1/30
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Intelligence
General Definition- the ability to learn information, use it and solve problems
General Intelligence (g)
that intelligence was a single thing
Underlying Factor- intelligence applied to all topics
Factor Analysis- looking at test results of many people and try to find common patterns/themes
Crossover- scores in one subject will be roughly equal to scores in other subjects, consistency
Multiple Intelligences
The idea that intelligence can be broken up into different parts (subjects)
Savant Syndrome
someone with genius level ability in a specific area and average or below average intelligence everywhere else
“Island of Brilliance”- term used in Europe
Gardner’s Eight
Linguistic (word smart)- has aptitude for books, writing, language
Logical-Mathematical (math smart)- does well in mathematics, problem solving
Musical- has musical talent, can play/sing by ear, in pitch
Spatial (picture smart)- visual images, maps
Bodily-Kinesthetic (body smart)- understand their body and can manipulate it, ex. athletes, dancers, actors
Intrapersonal (self smart)- knows themself very well
Interpersonal (people smart)- instinctively understand others, have empathy, know how to manipulate/motivate people
Naturalist- good with plants, animals
Sternberg’s Triarchic
Analytical- can you analyze and problem solve?
Creative- can you make something new?
Practical- can you actually do stuff with what you know?
Talents or Intelligences?
What people think should be added to the multiple intelligences theory
Emotional Intelligence
Creativity
Emotional Intelligence
The ability to Perceive, Understand and Manage/control emotions in yourself and other people
Too similar to intrapersonal/interpersonal intelligence, it already has been covered
Creativity
The ability to make something that is Novel (new) and Valuable (recognized by others as having some level of worth) -> subjective
Components- things needed to make it happen
Expertise- need to be able to actually produce what you're creating, have the skills and talent
Imagination- need to come up with something new/unique
Adventure- creating something new is risky
Intrinsic Motivation- must feel compelled to do it
Creative Environment- any that fosters creativity
Influences
Genetics
has a (MUCH) greater influence on intelligence
Increases with Age, by 7-8 genetics are determining things such as test scores
Twin Studies- twins adopted by different families, twins intelligence scores are closest to each other even with different environments
Environmental
Early Intervention- identifying low intelligence students early and helping them will help their intelligence, though small improvement
You can improve discipline and study habits- helps them to deal with low intelligence
Group Differences
Some are higher/lower, but no one wants to study and find out why
Gender- men at the extremes (low/high), and women more at average
Racial- some higher/lower, hypothesized= might be because of environment
Alfred Binet
created first good (reliable and gave useful results) intelligence test
Mental Age (ma)- for each age group, identify what they should know and be able to do
Higher than your age- above average
At your age- average
Lower than your age- below average
Became the first widely used standard test
Reasoning and Problem Solving questions
Intervention- purpose- people with low intelligence would be given intervention to be brought up to average
Lewis Terman
Stanford-Binet Test- Takes Binet’s test, improves it and that test becomes standard in America and most of the world up until the end of 1900s
More aspects, more complete/fuller
IQ = ma/ca x 100, Intelligence Quotient
Mental age/Chronological age x 100
Relative Scale- you are comparing people of the same age group
Eugenics- identify subjects with undesirable characteristics and prevent them from being passed on, remove them from gene pool
Intellectual Disability Scale
(Mental Retardation)- mentally “delayed”, > 2.5% of population, cannot take care of themselves/function normally in society with significant assistance
Profound (Below 20)- will never get past mental age of infant
Severe (20-35)- have mental ability of 1-2 yo
Moderate (35-50)- have mental ability of 3-6 yo, can walk, talk and very basic tasks
Mild (50-70)- mental age of older child, 6-12 yo, probably are aware of it, can be productive members of society- job training
Normal Range
makes up 95% of population, can function normally w/o supervision
Low Normal (70-90)- can work skilled labor jobs, can manage other people
Average (90-110)- most of the population ~70%
High Normal (110-120)- little bit brighter than the rest- in honors/AP classes, take on more complicated jobs- engineers, doctors
High Range
>2.5% of population
Superior (120-140)- clearly brighter than average, professors
Genius (140 and above)- very rare, really bright, increasingly difficult to assess people the higher you go
Flynn Effect
Increase in IQ scores that was seen in the 1900s
Average changes
Plateau and slight decline in past 30 years
Modern Testing- Categories
Achievement- test that analyzes what you know and can do
ex. regular class tests
Aptitude- test of your potential- what you could do
useful bc they are Predictive of future performance
Modern Testing- Concerns
Standardization- creating one test for many people
Have a basis for comparison
Important for assessing school performance
Normal Distribution- want a bell curve, most people near middle/average
Correcting for the Flynn Effect- as society’s average changes, you have to adjust how results are calculated
Reliability
Its ability to produce consistent results time after time, from person to person
Good test- 150-200 questions
Test-Retest- if you have the same person take it twice, do they get about the same results?
