1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Q1: Why is the Orgel equation used to estimate resonance frequency?
The Orgel equation is a simplified model based on an organ pipe analogy. It treats the pneumatic cavity like a resonating acoustic tube.
It gives a rough estimate of the first resonance frequency assuming:
One open end and one closed end
Uniform geometry and ideal conditions
This provides a quick check for expected dynamic behavior, but it doesn’t include damping or real-world losses.
Q2: Why is the estimated 122.5 kHz resonance not visible in the FFT?
Several valid reasons:
The sensor-cavity system acts like a low-pass filter, attenuating high frequencies.
The shock wave energy may not excite the cavity at 122.5 kHz sufficiently.
The data acquisition system’s effective bandwidth or sampling rate might limit detection of such high frequencies.
Internal sensor design (membrane mass/damping) may suppress this resonance.
Q3: Why do we see low-frequency peaks around 150–200 Hz instead?
These likely come from:
The shock wave’s broadband pressure jump, exciting natural modes of the system.
Probe housing vibration or reflections.
Interaction between the membrane and cavity structure, which often respond strongest to low frequencies.
This is a common behavior in dynamic sensors designed for unsteady flows — they sacrifice high-frequency sensitivity to be more robust in the operating range.
Q4: What does the absence of high-frequency content imply for data processing?
It shows that the sensor behaves as a low-pass filter, which:
Limits the ability to detect rapid fluctuations (e.g. blade passing events)
May underestimate pressure spikes in real turbomachinery tests
Therefore, correction functions, deconvolution, or dynamic calibration are needed during post-processing to recover the original signal shape.
Q5: How would you improve your FFT-based dynamic calibration in a future setup?
Use shorter cavities → pushes resonance frequency higher.
Improve sampling rate and resolution of the data acquisition system.
Use a more energetic shock to excite higher modes.
Place sensors closer to the wall to minimize signal distortion.
Implement windowing and filtering before FFT to isolate clean sections of the signal.