Common Law Non-Fatal Offences

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/22

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 1:00 PM on 7/10/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

23 Terms

1
New cards

What are the two common law non-fatal offences?

Assault and Battery

2
New cards

What is the AR of assault?

Any act that causes V to apprehend the immediate infliction of unlawful force or violence.

3
New cards

How is the AR of assault committed?

If V is put in fear. It only matters what the effect on V is.

4
New cards

Logdon (1976)

Facts - D, as a joke, pointed a gun at V and said he was going to use it against V. She was terrified until D said it was a replica.

Principle - This can constitute an assault

5
New cards

Smith v CS for Woking (1983)

Facts - V was at home in her ground floor flat in a nightdress. D was in the garden staring through her window.

Principle - He had caused fear. Immediate means that V didn’t know what D was going to do next.

6
New cards

Ireland (1997)

Facts - D made a series of silent phone calls to V which then caused her mental injury.

Principle - Silence can constitute the fear of IUV.

7
New cards

Constanza (1997)

Facts - D wrote threatening words on V’s garage which he knew he would see.

Principle - An assault can be an omission

8
New cards

DDP v Santana-Bermudez (2004)

Facts - V was searching D when she was pricked by D’s hyper-dermic syringe.

Principle - He was under a legal duty to warn her but failed to do so. Assault by omission.

9
New cards

Tuberville v Savage (1669)

Facts - D equipped his sword and said “if the courts weren’t in town Id run this through your body”

Principle - D was not guilty because his words contradicted his actions

10
New cards

What is the MR of Assault?

The intention or recklessness as to putting V in fear of IUV.

11
New cards

Savage (1994)

Facts - D saw V’s new girlfriend at a pub. She went up to her intending to throw beer on her. She did but the glass also cut V’s wrist.

Principle - D must have at least been aware of the risk she was taking, that the glass would injure V.

12
New cards

What section of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 is Battery?

Section 39

13
New cards

What is the AR of a battery?

The unlawful application/infliction of a force to another.

14
New cards

What needs to be proved for a battery?

No harm needs to be proved, only that there was force which can be slight

15
New cards

Thomas (1985)

Facts - D touched the hem of a 12 year old girls skirt. He was charged with indecent assault.

Principle - Touching a person’s clothes while being worn is like touching the person.

16
New cards

K v the DPP (1989)

Facts - D put acid in a hot air dryer for hands. It was in the position for drying faces and it hit V in the face causing serious injuries.

Principle - This was an indirect battery - a battery does not have to involve direct contact.

17
New cards

Martin (1881)

Facts - D shouted ‘fire’ causing the theatre audience to run to the doors and be crushed.

Principle - Indirect battery - there was no contact

18
New cards

Haystead (2000)

Facts - D punched X whilst she was holding a baby, V, which caused X to drop V.

Principle - This was a direct battery on X and an indirect battery on V (transferred malice)

19
New cards

What case can be used for a battery if V harms himself while escaping?

Roberts (1971)

20
New cards

What case can be used for a battery caused by a continuous act?

Fagan (1969)

21
New cards

When can a battery be lawful?

If D is acting in self-defence.

22
New cards

What case contains the MR of battery?

Venna (1976)

23
New cards

Venna (1976)

Facts - D was arrested for a public order offence. He had struggled violently with the PC who was trying to arrest him.

Principle - The MR of battery is intentionally or recklessly applying force to another.