Split-half- the first half of the test should have the same score has the second half
Validity- does the test test what it's supposed to measure?
Content- is your test testing the correct subject
Predictive- do aptitude tests really predict what they are supposed to?
Bias
Cultural Variation- some cultures do better on certain kinds of questions and worse on others
Stereotype Threat- the assumption that everybody has the same common knowledge
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)
*timed
Verbal section- like an english test
Performance section- math, problem solving
Composite- those two scores put together
SAT- Scholastic Aptitude Test
The test for predicting college performance
Math, Verbal, Written English, Equating sections
Why it's still used- It is the best predictor of future college performance, better than essays, GPA, everything
State/Grade-Level Exams
All achievement tests
Ex. EOC, EOG, NCFE
CAT- California Achievement Test-> Nationwide achievement test for elementary school students
Woodcock-Johnson (General Intellectual Ability)
Comprehensive Knowledge- how much you know
Fluid Reasoning- can you learn something and and then use it to problem solve
Processing Speed- timed element
Psychological Assessments Goal
to identify:
Personality traits
Potential mental health disorders
Inventories
Purpose
Personality
Only provide a General Screening for disorders- not diagnostic tool
Types of Questions
Respond to statements on a degree- totally disagree to totally agree
Size
hundreds of questions, takes hours
Long so person doesn’t lie
Types
Self-reporting- you fill it out yourself
MMPI- Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
10 categories of questions to look at 10 potential problems
Scales
Hypochondriasis- someone who thinks they're sick when they're not
Depression
Hysteria- can’t control emotions
Psychopathic Deviance
Masculine/Femininity
Paranoia
Psychasthenia- people with anxiety and obsessions
Schizophrenia- disorders where you have lost touch w/ reality
Mania- people who are always up
Social Introversion- how shy/extroverted are you
California Psychological Inventory (CPI)
Similarities to MMPI
Same format, similar length
4 Categories- grouped characteristics
Poise, Self-Assurance, Ego
Socialization, Responsibility Intrapersonal Values, Character
Achievement Potential and Intellectual Efficiency
Intellectual and Interest Modes
Created 4 quadrant role identities
Implementer, supporter, innovator, visualizer
Problems with Inventories
Validity- do they actually do a good job screening for disorders?
Meaning- what do the results actually mean?
Ability to Cope- it cannot measure your ability to cope
You might have high levels of stress, depression, etc but you can handle it fine
Barnum Effect- “We have something for everyone” the belief that you can find something wrong with anybody if you look hard enough
Vocational Interest Tests
Purpose- a test designed to identify a career you might be interested in and might be good at
Validity- does this really give you a good idea of what kind of job you'd be interested in/be good at?
Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory
Has 6 quadrants with different types of careers (social, artistic, etc)
Question Types- either/or questions
Comparison- results are compared to different people and careers
Problems- people read too much into the results
Alternatives to Vocational Interest Tests
Interviews- talk to candidates to see if they would be a good fit
Halo Effect- people are on their best behavior and give the interviewer the answers they want, not necessarily the honest answer
Reverse Halo Effect- no matter what the interviewed person says, it's the wrong thing
Standout- the person who stands out gets remember over the best candidate
Situational Assessments- bring in a candidate and have them do the job on a trial basis