AP Psych Unit 13: Intelligence & Testing

0.0(0)
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/30

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

31 Terms

1
New cards

Intelligence

  • General Definition- the ability to learn information, use it and solve problems

2
New cards

General Intelligence (g)

  • that intelligence was a single thing 

  1. Underlying Factor- intelligence applied to all topics 

  2. Factor Analysis- looking at test results of many people and try to find common patterns/themes

    • Crossover- scores in one subject will be roughly equal to scores in other subjects, consistency

3
New cards

Multiple Intelligences

  • The idea that intelligence can be broken up into different parts (subjects)

4
New cards

Savant Syndrome

  • someone with genius level ability in a specific area and average or below average intelligence everywhere else

  • “Island of Brilliance”- term used in Europe

5
New cards

Gardner’s Eight

  • Linguistic (word smart)- has aptitude for books, writing, language

  • Logical-Mathematical (math smart)- does well in mathematics, problem solving

  • Musical- has musical talent, can play/sing by ear, in pitch

  • Spatial (picture smart)- visual images, maps 

  • Bodily-Kinesthetic (body smart)- understand their body and can manipulate it, ex. athletes, dancers, actors

  • Intrapersonal (self smart)- knows themself very well

  • Interpersonal (people smart)- instinctively understand others, have empathy, know how to manipulate/motivate people

  • Naturalist- good with plants, animals

6
New cards

Sternberg’s Triarchic

  • Analytical- can you analyze and problem solve?

  • Creative- can you make something new?

  • Practical- can you actually do stuff with what you know?

7
New cards

Talents or Intelligences?

  • What people think should be added to the multiple intelligences theory

  • Emotional Intelligence

  • Creativity

8
New cards

Emotional Intelligence

  • The ability to Perceive, Understand and Manage/control emotions in yourself and other people

  • Too similar to intrapersonal/interpersonal intelligence, it already has been covered

9
New cards

Creativity

  • The ability to make something that is Novel (new) and Valuable (recognized by others as having some level of worth) -> subjective

  • Components- things needed to make it happen

    • Expertise- need to be able to actually produce what you're creating, have the skills and talent

    • Imagination- need to come up with something new/unique

    • Adventure- creating something new is risky

    • Intrinsic Motivation- must feel compelled to do it

    • Creative Environment- any that fosters creativity

10
New cards

Influences

  • Genetics 

    • has a (MUCH) greater influence on intelligence

    • Increases with Age, by 7-8 genetics are determining things such as test scores

    • Twin Studies- twins adopted by different families, twins intelligence scores are closest to each other even with different environments

  • Environmental

    • Early Intervention- identifying low intelligence students early and helping them will help their intelligence, though small improvement

      • You can improve discipline and study habits- helps them to deal with low intelligence

11
New cards

Group Differences

  • Some are higher/lower, but no one wants to study and find out why

  • Gender- men at the extremes (low/high), and women more at average

  • Racial- some higher/lower, hypothesized= might be because of environment

12
New cards

Alfred Binet

  • created first good (reliable and gave useful results) intelligence test

  • Mental Age (ma)- for each age group, identify what they should know and be able to do

    • Higher than your age- above average 

    • At your age- average

    • Lower than your age- below average

  • Became the first widely used standard test

  • Reasoning and Problem Solving questions 

  • Intervention- purpose- people with low intelligence would be given intervention to be brought up to average

13
New cards

Lewis Terman

  • Stanford-Binet Test- Takes Binet’s test, improves it and that test becomes standard in America and most of the world up until the end of 1900s

    • More aspects, more complete/fuller

  • IQ = ma/ca x 100, Intelligence Quotient

    • Mental age/Chronological age x 100

  • Relative Scale- you are comparing people of the same age group

  • Eugenics- identify subjects with undesirable characteristics and prevent them from being passed on, remove them from gene pool

14
New cards

Intellectual Disability Scale

  • (Mental Retardation)- mentally “delayed”, > 2.5% of population, cannot take care of themselves/function normally in society with significant assistance

    • Profound (Below 20)- will never get past mental age of infant

    • Severe (20-35)- have mental ability of 1-2 yo

    • Moderate (35-50)- have mental ability of 3-6 yo, can walk, talk and very basic tasks

    • Mild (50-70)- mental age of older child, 6-12 yo, probably are aware of it, can be productive members of society- job training

15
New cards

Normal Range

  • makes up 95% of population, can function normally w/o supervision

    • Low Normal (70-90)- can work skilled labor jobs, can manage other people

    • Average (90-110)- most of the population ~70%

    • High Normal (110-120)- little bit brighter than the rest- in honors/AP classes, take on more complicated jobs- engineers, doctors

