the judge’s reasoning for the judgement they’ve made that is the critical component of precedent.

how does ratio decidendi relate to precedent?

New cards
10

binding precedent bind precedent to all lower courts, whereas persuasive precedent only influences (not binded) courts above and equal to the court in which the precedent is made

difference between persuasive and binding precedent

New cards
11

-obiter dicta (latin)

→”sayings by the way” - so that future judges with similar cases may use obiter dicta as a guide to their own decision making.

ratio decidendi

→the judicial reasoning for the judgement of a case.

two main parts of a legal decision

New cards
12

-evolution of common law

→replacing outdated precedents and adapting new precedents to changing society and circumstances)

fair * parties get the same treatment as other parties

predictability * parties can be reassured about how a court will judge their case based on similar past case outcomes

consistency * similar cases will have similar outcomes

flexibility * is there is no precedent, courts may be free to create new common law to resolve a case.

advantages to the common law system

New cards
13

→lower court judges who are bound by the precedents of higher courts may disagree of a precedent despite having to apply it. if a judge thinks a precedent is unjust, their ratio will outline the reasons for this. this invites a party to appeal to a higher court with the power to overrule the precedent (change to common law!!!)

→two courts at the same level may produce two different judgements, thus conflicting ratios in similar cases. both ratios will stand until the conflict is resolved.

-until the conflict is resolved, there will be confusion(breaching rule of law’s requirement for laws to be clear, consistent and coherent) and unpredictable.

disadvantages to a common law system

New cards
14

judgements of higher courts are binding on the lower courts.

doctrine of precedent

New cards
15

the non-critical judicial reasoning outlined in the decision of the courts

obiter dicta

New cards
16

the decisions of higher courts are binding on lower courts.

key to the doctrine of precedent

New cards
17

overruling

disapproving

distinguishing

reversing

how can the courts apply or change a precedent?

New cards
18

a superior court may create a new precedent rather than following the one already made if it was in a lower court

→If they disagree with the lower court, the superior court may substitute its own ratio.

overruling

New cards
19

Occurs when a court decides not to follow a previous decision set by a court at the same level.

→The high court sometimes takes this action and creates ‘new law’

disapproving

New cards
20

If a court decided that the case before it is substantially different on the facts  (the circumstances of a crime can be completely different to another, influencing the judgement of the case) from any previous case, its decision will be different or distinguished from existing precedents.

distinguishing

New cards
21

If the higher court finds the law has been misapplied it will reverse the judgement and substitute a correct ratio decidendi for the ratio used by the lower court.

→the fact that the law has been misapplied

reversing

New cards
22

law made by courts

common law

New cards
23

statue law

law made by parliament

New cards
24

common law is made by judges in a court, using precedent - decisions made in previous similar cases to decide the judgement of a case before them.

how common law applies to precedents

New cards
25

overruling, disapproving, distinguishing and reversing precedent

how the courts can apply doctrine of precedent

New cards
26

reversing a decision is based on the fact that the law has been misapplied, whereas overruling a decision is simply when the high court disagrees with the decision made in lower courts and can overrule it.

difference between reversing and overruling

New cards
27

rules of conduct enforceable by the court

→most powerful social controller and regulator that exists.

law

New cards
28

→to promote and represent the values of the community

→provide a structure for the creation, enforcement and alteration of the law in accordance with the wishes of society

regulate and control human activity within a society

→provide a clear statement of behaviours that are considered acceptable within the community.

→provide a basis for the protection of people against behaviour that removes their social and economic freedom

functions of laws

New cards
29

laws are “formal rules’ set by society as a whole. when they are broken, they are enforceable by the courts. however, informal rules are not enforceable through the courts

laws vs. rules

New cards
30

→protect and regulate key areas of social interaction for the public

purpose of public laws

New cards
31
  1. the people of the colonies (society)

2)the almighty god (religious times)

3)the crown.

constitution’s sources of authority

New cards
32

→strict rules of evidence and procedure

→consistent hearings

→right to an open hearing(transparency→justice)

→right to appeal

→presumption of innocence

→right to silence

rules of a fair and unbiased hearing

New cards
33

1)enforceability

→legal consequence for law breaking

2)universality

→the law applies to everyone, no one is above the law. informal rules may apply to a certain category of people.

3)legitimacy

→for the law to exist effectively, it must have legitimacy (consent of the people→whereby they follow the law through moral obligation, not coercion.

differences between laws and rules

New cards
34

regulating the conduct of individuals with other individuals

purpose of private laws

New cards
35

the order in importance of courts in legal decision making.

court hierarchy(define)

New cards
36

1)court of first instance

2)intermediate court

3)superior court

what does each state have in their court hierarchy?

New cards
37

→ensures judicial decisions are fair, predictable and consistent.

→helps precedents to flow down

→helps appeals to flow up

why have a court hierarchy?

New cards
38

-minor and indictable offences

-up to $75,000

magistrates court - jurisdictions

New cards
39

-serious criminal offences for which the max penalty is 20 years

-up to $750,000

districts court - jurisdictions

New cards
40

very serious criminal charges

above $750,000

supreme court - jurisdictions

New cards
41

minor and indictable offences (burglary), property cases

example of magistrates court case

New cards
42

breaking and entering, serious assult

example of districts court case

New cards
43

murder, manslaughter

example of supreme court case

New cards
44

the supreme court is granted to hear appeals from the supreme court of each state

S73 of constitution

New cards
45

lower courts follow the decisions of higher courts

rule of court hierarchy

New cards
46

ensures consistency whilst allowing the law to be modified over time.

advantage of rule of court hierarchy

New cards
47
<p><mark data-color="blue">-coherency</mark></p><p>→usually consistent because it applies precedents</p><p><mark data-color="blue">-legally enforceable</mark></p><p>→ decisions of higher courts are binding on lower courts</p><p><mark data-color="blue">-reflect changing community values</mark></p><p>→acceptable laws and policies that are applied to the community</p><p><mark data-color="blue">transparency</mark></p><p>→citizens having the right to know and have access to documents about the government for <mark data-color="blue">effective public oversight.</mark></p>

-coherency

→usually consistent because it applies precedents

-legally enforceable

→ decisions of higher courts are binding on lower courts

-reflect changing community values

→acceptable laws and policies that are applied to the community

transparency

→citizens having the right to know and have access to documents about the government for effective public oversight.

what makes an effective law?

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 16 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 142 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 13 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 4 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 85 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 5 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 9 people
... ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 1 person
... ago
5.0(1)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (46)
studied byStudied by 15 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (28)
studied byStudied by 102 people
... ago
4.3(3)
flashcards Flashcard (30)
studied byStudied by 5 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (100)
studied byStudied by 9 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (23)
studied byStudied by 1 person
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (20)
studied byStudied by 2 people
... ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (36)
studied byStudied by 6 people
... ago
5.0(1)
robot