AP Gov Unit 2: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

studied byStudied by 3 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 44

45 Terms

1

Civil liberties

Individual Protections against government actions.

  • Ex: Free exercise clause - religious practices

New cards
2

Civil Rights

Equal application of Rights regardless of race, ethnicity, gender or religion

  • Ex: Every defendant gets a lawyer

New cards
3

Equal Due Process

right to fair procedures and processes

New cards
4

Equal Protection Clauses

No discrimination - race, religion, etc

New cards
5

Selective Incorporation / Incorporation Doctrine

On a case-by-case basis the SCOTUS has nationalized the Bill of Rights. Once an amendment has been incorporated/nationalized, a citizen is protected from both the federal and the state governments

  • Basically, the states have to follow the Bill of Rights.

New cards
6

4th Amendment 

Protection against warrantless search and seizure

  • Probable cause: reasonable basis someone is guilty 

  • Courts must approve the search & seizure

    • Search Warrant

New cards
7

Exclusionary Rule

Evidence obtained in an illegal search is inadmissible (suppressed, not allowed in use of conviction).

New cards
8

5th Amendment

Self-Incrimination

  • Miranda v. Arizona

SCOTUS: must make suspect aware of 5th.

Except a Coerced confession doesn’t preclude a conviction if enough other evidence, Suspect must invoke it clearly, Police can go back for seconds, no entrapment.

New cards
9

Eminent Domain

Government has to justify taking of private property for public use AND pay fair market value.

New cards
10

Equal due process rights

Every person gets their rights - can’t be for some and not others.

New cards
11

6th Amendment

It gives citizens a series of rights in criminal trials.

  • Trial, Jury

  • Know the charges

  • Speedy, jury peers & public

New cards
12

8th Amendment

No Cruel or Unusual Punishment

  • Punishment must fit the crime

New cards
13

5th Amendment

Ensures the protection against self-incrimination

Equal due process under the law

  • Discrimination can be considered a violation of equal due process because it unjustly treats groups differently, less than

  • Due process - everyone gets the same rights

New cards
14

14th Amendment

No state may deny equal treatment

New cards
15

Strict Scrutiny

Applied when race, ethnicity is at issue, always unconstitutional. No compelling reason, usually race or ethnicity.

New cards
16

Intermediate Scrutiny

Likely to be found unconstitutional; related to gender.

New cards
17

Affirmative Action

Policies designed to give special attention or compensatory treatment of members of some previously disadvantaged groups.

New cards
18

De facto discrimination

Social, economic, cultural biases — discrimination (ex post facto - just happens, not overtly trying, not thinking).

New cards
19

De jure discrimination

Specific law—discrimination

New cards
20
Marbury v. Madison (1803)

SCOTUS declared it was the Court’s job to interpret the Constitution. Established the doctrine of judicial review.

  • 14th Amendment

New cards
21
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

SCOTUS ruled that Congress has the power to create a national bank and that states cannot tax the federal government. Established implied powers; use of elastic clause; state unable to tax fed. Constitution & federal laws are supreme.

  • 10th amendment

New cards
22
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
Established separate but equal.
New cards
23

Schenck V. U.S. (1919)

Printed and distributed anti-war fliers during WWI. SCOTUS ruled for the clear and present danger test Restricted speech during wartime.

  • 1st Amendment

New cards
24

Baker v. Carr (1961)

In Tennessee, more people moved to Shelby County. Though the state was supposed to redistrict (redraw district borders for elected officials based on population changes from the decennial census) after the census, they didn't. The state was counting less than the people's votes in a rural county.

SCOTUS ruled that federal courts could hear redistricting cases based on the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. Established that all votes should be equal, regardless of where a person lives

  • 14th Amendment - Equal Protection Clause

  • "one-person, one-vote" principle

New cards
25
Gitlow v. New York (1925)

Established the precedent of federalizing the Bill of Rights (applying them to the states); states cannot deny freedom of speech - protected through the due process clause of Amendment 14.

New cards
26
Gideon v. Wainright (1963)

Man arrested in FL for petty theft; FL denied his request for a public defender. SCOTUS declared that the states must provide counsel/an attorney to indigent defendants as it is fundamental to a fair trial under the 6th Amendment.

  • 6th Amendment: Trial Rights

  • 14th Amendment

New cards
27

Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)

Tinkers wore peace armbands to school, which got them suspended. SCOTUS ruled that Political speech is a protected form of speech & that Schools may not restrict it unless it materially and substantially disrupts the educational process.