16
New cards

High Range

  • >2.5% of population

    • Superior (120-140)- clearly brighter than average, professors

    • Genius (140 and above)- very rare, really bright, increasingly difficult to assess people the higher you go

17
New cards

Flynn Effect

  • Increase in IQ scores that was seen in the 1900s

  • Average changes 

  • Plateau and slight decline in past 30 years

18
New cards

Modern Testing- Categories

  • Achievement- test that analyzes what you know and can do

    • ex. regular class tests

  • Aptitude- test of your potential- what you could do

    • useful bc they are Predictive of future performance

19
New cards

Modern Testing- Concerns

  • Standardization- creating one test for many people

    • Have a basis for comparison

    • Important for assessing school performance

    • Normal Distribution- want a bell curve, most people near middle/average 

    • Correcting for the Flynn Effect- as society’s average changes, you have to adjust how results are calculated

  • Reliability

    • Its ability to produce consistent results time after time, from person to person

    • Good test- 150-200 questions

    • Test-Retest- if you have the same person take it twice, do they get about the same results?

    • Split-half- the first half of the test should have the same score has the second half

  • Validity- does the test test what it's supposed to measure?

    • Content- is your test testing the correct subject

    • Predictive- do aptitude tests really predict what they are supposed to?

  • Bias

    • Cultural Variation- some cultures do better on certain kinds of questions and worse on others

    • Stereotype Threat- the assumption that everybody has the same common knowledge

20
New cards

Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)

*timed

  • Verbal section- like an english test

  • Performance section- math, problem solving

  • Composite- those two scores put together

21
New cards

SAT- Scholastic Aptitude Test

  • The test for predicting college performance

  • Math, Verbal, Written English, Equating sections

  • Why it's still used- It is the best predictor of future college performance, better than essays, GPA, everything

22
New cards

State/Grade-Level Exams

  • All achievement tests

  • Ex. EOC, EOG, NCFE 

  • CAT- California Achievement Test-> Nationwide achievement test for elementary school students

23
New cards

Woodcock-Johnson (General Intellectual Ability)

  • Comprehensive Knowledge- how much you know

  • Fluid Reasoning- can you learn something and and then use it to problem solve

  • Processing Speed- timed element

24
New cards

Psychological Assessments Goal

to identify:

  1. Personality traits 

  2. Potential mental health disorders

25
New cards

Inventories

  1. Purpose

    • Personality

    • Only provide a General Screening for disorders- not diagnostic tool

  1. Types of Questions

    • Respond to statements on a degree- totally disagree to totally agree

  1. Size

    • hundreds of questions, takes hours

    • Long so person doesn’t lie

  1. Types

    • Self-reporting- you fill it out yourself

26
New cards

MMPI- Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory

  • 10 categories of questions to look at 10 potential problems

    Scales

  • Hypochondriasis- someone who thinks they're sick when they're not

  • Depression

  • Hysteria- can’t control emotions

  • Psychopathic Deviance

  • Masculine/Femininity 

  • Paranoia 

  • Psychasthenia- people with anxiety and obsessions

  • Schizophrenia- disorders where you have lost touch w/ reality

  • Mania- people who are always up

  • Social Introversion- how shy/extroverted are you

27
New cards

California Psychological Inventory (CPI)

  1. Similarities to MMPI

    • Same format, similar length

  1. 4 Categories- grouped characteristics

    • Poise, Self-Assurance, Ego

    • Socialization, Responsibility Intrapersonal Values, Character

    • Achievement Potential and Intellectual Efficiency

    • Intellectual and Interest Modes

  • Created 4 quadrant role identities

    • Implementer, supporter, innovator, visualizer

28
New cards

Problems with Inventories

  • Validity- do they actually do a good job screening for disorders?

  • Meaning- what do the results actually mean?

  • Ability to Cope- it cannot measure your ability to cope

    • You might have high levels of stress, depression, etc but you can handle it fine

  • Barnum Effect- “We have something for everyone” the belief that you can find something wrong with anybody if you look hard enough

29
New cards

Vocational Interest Tests

  • Purpose- a test designed to identify a career you might be interested in and might be good at

  • Validity- does this really give you a good idea of what kind of job you'd be interested in/be good at?

30
New cards

Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory

  • Has 6 quadrants with different types of careers (social, artistic, etc)

  • Question Types- either/or questions

  • Comparison- results are compared to different people and careers 

  • Problems- people read too much into the results

31
New cards

Alternatives to Vocational Interest Tests

  • Interviews- talk to candidates to see if they would be a good fit

    • Halo Effect- people are on their best behavior and give the interviewer the answers they want, not necessarily the honest answer 

    • Reverse Halo Effect- no matter what the interviewed person says, it's the wrong thing 

    • Standout- the person who stands out gets remember over the best candidate  

  • Situational Assessments- bring in a candidate and have them do the job on a trial basis