1/56
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
what characterizes offensive weapons
movement under fire, survivability, and speed
what characterizes defensive weapons
volume of fire and intelligence
what if O>D
war is more common because war pays
what happens if D>O
lots of stalemates
why did deterrence fail in 1914
combatants failed to recognize that the offense/defense balance had shifted towards defense
what was the real tactical revolution involving armor
interwar combination of armor and dispersed strategy and airpower, producing blitzkrieg
why was aircraft potentially revolutionary
aircraft combined stealth/survivability and speed and could attack an adversary’s population without first defeating its military
what did airpower make possible
attacking civilians, industrial production/economy, and morale directly
what was the key assumption about bombers
the bomber will always get through
who developed a major theory about airpower
Guilio Douhet argued airpower could reduce the importance of ground operations and defenses, strategic airpower mattered more than tactical airpower and striking first was important
british theory of strategic bombing
center of gravity was civilian morale, terror bombing intended to reduce support for government
american theory of strategic bombing
center of gravity is industrial economy; attack economic bottlenecks and critical nodes (WWII oil and ball bearing attacks)
what truman say about atomic energy in 1945
it constituted a new force too revolutionary to consider within old ideas
jacob viner prediction
soldiers might be safer than civilians in urban homes
Bernard Brodie argument
the military’s purpose should shift from winning wars to averting them
how does conventional warfare differ from nuclear warfare
conventional war has a more monotone relationship between additional force and utility, nuclear war has diminishing marginal returns after a point
what is the nuclear shift
shift from wartime offense/defense to peacetime deterrence and coercion
what is the key factor in the nuclear revolution beyond the tech
the distribution of nuclear capabilities among multiple actors
3 paradoxical implications of MAD
1) the victim can also be responsible for vulnerability 2) killing weapons can be viewed as bad while killing people is viewed as good 3) more weapons may sometimes be better
Stability/Instability Paradox (SIP)
nuclear deterrence may stabilize the nuclear level while potentially allowing or failing to prevent limited conventional conflict
Mueller’s puzzle
why are there only 9 nuclear states rather than 43 that could become nuclear states?
why did McNamara call the cold war the social scientists’ war?
nuclear weapons made strategy really important, while social science also contributed to counterinsurgency and political development
Bernard brodie
Major civilian strategist who worked at RAND and helped develop thinling about nuclear strategy and the possibilities of a science of strategy
major advantage of Operations Research
systematic analysis had demonstrated advantages over relying solely on military experience
key contribution social science to strategy
theory
4 theories of why states acquire nuclear weapons
rational actor, bureacratic policies, domestic politics, and culture
preferred role for civilians in military strategy
they should be part of, rather than dominate, the defense-policy debate
Massive Retaliation
Eisenhower-era strategy of responding to a Soviet attack anywhere in the world with nuclear weapons, credibility declined after USSR developed nuclear weapons
3 key variables in early nuclear targeting
number of bombs, number of aircraft, and number of targets
what was SIOP designed to reduce
fratricide, time over target conflicts, and inefficiency
4 factors shaping early U.S. nuclear doctrine
strategic situation, technology, politics, and military organizational interests
what technological changes pushed the U.S. toward greater nuclear reliance
more powerful/mini bombs, increasing weapons and delivery systems, and expanded intelligence coverage that increased the number of potential targets
BRAVO targeting
targets intended to blunt soviet nuclear capability: bombers, airfrields, missiles, and sub bases
ROMEO targeting
targets intending to slow Soviet/Warsaw Pact conventional advances such as conventional forces and transportation infrastructure
DELTA targeting
soviet defense industry/industrial base supporting the war effort
civilian vs military conceptualization of deterrence
punishment vs denial
overkill
possessing or planning to use nuclear destructive capability far beyond what is necessary to accomplish strategic objectives
keynes quote
policymakers are influenced by theories even when they don’t realize it, so they should make their theoretical assumptions explicit
what is a military revolution
a development in tech, military organization, or political organization that changes the balance in favor of one form of force or threat over another
why is the nuclear revolution considered a military revolution
nuclear weapons fundamentally changed the relationship between offense and defense, war and peace, and threat/use of force
military revolutions that occurred before the nuclear revolution (in order)
Infantry, Artillery, Shot and Sail, Gunpowder, Rifilingm, Railroads and telegraph, Naval, Nuclear
major military revolutions especially important for 1880 WWI
Industrialization, railroads/telegraph, rifling, improved artillery, and the changing offense-defense balance
important defense and offense chain link
more machine guns and artillery means more firepower which means less mobility which means defense matters more so stalemate
Operations Analysis
a systematic, analytical approach to military problems that uses evidence and quantitative analysis to determone how to use resources and systems effectively, important to rise of civilian strategists
WWII applications of Operations research
air defense, anti-submarine warfare
difference between operations research and systems analysis
operations research worked better when comparing concrete systems with known characteristics. Systems Analysis was much less successful when trying to model large competing strategies, such as whether to prepare for a first strike
how did airpower revolutionize warfare
it seperated strategic victory from tactical victory
what did WWII demonstrate about strategic bombing
airpower could not win the war by itself
2 challenges to Brodie
1) the military never brought into MAD/deterrence and wanted to use nukes like conventional weapons
2) other civilian thinkers asked what constituted stable deterrence
Wohlstetter
wizard of armaggedeon, worked for us govt before WWII, dragged into war effort to manage industrial production, spent 12 years at RAND
delicate balance of terror
concern that MAD could be unstable because deterrence depends on vulnerable nuclear forces
What was Wohlstetter’s key innovation in the basing study
he asked what would happen if the Soviets targeted U.S. bombers rather than cities
What did Wohlstetter conclude about SAC vulnerability
75-85% of U.S. bombers could be destroyed in a Soviet first strike
Why were U.S. overseas bases vulnerable
short-range bombers needed bases near the Soviet Union, making them vulnerable to attack
what is the purpose of the nuclear triad
redundancy: ensuring some nuclear forces survive a first strike and can retailiate
what makes a robust second strike capability
it must be sustainable, survivable, controllable, and effective
what was wohlstetter’s core insight about deterrence?
a secure second-strike capability is essential for stable nuclear deterrence