1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Net Zero (2)
Net Zero:
Striking a balance between what we emit and what we remove
Countries that aim Net Zero will have a lower ecological footprint
Limitations of Net Zero (1)
Limitations of Net Zero - finance, aviation, and foreign imports are not included in emission calculations
Carbon Neutrality (1)
Carbon neutral means balancing the carbon dioxide you release into the air with an equal amount removed or offset
Paris Agreement (8)
In 2015, the COP meeting in Paris resulted in the Paris Agreement
Set long term goal to keep temp below 1.5-2 degrees Celsius prediction
Strength: was voluntary - gives countries more autonomy, more flexibility, more effective
Encouraged nations to commit a total of 100 billion dollars a year to the Green Climate Fund, as a way for the wealthier countries to fund things like decarbonisation in lower-income countries
Cooperation, collaboration - involved to be successful
Decreasing environment injustice - HICs helping LICs - LICs put plans into place that benefits globally
Limitation: no clear ways to report and enforce countries to contribute, only about 83 billion out of 100 billion - 17 billion dollar difference
National sovereignty - the right of countries to govern themselves - HL ethics link
Kyoto Protocol (1997) (8)
Kyoto Protocol - 1997
Limitation: legally binding for developed countries
China and India were large polluters but were still developing at the time
Legally committed to reducing GHG emissions by a set amount within specific time frames
Largely considered a failure
Limitation - Targets were not legally binding for developing countries - China and India had no obligation
US disagreed with this exclusion, and decided not to participate with the protocol
At the end of the commitment period, emissions were higher than ever
Without the US onboard, many people questioned the usefulness of the protocol
Montreal Protocol
Adoption: Agreed upon on September 16, 1987, and entered into force on January 1, 1989
Universal Ratification: It is one of the rare international treaties to achieve universal participation by all United Nations member states
Core Targets: It legally binds countries to phase out nearly 100 man-made chemicals, including chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), halons, and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs)
The Kigali Amendment (2016): Expanded the protocol to phase down hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), which are powerful greenhouse gases used as replacements for ozone-depleting substances
Success and Recovery: Due to sustained global compliance, scientific projections indicate the ozone layer is recovering and expected to return to 1980 levels between 2040 and 2066 depending on the region
Carbon Sinks
Natural and artificial carbon sinks
Carbon sinks are natural or artificial deposits that absorb carbon from the atmosphere
Oceans and forests (wetlands, mangroves) are natural sinks, biological processes
Oceans - 50% of carbon emitted (holds and locks in place)
Forests - carbon sequestration through photosynthesis
Artificial techniques - carbon capture and storage:
Enhance and accelerate the rate of carbon sequestration
Extract from atmosphere and store in the earth's crust
Not acquired efficiently, causes carbon leakage
Carbon sinks are important help to combat climate change, but do not solve it
Take CO2 out of atmosphere, but does not prevent making more CO2 - level 2 of pollution management
Carbon Capture Technology - Mitigation Strategy
Two categories: biological (planting trees, changing farm practices - LICs), technological/chemical (direct air capture - require money, education - HICs)
Direct air capture- targeting low carbon concentration in atmosphere
Big fan pulls air through, reacts with chemical, captures 80% of CO2 from the air
Can make products out of it - combine CO2 with hydrogen makes a fuel that’s essentially carbon neutral
Solar Geoengineering
Volcanic explosion in Philippines lowered temp for four years
Aerosols created thick black clouds, radiation couldn't get in - cooling effect, negative radiative forcing
Plan to build a fleet of plants, up to 95 planes, 60k flights a year - sulphur dioxide into the atmosphere every year - cool by 0.3 degrees Celsius
Used as an excuse or argument against emission cuts
If one country were to do it alone, impacts are international/global, could create international tensions or unexpected consequences (affect weather patterns, country suffering from drought to have even less water)
Politics of solar geoengineering are so complex it may never happen
Emissions Trading System - Mitatgation Strategy
A mitigation strategy but does not solve the problem
Certain amount of emissions allowed to produce each year, can sell unused budget to other countries
Emissions trading
Trading allowances for emissions - able to share allowances between EU countries
EU's Emissions Trading System (ETS)
Financial incentive for the biggest emitters to cut back
Worked in EU bc EU countries are willing to switch
But other countries, this wouldn't work
Land Use Zoning - Adaptation Strategy
Land use zoning - demolishing houses, move away from the coast, rebuild - responding to sea level rise
Limitations: time, costs, political and social acceptance
Wetland restoration - are sinks but drainage areas
Take away homes, put wetlands back in
Coastal management - put dams, soil erosion, take sand from one place to another
Sponge City - Adaptation Strategy
Rewilding (restore habitats, absorb water), afforestation
Garden beds absorb excess moisture - sponge cities
Nanchang, China, Thailand, Central Park in New York, Germany
Sponge cities around China - Sponge City Pilot Program (2015) - 30 cities across the countries
Supplementing existing grey infrastructure with natural solutions
Sloping roofs allow water to runoff into garden beds to absorb it
Exterior walls lined with flowers and trees
Vegetation beds to purify rainwater - can reuse water
Replace concreate roads and sidewalks with permeable pavement with vegetation
Urban gardens were planted to absorb water
Supports urban biodiversity
Limitation: can only absorb water to a certain point (more rainfall than drainages), policies but not everyone complies (changing human behaviour), climate, hydrology, and socio-economics varies, ambitious designs are expensive and requires a lot of space which most cities don't have