Tort 1: Duty of Care

5.0(1)
studied byStudied by 12 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/43

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

44 Terms

1
New cards
Process of Tort
Loss, Duty, Breach, Causation, Remoteness, Defences
2
New cards
Duty of Care process
Precedent, Foreseeability, Proximity, Policy considerations
3
New cards
Personal Injury
physical/ bodily injury
4
New cards
Psychiatric harm
A recognised mental illness eg reactive depression
5
New cards
Property damage
Eg damage to car or roof of house
6
New cards
Consequential economic loss
loss of wages as claimant could not work
7
New cards
Pure economic loss
lost savings due to an investment based on bad advice
8
New cards
Donoghue v Stevenson
"love they neighbour becomes law", first negligence case
9
New cards
Neighbour Principle
Formed by Lord Atkin in Donoghue v Stevenson
10
New cards
Caparo v Dickman
established the three part test (forseeability, proximity, fair, just and reasonable)
11
New cards
Established authority
Precedent for a case
12
New cards
When do courts need to impose their own duty of care?
When the case is novel
13
New cards
Policy considerations
Floodgates, Insurance, Crushing liability, deterrence, maintenance of high standards, defensive practices
14
New cards
Nettleship v Weston
drivers owe duty of care to other road users
15
New cards
Cassidy v Ministry of Health
healthcare professionals owe a duty of care to patients once accepting them
16
New cards
Baker v T. E. Hopkins
A rescuer is owed a duty of care by the company whose employees they are rescuing
17
New cards
Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
Police owe a duty of care to protect the public when carrying out an arrest
18
New cards
Watson v British Boxing Board of Control
Sportsmen owed a duty of care by respective sporting bodies
19
New cards
Exceptions for Omissions
Statutory duty, contractual duty, sufficient control, assumed responsibility, defendant creates the risk
20
New cards
Smith v Littlewoods
No duty for pure omissions
21
New cards
Occupiers' Liability Act 1957
Imposes an obligation on occupiers with regard to lawful visitors
22
New cards
Stansbie v Troman
No omission for contractual duty
23
New cards
Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
No omission for sufficient control
24
New cards
Barrett v Ministry of Defence
No omission for assumed responsibility
25
New cards
Goldman v Hargrave
No omission for creating risk
26
New cards
Kent v Griffiths
Ambulance service owes duty of care to response in a reasonable time
27
New cards
Capital and Counties v Hampshire CC
Fire brigade owes duty of care not to make the situation worse
28
New cards
Alexandrou v Oxford
Police do not have a duty to attend emergency calls
29
New cards
General rule for liability for third parties
Defendant is generally not liable for acts of third parties
30
New cards
Exceptions for no liability for third parties
Sufficient Proximity between defendant and claimant, sufficient proximity between defendant and third party, defendant created the danger, risk was on defendant's premises
31
New cards
Swinney v Chief Constable of Northumbria
case for sufficient proximity between claimant and defendant (third parties)
32
New cards
Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co
Case for sufficient proximity between Third party and defendant
33
New cards
Stansbie v Troman (Third party case)
Defendant liable for creating the danger (third party)
34
New cards
Smith v Littlewoods (Third party)
Defendant may be liable for third parties on their premises
35
New cards
Palmer v Tees Health Authority
Defendant not liable for third party's actions after discharging them
36
New cards
Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire
Police not liable for third party where there is lack of proximity
37
New cards
CN and GN v Poole Borough Council
Public body not liable for third party's actions where they do not have assumed responsibility over the victim
38
New cards
Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire
Public bodies not liable for negligence regarding policy matters, only operational matters
39
New cards
Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (policy considerations)
Police not liable where imposing a duty of care could lead to defensive practices or floodgates opening
40
New cards
Phelps v Hillingdon London Borough
Public bodies owe a duty of care if they assume responsibility of someone
41
New cards
Jebson v Ministry of Defence
Military owes duty of care to soldiers when they assume responsibility for them at home
42
New cards
Mulcahy v Ministry of Defence
Army do not owe duty of care to soldiers when in active combat
43
New cards
Process for establishing duty of care
Precedent first, if no precedent then apply three stage test
44
New cards
OLL Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport
Coast guard do not owe a duty of care to attend, just to not make the situation worse