  • 1st Amendment (Speech) - Symbolic Speech

New cards
28

New York Times v. U.S. (1971)

NYT planned to publish the Pentagon papers. Government attempted to stop this under the clear & present danger test. SCOTUS ruled in favor of NYT because the gov did not demonstrate a security risk.

  • 1st Amendment: Speech

  • Prior restraint: Gov. may preempt publication if the information poses a national security risk.

New cards
29
Brown v. Board, 1st (1954)

School segregation is unconstitutional. Overturned separate but equal, use of the 14th Amendment.

New cards
30
Brown v. Board, 2nd (1955)
Ordered schools to desegregate "with all due and deliberate speed."
New cards
31
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

Established exclusionary rule; illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in court.

  • 4th Amendment - protects against unreasonable searches and seizures

New cards
32
Engel v. Vitale (1962)

The New York Board of Regents allows daily, voluntary prayer. However, SCOTUS ruled that this violated the First Amendment Establishment Clause → The courts also prohibited the recitation of prayer in public schools.

  • 1st Amendment - Establishment Clause: prevents the government from establishing a national religion or favoring one religion over another

New cards
33
Griswald v. Connecticut (1965)
Established the right to privacy through the 4th and 9th Amendments. Set a precedent for Roe v. Wade.
New cards
34
Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
Established Miranda warnings of counsel and silence. Must be given before questioning. Warren Court's judicial activism in criminal rights.
New cards
35
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)

Allowed states to provide textbooks and busing to students attending private religious schools. Established a 3-part test to determine if the establishment clause is violated: nonsecular purpose, advances/inhibits religion, excessive entanglement with the government. Known as the Lemon Test.

New cards
36

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)

Amish practitioners stop sending their children to their Amish schools after age 14; instead, they become trade apprentices. WI enforced and applied its mandatory school attendance law to Amish children. SCOTUS rules Free Exercise clause has supremacy (more important) than WI’s interest in all children attending school

  • 1st Amendment (Religon)

New cards
37
Roe v. Wade (1973)

SCOTUS ruled that women have the right to choose to have an abortion under the right to privacy.

  • 14th Amendment

  • Dobbs v. Jackson, 2022 Overturned it, 1973: “Abortion” is not a right explicit in the Constitution.

New cards
38
U.C. Regents v. Bakke (1978)

Alan Bakke sued UC Davis Medical School, claiming they denied him equal protection. SCOTUS ordered Bakke to be admitted and said the quota-based admissions policy was discriminatory Strict quotas are unconstitutional but states may allow race to be taken into account as a PLUS factor in admissions decisions.

  • 14th Amendment: Equal Protection

  • Quotas violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964

New cards
39
Texas v. Johnson (1989)

Struck down TX state law that banned flag burning, which is a protected form of symbolic speech.

  • 1st Amendment (Speech) - Symbolic Speech

New cards
40

Shaw v. Reno (1993)

Shaw & other North Carolina residents filed an action against the state, declaring that the state had created unconstitutional racial gerrymandering (The political manipulation of electoral district boundaries to advantage a party, group, or socioeconomic class within the constituency).

SCOTUS ruled that any legislative redistricting must be strictly scrutinized and that any laws related to racially motivated redistricting must be held to narrow standards and compelling government interests.

  • 14th Amendment

New cards
41
U.S. v. Lopez (1995)

Lopez was arrested for carrying a concealed weapon into his high school. Charged under the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990.

SCOTUS ruled that the Gun-Free School Zones Act exceeded Congress's authority to regulate interstate commerce because gun possession in schools was not an economic activity that affected interstate commerce.

  • Limited the federal government's authority under the Commerce Clause

New cards
42
Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)
Struck down the use of "bonus points" for race in undergrad admissions at the University of Michigan.
New cards
43
Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)
Allowed the use of race as a general factor in law school admissions at the University of Michigan.
New cards
44
McDonald v. Chicago (2010)

Chicago banned handguns in city limits. SCOTUS ruled that Chicago’s handgun law was too broad and restrictive.

  • 2nd Amendment

New cards
45

Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (2010)

SCOTUS ruled that corporations could continue to run political advertisements and corporate funding of independent political broadcasts in elections cannot be limited because it would limit freedom of speech.

  • 1st Amendment (Speech): The Free Speech Clause

New cards
robot